- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06506669
Cataract Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) Feasibility Pilot Study (CaTNAPS-1)
Comparing Two Normal Approaches to Procedural Sedation for Cataract Surgery: A Prospective, Feasibility Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
- University of California, San Francisco
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 60 years old
- Capable of providing informed consent and completing the study procedures in English
- Able to provide consent for oneself
- Able to follow directions
- Able to climb one flight of stairs without stopping to rest
- Have a new diagnosis of cataract disease
- Plan on having cataract surgery on their eye within the next 6 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of prior cataract surgery
- Admission to the hospital within the past 30 days
- Difficulty being sedated during other minor outpatient procedures or imaging studies
- Allergy or resistance to local anesthetic agents
- Cannot lay flat on your back without having symptoms (i.e., difficulty breathing, severe back pain, etc.)
- History of severe anxiety requiring routine use of benzodiazepines
- Severe valve disease (e.g., critical aortic stenosis)
- Cardiac conditions requiring an implanted cardiac device such as a pacemaker, defibrillator, or left ventricular assist device (for arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, etc.)
- Untreated chest pain or angina
- Patients with movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson's Disease)
- History of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), or seizures
- Require home oxygen (O2) at rest or with exertion
- End-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis
- Morbid obesity (BMI>35)
- Patient undergoing cataract surgery in combination with any other ophthalmologic procedure
- Patient requiring general anesthesia during cataract surgery due to the underlying characteristics of the existing cataract and/or anticipated complexity of the planned procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Oral sedation will be administered to patients prior to the procedure.
|
Oral medication for anxiolysis administered in the preoperative setting
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
An oral placebo pill will be administered to patients prior to the procedure.
|
A placebo pill with no active ingredients administered in the preoperative setting
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With High Satisfaction (ISAS Score ≥ 2)
Time Frame: 30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
|
The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) is an 11-item validated questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction with anesthesia care. Each item is scored from -3 to +3, and the total score is calculated as the mean of all items, resulting in a total score range of -3 to +3. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. For this analysis, high satisfaction is defined as an ISAS score ≥ 2. |
30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Meeting Eligibility Criteria at Screening
Time Frame: At screening (prior to enrollment)
|
Number of participants who met all eligibility criteria at the time of screening, out of the total number of participants assessed for eligibility
|
At screening (prior to enrollment)
|
|
Number of Participants Completing All Study Surveys at Each Timepoint
Time Frame: 30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
|
Number of participants who completed all required study surveys at each postoperative timepoint (PACU, POD1, POD7), out of the number of participants assigned to each study arm
|
30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
|
|
Number of Participants Who Completed All Required Study Procedures
Time Frame: From enrollment through final study follow-up (POD7)
|
Number of participants who completed all required study procedures from enrollment through the final postoperative follow-up visit, out of the total number of participants enrolled in the study Instruments: Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Functional Recovery Index (FRI) |
From enrollment through final study follow-up (POD7)
|
|
Number of Participants With Sedation-Related Complications During 30-Day Postoperative Follow-up
Time Frame: From enrollment through 30 days after surgery
|
Number of participants experiencing at least one sedation-related complication within 30 days after surgery, out of the total number of participants enrolled in the study
|
From enrollment through 30 days after surgery
|
|
Number of Participants Achieving Recovery on the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS)
Time Frame: 30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
|
The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) assesses recovery across physiological, pain, emotional, cognitive, and activities of daily living domains. For this analysis, recovery is defined as meeting PQRS recovery criteria at each time point. Recovery is defined as a return to baseline performance in all assessed PQRS domains at each time point. |
30 minutes (PACU), 1 day (POD1), and 7 days after surgery (POD7)
|
|
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Total Score After Surgery
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 days after surgery
|
The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a validated 15-item questionnaire assessing postoperative recovery across physical comfort, emotional state, psychological support, and physical independence.
Each item is scored from 0 to 10, and the total score is calculated by summing all items, resulting in a total score range of 0 to 150.
Higher scores indicate better recovery.
|
1 day and 7 days after surgery
|
|
Functional Recovery Index (FRI) Total Score After Surgery
Time Frame: 1 day and 7 days after surgery
|
The Functional Recovery Index (FRI) is a validated 14-item questionnaire assessing postoperative functional recovery, including mobility and activities of daily living.
Each item is scored and summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 100.
Lower scores indicate better functional recovery.
|
1 day and 7 days after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Catherine L Chen, M.D., University of California, San Francisco
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
- Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
- Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
- Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
- Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
- Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):4-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
- Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, Davila-Roman VG, Gerhard-Herman MD, Holly TA, Kane GC, Marine JE, Nelson MT, Spencer CC, Thompson A, Ting HH, Uretsky BF, Wijeysundera DN. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Vascular Medicine Endorsed by the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Feb;22(1):162-215. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-0025-z. No abstract available.
- Partridge JS, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing. 2012 Mar;41(2):142-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr182.
- Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO. Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review. Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
- Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
- Ianchulev T, Litoff D, Ellinger D, Stiverson K, Packer M. Office-Based Cataract Surgery: Population Health Outcomes Study of More than 21 000 Cases in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2016 Apr;123(4):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
- Glisson C, Landsverk J, Schoenwald S, Kelleher K, Hoagwood KE, Mayberg S, Green P; Research Network on Youth Mental Health. Assessing the organizational social context (OSC) of mental health services: implications for research and practice. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008 Mar;35(1-2):98-113. doi: 10.1007/s10488-007-0148-5. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
- Chen CL, Lin GA, Bardach NS, Clay TH, Boscardin WJ, Gelb AW, Maze M, Gropper MA, Dudley RA. Preoperative medical testing in Medicare patients undergoing cataract surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 16;372(16):1530-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410846.
- McIsaac DI, MacDonald DB, Aucoin SD. Frailty for Perioperative Clinicians: A Narrative Review. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1450-1460. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004602.
- Chen CL, Clay TH, McLeod S, Chang HP, Gelb AW, Dudley RA. A Revised Estimate of Costs Associated With Routine Preoperative Testing in Medicare Cataract Patients With a Procedure-Specific Indicator. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 1;136(3):231-238. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6372.
- Liu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS. Cataracts. Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):600-612. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30544-5. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
- Norregaard, J. C. Results from the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 85, 5-32, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00937.x (2007).
- Kent, C. Cataract Surgery: Is an anesthesiologist necessary?, <https://www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/cataract-surgery-is-an-anesthesiologist-necessary> (2009).
- Andrews, M. Anthem Calls On Eye Surgeons To Monitor Anesthesia During Cataract Surgery, <https://khn.org/news/anthem-calls-on-eye-surgeons-to-monitor-anesthesia-during-cataract-surgery/> (2018).
- Zakrzewski PA, Friel T, Fox G, Braga-Mele R. Monitored anesthesia care provided by registered respiratory care practitioners during cataract surgery: a report of 1957 cases. Ophthalmology. 2005 Feb;112(2):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.08.016.
- Kent-Smith BT, Wallace GM. Routine cataract surgery without the presence of an anaesthetist. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;35(6):589. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01553.x. No abstract available.
- Murray P, Adams K, Haddad P, Murray N, O'Rourke M. The routine requirement for anaesthetists in local anaesthetic cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;35(2):195-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01441.x. No abstract available.
- Zakrzewski PA, Banashkevich AV, Friel T, Braga-Mele R. Monitored anesthesia care by registered respiratory therapists during cataract surgery: an update. Ophthalmology. 2010 May;117(5):897-902. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.005. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
- Basta B, Gioia L, Gemma M, Dedola E, Bianchi I, Fasce F, Beretta L. Systemic adverse events during 2005 phacoemulsifications under monitored anesthesia care: a prospective evaluation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011 Sep;77(9):877-83.
- Koolwijk J, Fick M, Selles C, Turgut G, Noordergraaf JI, Tukkers FS, Noordergraaf GJ. Outpatient cataract surgery: incident and procedural risk analysis do not support current clinical ophthalmology guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):281-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
- Katz J, Feldman MA, Bass EB, Lubomski LH, Tielsch JM, Petty BG, Fleisher LA, Schein OD. Injectable versus topical anesthesia for cataract surgery: patient perceptions of pain and side effects. The Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery study team. Ophthalmology. 2000 Nov;107(11):2054-60. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00359-6.
- Katz J, Feldman MA, Bass EB, Lubomski LH, Tielsch JM, Petty BG, Fleisher LA, Schein OD; Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery Study Team. Adverse intraoperative medical events and their association with anesthesia management strategies in cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001 Oct;108(10):1721-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00704-7.
- Fukuoka H, Afshari NA. The impact of age-related cataract on measures of frailty in an aging global population. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;28(1):93-97. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000338.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Calls on Anthem to Rescind Its New Policy on Anesthesia for Cataract Surgery, <https://www.asahq.org/advocacy-and-asapac/fda-and-washington-alerts/washington-alerts/2018/02/asa-calls-on-anthem-to-rescind-its-new-policy-on-anesthesia-for-cataract-surgery?&ct=fd2b35b6cdb74e0b126f4539b73b56360091233e85002bc197d8049fa56b7a4253b022b37557ad25186cfc15475fa96cd09811e97c66fe62b04a1ec1298f82ef> (2018).
- American Academy of Ophthalmology. Pressure on Anthem Grows; Academy Keeps Pushing for Cataract-Surgery Anesthesia Coverage, 2018).
- Hubbard RE, Story DA. Patient frailty: the elephant in the operating room. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan;69 Suppl 1:26-34. doi: 10.1111/anae.12490.
- Kim DH, Patorno E, Pawar A, Lee H, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ. Measuring Frailty in Administrative Claims Data: Comparative Performance of Four Claims-Based Frailty Measures in the U.S. Medicare Data. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 May 22;75(6):1120-1125. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz224.
- Kim DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Lipsitz LA, Rockwood K, Avorn J. Measuring Frailty in Medicare Data: Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(7):980-987. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx229.
- Hodge W, Horsley T, Albiani D, Baryla J, Belliveau M, Buhrmann R, O'Connor M, Blair J, Lowcock E. The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2007 Apr 24;176(9):1285-90. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060962.
- Iroku-Malize T, Kirsch S. Eye Conditions in Older Adults: Cataracts. FP Essent. 2016 Jun;445:17-23.
- Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Sloane M, Wells J, Stalvey BT, Gauthreaux S. Impact of cataract surgery on motor vehicle crash involvement by older adults. JAMA. 2002 Aug 21;288(7):841-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.7.841.
- Hillman, L. Phaco turns 50, <https://www.eyeworld.org/phaco-turns-50> (2017).
- Eke T, Thompson JR. Serious complications of local anaesthesia for cataract surgery: a 1 year national survey in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;91(4):470-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.106005. Epub 2006 Nov 23.
- Jefferis JM, Clarke MP, Taylor JP, Brittain KR. Challenges for the cataract surgeon treating people with dementia: a qualitative study exploring anesthetic choices. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep 26;8:1993-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S69388. eCollection 2014.
- Norregaard JC, Bernth-Petersen P, Bellan L, Alonso J, Black C, Dunn E, Andersen TF, Espallargues M, Anderson GF. Intraoperative clinical practice and risk of early complications after cataract extraction in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain. Ophthalmology. 1999 Jan;106(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90004-0.
- Sharwood PL, Thomas D, Roberts TV. Adverse medical events associated with cataract surgery performed under topical anaesthesia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;36(9):842-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.01924.x.
- Stein JD, Grossman DS, Mundy KM, Sugar A, Sloan FA. Severe adverse events after cataract surgery among medicare beneficiaries. Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1716-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
- Rocha G, Turner C. Safety of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with oral sedation without anesthetic monitoring. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;42(2):288-94.
- California Medical Association. CMA calls for investigation into Anthem restricting use of sedation during cataract surgery, <https://www.cmadocs.org/newsroom/news/view/ArticleID/21466/t/CMA-calls-for-investigation-into-Anthem-policy-restricting-use-of-sedation-during-cataract-surgery> (2018).
- Whitlock EL, Whittington RA. The Frailty Syndrome: Anesthesiologists Must Understand More and Fear Less. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun;130(6):1445-1448. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004789. No abstract available.
- Hays, D. G. & Singh, A. A. Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. (Guilford Press, 2012).
- Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell L, Entwistle V, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45. doi: 10.1080/08870440903194015.
- Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M. & Namey, E., E. Applied Thematic Analysis. (Sage Publications, 2011).
- MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K. & Milstein, B. Codebook Development for Team-Based Qualitative Analysis. CAM Journal 10, 31-36, doi:10.1177/1525822x980100020301 (2016).
- Hays, D. G. & Singh, A. A. in Qualitative Inquiry in Clinical and Educational Settings Ch. 10, 292-336 (Guilford Press, 2011).
- Rosenfeld, S. Monitored Anesthesia Care in Cataract Surgery, <https://www.aao.org/eyenet/article/monitored-anesthesia-care-in-cataract-surgery> (2018).
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23-40367
- 5K23AG072035-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.