Osseodensification in Enhancing Implant Stability and Ridge Expansion in Esthetic Region

October 30, 2024 updated by: Hams Hamed Abdelrahman

Effectiveness of Osseodensification in Enhancing Implant Stability and Ridge Expansion in Esthetic Region (a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Dental implants supported restorations have been widely accepted as one of the treatment modalities to replace missing teeth and to restore human masticatory function. Successful osseointegration from the clinical standpoint is a measured by implant stability, which occurs after implant integration. Osseodensification is a bio-mechanical site preparation technique. It utilizes a multi-fluted densifying bur technology that creates and expands a pilot hole without excavating significant amounts of bone tissue through a unique, highly controllable, fast, and efficient procedure with minimal heat elevation.

Aim of the study: Is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of using osseodensification compared to conventional bone expansion in implant stability and ridge expansion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Outpatient Clinic of Periodontology and Oral medicine Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Missing maxillary anterior tooth, having moderate horizontal ridge defect in which the alveolar ridge width is( 3-4) mm, and its height is not less than 10 mm.
  • Presence of adequate keratinized mucosa.
  • Patients with good oral hygiene.
  • Patients are free from any systemic diseases that might affect healing.
  • Presence of adequate inter-occlusal and mesiodistal space that permits placement of fixed prosthesis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heavy smokers and bad oral hygiene patients.
  • Medically compromised patients that affecting placement of implant.
  • Alcohol or drug abuse.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients suffering from osteoporosis.
  • Current chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group

No. 1 Microdent expander will be placed and screwed slowely (to avoid heat generation) into the osteotomy site till reaching the full desired length.

N0. 2 microdent expander will be placed and screwed into the osteotomy site as the same step.

Then no. 3 Microdent expander will be inserted for placing 3.5mm implant diameter

Other Names:
  • Conventional manual bone expanders
Experimental: Study group

Drill no. VT1525 (2mm) of densah burs will be used first in counter clockwise (in the osteotomy site).

Then drill no. VT2535 (3mm) of densah burs will be used in counter clockwise to put 3.5mm implant diameter.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in implant stability
Time Frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Implant stability will be measured using the Ostell device.
Baseline and 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in bone density
Time Frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
The patients will be examined radiographically using CBCT
Baseline and 16 weeks
Change in ridge expansion
Time Frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
The patients will be examined radiographically using CBCT
Baseline and 16 weeks
Change in bone loss
Time Frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
The patients will be examined radiographically using CBCT
Baseline and 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0105-12

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant

Clinical Trials on Osseodesification densah burs

Subscribe