Electroencephalographic Characteristics of Chronic Pain in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

August 12, 2024 updated by: Ruquan Han, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Electroencephalographic Characteristics of Chronic Pain in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: an Exploratory, Interventional, Non-randomized Controlled Study

The diagnosis of chronic pain currently lacks objective and quantifiable biomarkers. This study aims to observe the EEG characteristics of patients with chronic pain following spinal cord injury and subsequently administer analgesic interventions with remifentanil, esketamine, flurbiprofen, and spinal cord stimulation. The correlation between EEG features and pain intensity will be examined. The research aims to advance the objectification of chronic pain diagnosis and treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100070
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Spinal Cord Injury Patients With Chronic Pain

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 - 65 years old;
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III;
  • Dextromanual;
  • Chronic Pain following Spinal Cord Injury;
  • Spinal cord electrical stimulator implantation under general anesthesia;
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with mental and behavioral disorders.
  • Previous history of craniocerebral disease;
  • History of drug and alcohol abuse;
  • Patients with aphasia or inability to cooperate with the pain assessments;
  • Previous adverse reaction to esketamine, opioids or NSAIDs;
  • Known sever insufficiency of vitals(such as heart failure/renal dysfunction/hepatic failure);
  • Patients with myasthenia gravis, bronchial asthma, or a predisposition to respiratory depression;
  • Bleeding tendency;
  • BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²;
  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Spinal Cord Injury Patients Without Pain

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 - 65 years old;
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III;
  • Dextromanual;
  • Spinal Cord Injury Patients Without Pain;
  • Spinal cord electrical stimulator implantation under general anesthesia;
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with mental and behavioral disorders.
  • Previous history of craniocerebral disease;
  • History of drug and alcohol abuse;
  • Patients with aphasia or inability to cooperate with the pain assessments;
  • Previous adverse reaction to esketamine, opioids or NSAIDs;
  • Known sever insufficiency of vitals(such as heart failure/renal dysfunction/hepatic failure);
  • Patients with myasthenia gravis, bronchial asthma, or a predisposition to respiratory depression;
  • Bleeding tendency;
  • BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²;
  • Pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Patients without pain
Collect resting-state EEG data and NRS scores.
Experimental: Patients with chronic pain treated with esketamine
Continuous intravenous infusion of esketamine at a dose of 0.2 mg/(kg · h). Collect resting-state EEG data and NRS scores 40 minutes after administration.
Collect resting-state EEG data and NRS scores with the spinal cord stimulator both turned off and on.
Experimental: Patients with chronic pain treated with remifentanil
Collect resting-state EEG data and NRS scores with the spinal cord stimulator both turned off and on.
The plasma drug concentrations of remifentanil were set at 0.5 ng/ml, 1 ng/ml, and 1.5 ng/ml. After each plasma drug concentration reached a steady state, the NRS scores were assessed, and resting-state EEG was recorded for at least 5 minutes.
Experimental: Patients with chronic pain treated with flurbiprofen
Collect resting-state EEG data and NRS scores with the spinal cord stimulator both turned off and on.
Single intravenous injection of Flurbiprofen at a dose of 100 mg. Collect resting-state EEG data and NRS scores 10 minutes after administration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EEG Spectral Characteristics
Time Frame: During the trial(up to 3 hours for each subject).

EEG power spectrum characteristics of chronic pain in patients with spinal cord injury under esketamine, remifentanil, flurbiprofen administration and spinal cord stimulation, including the δ, θ, α, β, and γ frequency bands.

administration, including the δ, θ, α, β, and γ frequency bands.

During the trial(up to 3 hours for each subject).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale(NRS)
Time Frame: During the trial(through study completion, 7 days)
Numerical Rating Scale Assessment Pre- and Post-Analgesic Treatment. The NRS ranges from 0 to 10, with 0-3 indicating mild pain, 4-6 indicating moderate pain, and 7-10 indicating severe pain.
During the trial(through study completion, 7 days)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder(GAD-7)
Time Frame: During the trial(through study completion, 7 days)
The GAD-7 scale ranges from 0 to 21 points, with a higher score indicating a higher level of anxiety.
During the trial(through study completion, 7 days)
Patient Health Questionnaire-9(PHQ-9)
Time Frame: During the trial(through study completion, 7 days)
The PHQ-9 scale ranges from 0 to 27 points, with a higher score indicating a higher level of depression.
During the trial(through study completion, 7 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ruquan Han, M.D., Ph D, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe