- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05712031
Combined Tooth-implant Supported Prostheses (CTISP)
Clinical Evaluation of Combined Tooth-implant Supported Prosthesis: Controlled Prospective Clinical Study
The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate clinical performance of combined tooth-implant supported 3 unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible and was to compare and evaluate them with the complications of 3 unit fixed partial dentures supported with free standing dental implants.The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
1.Is there any difference in terms of mechanical and biological complications as well as marginal bone level between free standing and combined tooth-implant supported 3 unit Fixed Partial Dentures in posterior mandible.
Participants will receive either 2 dental implants(Control group) or 1 standart length dental implants to be combine with abutment tooth or 1 short dental implant to be combine with abutment tooth for supporting 3 unit fixed partial dentures.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical performance of combined tooth-implant supported 3 unit fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible and was to compare and evaluate them with the complications of 3 unit fixed partial dentures supported with free standing dental implants.
Material and methods: 78 partially edentulous patients in the posterior mandible (Kennedy 1 and Kennedy 2), age between 18-65 with no systemic disorders were recruited for the study (n=26). Group 1served as control group and received 2 dental implants for supporting 3 unit fixed partial dentures (FPD). In group 2 dental implants longer than 8 mm and in group 3 shorter than 8 mm were inserted to replace first or second molar combined with first or second premolar respectively to support cement retained 3 units FPD. Periapical radiographs were taken with parallel technique for evaluation of marginal bone resorption (CBL) and modified plaque index (MPI), bleeding index (BI) and sulcus depth of abutment teeth was recorded at the time of FPD insertion, 6 months after FPD insertion and annually. Abutment tooth intrusions, de-cementation of the restoration, porcelain chipping/delamination, framework fracture, abutment screw loosening, abutment and abutment screw fracture, implant fracture were also recorded as complications.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with no systemic disorders,
- Partial edentulous in the posterior mandible unilaterally or bilaterally with maxillary arch fully dentate or have teeth and/or implant supported FPD,
- At least 3 months of healing after tooth extraction on implant site,
- Periodontally and endodontically healthy abutment tooth to be combined with implant,
- Patients who have good oral hygiene habits,
- Patients smoking less than 10 cigarettes/day,
- More than 2mm of keratinized gingiva on implant site
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Group2
Mandibular first or second premolar is combined with standard length(8-12mm) dental implants to support 3 unit Fixed Partial Dentures
|
Nucleoss T4 dental implants is combined with first or second premolar to support 3 unit fixed partial dentures
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Group3
Mandibular first or second premolar is combined with short dental implants(5-6mm) to support 3 unit Fixed Partial Dentures
|
Nucleoss T5 dental implants is combined with first or second premolar to support 3 unit fixed partial dentures
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group1
Standard length (8-12mm) dental implants are inserted in posterior mandible replacing either first premolar and first molar or second premolar and second molar to support 3 unit fixed partial dentures.
|
2 freestanding Nucleoss T4 dental implants is used to support 3 unit fixed partial dentures
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Mesial and distal marginal bone loss around dental implants is measured by periodical radiographs
|
At baseline
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Mesial and distal marginal bone loss around dental implants is measured by periodical radiographs
|
6 months
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Mesial and distal marginal bone loss around dental implants is measured by periodical radiographs
|
1 year
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Mesial and distal marginal bone loss around dental implants is measured by periodical radiographs
|
2 years
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Mesial and distal marginal bone loss around dental implants is measured by periodical radiographs
|
3 years
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Mesial and distal marginal bone loss around dental implants is measured by periodical radiographs
|
4 years
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Mesial and distal marginal bone loss around dental implants is measured by periodical radiographs
|
5 years
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 6 years
|
Mesial and distal marginal bone loss around dental implants is measured by periodical radiographs
|
6 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Modified gingival index
Time Frame: At baseline
|
The clinician evaluated bleeding around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores between 0 and 3
|
At baseline
|
Modified gingival index
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The clinician evaluated bleeding around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores between 0 and 3
|
6 months
|
Modified gingival index
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The clinician evaluated bleeding around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores between 0 and 3
|
1 year
|
Modified gingival index
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The clinician evaluated bleeding around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores between 0 and 3
|
2 years
|
Modified gingival index
Time Frame: 3 years
|
The clinician evaluated bleeding around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores between 0 and 3
|
3 years
|
Modified gingival index
Time Frame: 4 years
|
The clinician evaluated bleeding around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores between 0 and 3
|
4 years
|
Modified gingival index
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The clinician evaluated bleeding around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores between 0 and 3
|
5 years
|
Modified gingival index
Time Frame: 6 years
|
The clinician evaluated bleeding around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores between 0 and 3
|
6 years
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: At baseline
|
the clinician evaluated plaque accumulation around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores to buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces between 0 and 3
|
At baseline
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 6 months
|
the clinician evaluated plaque accumulation around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores to buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces between 0 and 3
|
6 months
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 1 year
|
the clinician evaluated plaque accumulation around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores to buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces between 0 and 3
|
1 year
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 2 years
|
the clinician evaluated plaque accumulation around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores to buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces between 0 and 3
|
2 years
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 3 years
|
the clinician evaluated plaque accumulation around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores to buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces between 0 and 3
|
3 years
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 4 years
|
the clinician evaluated plaque accumulation around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores to buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces between 0 and 3
|
4 years
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 5 years
|
the clinician evaluated plaque accumulation around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores to buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces between 0 and 3
|
5 years
|
Plaque index
Time Frame: 6 years
|
the clinician evaluated plaque accumulation around selected teeth using a periodontal probe and by giving scores to buccal, lingual, mesial and distal surfaces between 0 and 3
|
6 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: ORHUN EKREN, PhD, Cukurova University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Meffert RM, Langer B, Fritz ME. Dental implants: a review. J Periodontol. 1992 Nov;63(11):859-70. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.859.
- Rameh S, Menhall A, Younes R. Key factors influencing short implant success. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;24(3):263-275. doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00841-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
- Zarb GA, Lewis DW. Dental implants and decision making. J Dent Educ. 1992 Dec;56(12):863-72.
- Al-Omiri MK, Al-Masri M, Alhijawi MM, Lynch E. Combined Implant and Tooth Support: An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Overview. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:6024565. doi: 10.1155/2017/6024565. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
- de Paula GA, Silva GC, Vilaca EL, Cornacchia TM, de Magalhaes CS, Moreira AN. Biomechanical Behavior of Tooth-Implant Supported Prostheses With Different Implant Connections: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. Implant Dent. 2018 Jun;27(3):294-302. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000737.
- Tsouknidas A, Giannopoulos D, Savvakis S, Michailidis N, Lympoudi E, Fytanidis D, Pissiotis A, Michalakis K. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Nov/Dec;31(6):e143-e154. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5254.
- Hosny M, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Naert I. Within-subject comparison between connected and nonconnected tooth-to-implant fixed partial prostheses: up to 14-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont. 2000 Jul-Aug;13(4):340-6.
- Naert IE, Duyck JA, Hosny MM, Van Steenberghe D. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients. Part I: An up to 15-years clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Jun;12(3):237-44. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003237.x.
- Gunne J, Astrand P, Lindh T, Borg K, Olsson M. Tooth-implant and implant supported fixed partial dentures: a 10-year report. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 May-Jun;12(3):216-21.
- Nickenig HJ, Schafer C, Spiekermann H. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17(5):506-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01259.x.
- Schwartz SR. Short Implants: An Answer to a Challenging Dilemma? Dent Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;64(2):279-290. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2019.11.001. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
- Benlidayi ME, Ucar Y, Tatli U, Ekren O, Evlice B, Kisa HI, Baksi U. Short Implants Versus Standard Implants: Midterm Outcomes of a Clinical Study. Implant Dent. 2018 Feb;27(1):95-100. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000710.
- Jung RE, Al-Nawas B, Araujo M, Avila-Ortiz G, Barter S, Brodala N, Chappuis V, Chen B, De Souza A, Almeida RF, Fickl S, Finelle G, Ganeles J, Gholami H, Hammerle C, Jensen S, Jokstad A, Katsuyama H, Kleinheinz J, Kunavisarut C, Mardas N, Monje A, Papaspyridakos P, Payer M, Schiegnitz E, Smeets R, Stefanini M, Ten Bruggenkate C, Vazouras K, Weber HP, Weingart D, Windisch P. Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:69-77. doi: 10.1111/clr.13342.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Orhun ekren
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Implant
-
Università degli Studi di SassariDr. Dario Melodia; Dr. Milena Pisano; Prof. Silvio Mario Meloni; Prof. Edoardo... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
-
Università degli Studi di SassariDr. Dario Melodia; Dr. Milena Pisano; Dr. Aurea Lumbau; Prof. Silvio Mario Meloni; Prof. Edoardo BaldoniNot yet recruiting
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalCompletedDental Implant Failed | Osseointegration Failure of Dental ImplantTurkey
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedDental Implant | Soft Tissue Augmentation | Immediate Dental ImplantUnited States
-
Biotech DentalRecruitingDental Implant | Dental Restoration | Dentistry | Implant-supported Fixed ProsthesisFrance
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedDental Implant Failed | Pre-osseointegration Failure of Dental ImplantBrazil
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityRecruitingDental Implant Failed | Implant ComplicationEgypt
-
Qassim UniversityCompletedDental Implant | Dental ExtractionSaudi Arabia
-
Ahram Canadian UniversityAl Hayah University in CairoRecruitingDental Implantation | Dental Implant | Surgical Dental ProsthesesEgypt
-
DSP Industrial LtdaRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Insertion of 1 Nucleoss T4 dental implants in posterior mandible
-
Clark StanfordWithdrawn
-
Implantology InstituteActive, not recruitingCompare Subperiosteal and Loco-Regional Anesthesia in Posterior Mandible Dental Implant InstallationAnesthesia Morbidity | Dental Implant Failed | Anesthesia Complications | Surgical Complications From Local AnesthesiaPortugal