- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06536478
The Effect of Exercise Intervention on Posture, Trunk Flexibility and Spine Function in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
The primary goal of this clinical trail is to compare the effect of a five-week specific motor interventions on the postural alignment, trunk range of motion and spine function in patients with Parkinson's disease. The secondary goal is to investigate the effect of specific motor interventions on pain, balance, gait, and quality of life.
Participants will:
be randomly allocated to a control group or an exercise group and will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks. Each group will be assessed for posture, trunk range of motion, spine function, pain, balance, gait, and quality of life before and after the intervention.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants will be randomly allocated to a control group or an exercise group and will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks. Each group will be assessed for posture, trunk range of motion, spine function, pain, balance, gait and quality of life before and after the intervention.
Posture evaluation was performed by measuring the angles of Flexion and Side-bending, by placing marks on the Spinal process of 7th cervical spine and the Spinal process of 5th lumbar spine, and by taking images of the Sagittal plane and Frontal plane. A digital flat-panel camera was used to take images in the sagittal plane and the coronal plane, and the angle between the line connecting the seventh cervical process of the spine and the fifth lumbar process of the lumbar spine and the vertical line was measured on the images; the angle in the coronal plane was defined as the anterior tilt angle, and that in the coronal plane was defined as the lateral bending angle.
Trunk flexion range of motion is measured using a goniometer and a tape measure in the following manner: Trunk flexion range of motion is measured with the trunk flexed anteriorly: the starting position of the case is standing in an upright position, and the tape measure is fixed to the seventh cervical vertebrae and the first vertebrae on the spinous processes, then the case is asked to relax the trunk forward to the end of the flexion without anteriorly tilting the pelvis. The difference between the tape measure in forward bending and upright position was taken as the value of trunk anterior tilt mobility. Trunk extension range of motion: The starting position of the case was standing in an upright position, and a tape measure was fixed on the spinous processes of the seventh cervical vertebrae and the first vertebrae of the recommended vertebrae. After the case was asked to relax the trunk with both hands and bend the trunk back to the bottom without tilting the pelvis posteriorly, and the difference between the posterior bending and the tape measure in the upright position was used as a value of the trunk extension range of motion. Trunk side-bending range of motion: The starting position of the case was standing upright, the center of the joint goniometer was aligned with the spinal process of the first segment of the recommended vertebrae of the case, one side of the goniometer was perpendicular to the floor, and the other side was aligned with the seventh segment of the cervical vertebrae of the case, the case was asked to make a left/right side-bending motion, and the angle between the left/right side-bending and the upright position was subtracted as the value of trunk side-bending range of motion. The angle between the left/right lateral bend and the upright position was subtracted to obtain the value of trunk lateral bending activity. Trunk rotation range of motion: With the case in a seated but not reclined position, the center of the joint goniometer was aligned with the center of the case's head, with one side of the goniometer parallel to the line of the iliac crest of the pelvis, and the other side parallel to the line of the shoulder crests on both sides. One side of the goniometer was parallel to the line of the iliac crest of the pelvis and the other side was parallel to the line of the shoulder crests on both sides of the body. The case was asked to perform a left/right rotation, and the angle between the left/right rotation and the seated position was subtracted to obtain a value for the degree of torso rotation.
Spinal function is assessed by evaluating the functional activities related to the spine, including Functional axial rotation and Supine to and from standing. The Functional Axial Rotation Test is performed by asking the patient to use a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device in a sitting position to measure the angle of rotation of the case when viewed from the left/right side. The lying to standing test is performed by asking the patient to use a Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device to measure the angle of rotation of the case when viewed from the right/left side. The Lying to Standing Test measures the time taken by the case to move from standing to lying and lying to standing.
Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale , VAS, which asks the patient about the degree of low back pain.
The Shortened Version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Tests (Mini-BEST) is used to evaluate balance in cases of balance impairment (e.g., Parkinson's disease, brain injury, vestibular disorders, stroke, or multiple sclerosis). The assessment consists of four sub-balance systems with 14 items each scored 0, 1, or 2 depending on performance, ranging from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating better balance. The four sub-balance systems included in the test are Anticipatory postural adjustments, Reactive postural control, Sensory orientation and Dynamic gait.
Walking speed was assessed using the 10 m walk test, which involves walking a distance of 14 meters at a comfortable speed and recording the time taken from the second to the twelfth meter in order to calculate the walking speed of the case, with the use of a walking aid if necessary.
The gait assessment will record the parameters of walking and assess them using the Tinetti Mobility Test (TMT). The TMT is used to assess the gait performance of elderly people, people with Parkinson's disease, brain injury, stroke or multiple sclerosis. The assessment is performed by asking the patient to walk a distance of 25 feet in a straight line at a comfortable speed. The administrator can either directly observe or video-record the gait of the patient, or use a walking aid if necessary. The assessment includes the observation of hesitancy to start walking, height of the raised foot, gait length, gait symmetry, continuity of stride, walking path, trunk stability, and width of stride, with a score of 0, 1, or 2 for each item. Each item was scored as 0, 1 or 2, ranging from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating a more problem-free gait.
Quality of life is assessed using the short version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8). The PDQ8 is a self-completion questionnaire with eight questions covering eight domains, including activities of daily living, exercise, cognition, social support, communication, emotional well-being, shame, and feelings of physical discomfort, with the lower the score, the better the quality of life and health.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jui-chi Hsu
- Phone Number: 523504 +886-5326151
- Email: jchsu@hch.gov.tw
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jui-chi Hsu
- Phone Number: +886-937138061
- Email: reachel33@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hsinchu, Taiwan
- Recruiting
- National Taiwan University Hospital HsinChu Branch
-
Contact:
- Jui-chi Hsu
- Phone Number: 523504 +886-3526151
- Email: jchsu@hch.gov.tw
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Hoehn-Yahr classification 2 to 3
- Regular compliance with medication program
- Stable medical condition and vital signs, conscious
- Be able to follow instructions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment or dementia who are unable to cooperate with therapy or functional assessment
- Patients with musculoskeletal injuries or surgeries that have resulted in limited mobility
- Patients with physician-diagnosed cardiorespiratory disorders with activity limitations
- Patients with acute neurological disorders.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: exercise
Exercise group will perform 50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks
|
50 minutes of exercise twice a week, including stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises for 5 weeks
|
|
Other: education
The patient will be given a one-time exercise education session and a 50-minute video that included stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises that could be practiced at home.
|
The patient will be given a one-time exercise education session and a 50-minute video that included stretching, core exercises, gross motor movements and balance exercises that could be practiced at home.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
postural alignment of frontal and sagittal plance
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
The angles of Flexion and Side-bending of the trunk in degrees
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
range of motion of trunk flexion and side-bending
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
The range of motion of trunk flexion and side-bending will be evaluated in degrees
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Supine to and from sitting
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
The time of supine to and from sitting is measured in seconds
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analogue Scale of low back pain
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
It is a scale from 0 to 10.
The higher score means the patient has more severe pain.
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
The Shortened Version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Tests (Mini-BEST)
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
It is a scale from 0 to 28.
The higher score means the patient has no impairment in their balance.
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
10 meter gait speed
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
the speed of gait is measured in meters per second
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Tinetti Mobility Test (TMT)
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
It is a scale from 0 to 12.
The higher score means the patient has a better gait pattern.
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
the short version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
quality of life will be measured by the PDQ-8.
It is a scale from 0-32.
The higher scale means the patient has worse quality of life.
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
|
Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)
Time Frame: before and immediately after the intervention
|
It is a scale from 16 to 64.
The higher score means the patient is more afraid of falling down.
|
before and immediately after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar.
- Barone P, Santangelo G, Amboni M, Pellecchia MT, Vitale C. Pisa syndrome in Parkinson's disease and parkinsonism: clinical features, pathophysiology, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Sep;15(10):1063-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30173-9. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
- Norkin, C.C. and D.J. White, Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 5th ed. 2017: F.A.Davis.
- Vaugoyeau M, Viallet F, Aurenty R, Assaiante C, Mesure S, Massion J. Axial rotation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;77(7):815-21. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.050666. Epub 2006 Mar 30. Erratum In: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;77(8):1000.
- Schenkman M, Cutson TM, Kuchibhatla M, Chandler J, Pieper CF, Ray L, Laub KC. Exercise to improve spinal flexibility and function for people with Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Oct;46(10):1207-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb04535.x.
- Duncan RP, Leddy AL, Cavanaugh JT, Dibble LE, Ellis TD, Ford MP, Foreman KB, Earhart GM. Comparative utility of the BESTest, mini-BESTest, and brief-BESTest for predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease: a cohort study. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):542-50. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120302. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
- Lindholm B, Nilsson MH, Hansson O, Hagell P. The clinical significance of 10-m walk test standardizations in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol. 2018 Aug;265(8):1829-1835. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8921-9. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
- Kegelmeyer DA, Kloos AD, Thomas KM, Kostyk SK. Reliability and validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for individuals with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2007 Oct;87(10):1369-78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070007. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
- Peto V, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R. PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures. J Neurol. 1998 May;245 Suppl 1:S10-4. doi: 10.1007/pl00007730.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202307076RIND
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson Disease (PD) | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseTurkey (Türkiye)
-
CND Life SciencesDigestive Disease Associates of CTRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseUnited States
-
Neuron23 Inc.Roche Diagnostic Ltd.; Qiagen Manchester LimitedRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Idiopathic Parkinson Disease | Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic | Early Parkinson Disease (Early PD)United States, Spain, Israel, Poland, Italy, United Kingdom
-
San Francisco Neurology and Sleep CenterRecruitingPARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson s DiseaseUnited States
-
Haukeland University HospitalUniversity of Bergen; SPARK NSRecruitingParkinson Disease (PD) | Parkinson s DiseaseNorway
-
Università degli Studi dell'InsubriaUniversidade Nova de Lisboa; Associazione Parkinson Insubria (AsPI), Section... and other collaboratorsRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson Disease, Idiopathic | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)Italy
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityIstanbul University - CerrahpasaNot yet recruitingParkinson Disease | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Parkinson Disease (PD), Postural Balance
-
CND Life SciencesOregon Health and Science UniversityRecruitingParkinson Disease | Parkinson | Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)United States
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedParkinson Disease 6, Early-Onset | Parkinson Disease (Autosomal Recessive, Early Onset) 7, Human | Parkinson Disease Autosomal Recessive, Early Onset | Parkinson Disease, Autosomal Recessive Early-Onset, Digenic, Pink1/Dj1United States
-
Duke UniversityMedical University of South Carolina; Massachusetts General Hospital; Mayo Clinic and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingGut Microbiota | Gut Microbiome | Parkinson Disease (PD) | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder) | Prodromal Parkinsons DiseaseUnited States
Clinical Trials on exercise
-
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and...TerminatedTraumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
University of Texas, El PasoRecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Pain Chronic | Central Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Aksaray University Training and Research HospitalCompletedExercise Training | Lactate Blood Increase | Cognitive Functions | BDNFTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteCompletedAcute Myeloid LeukemiaCanada
-
University College CorkRecruitingDepressive Disorder, MajorIreland
-
Sahmyook UniversityRecruitingChronic Nonspecific Neck PainKorea, Republic of
-
Uskudar UniversityCompleted
-
Yuksek Ihtisas UniversityCompletedDementia | Frailty | Cognitive Function | Reaction Time | Aerobic Exercise | Balance ExerciseTurkey
-
National Taiwan Normal UniversityCompletedAging | Cognitive DeclineTaiwan
-
Wayne State UniversityUnknown