- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06672679
Juntos: A Pilot Test of a Dating Violence Intervention for Latine Families
January 20, 2026 updated by: Maya Ragavan, University of Pittsburgh
Juntos Latine Dating Violence Prevention Intervention Pilot
In this trial, we will be pilot-testing a family-based dating violence prevention program for Latine caregivers and adolescents.
Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive a community-based 6 week intervention or to a wait-list control where they will receive a resource guide.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
41
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- Primary Care Center
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15216
- Casa San Jose
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Adolescents
- Between the ages of 12-16
- Identify as Hispanic or Latino/a/x/e
- Speaks Spanish or English
- Lives within 50 miles of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Has a participating parent or caregiver* in the study
Adults
- Over the age of 18
- Identifies as Hispanic or Latino/a/x/e
- Speaks Spanish
- Lives within 50 miles of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Is a caregiver of a participating adolescent in the study
- Was born outside of the United States
Exclusion Criteria:
- Does not meet inclusion criteria
- Unable to consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Juntos intervention
In the Juntos intervention, 24 caregiver-adolescent dyads will receive a 6 week family-based dating violence prevention intervention called Juntos.
Juntos includes 6 in-person sessions and 5 at home activities and was developed by Latino caregiver-adolescent dyads.
Topics include cultural values and practices, talking about dating and dating violence, rule-setting, understanding signs of healthy and unhealthy relationships, and resources for support.
|
6 week family-based intervention
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
The control arm will resource a resource guide and can be placed on a wait list to receive the intervention after the intervention is complete
|
Active control arm will receive a resource guide
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability
Time Frame: weekly for 6 weeks, after each intervention session
|
Acceptability Intervention Measure (scored on a Likert scale, 1 to 5 with 1 being completely disagree and 5 being completely agree).
4 items will be averaged for a summary score with higher numbers meaning higher acceptability.
|
weekly for 6 weeks, after each intervention session
|
|
Feasibility
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1 week post-intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
%participants who are enrolled, %consented, % randomized, % completed baseline, follow up and 3 month follow up surveys
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1 week post-intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-efficacy in preventing dating violence
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1 week post-intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
11 item measure scored on a Likert scale to assess self-efficacy in preventing dating violence.
Score for 7 items is on a 4 point Likert scale with 1: not at all confident and 4: very confident and the score for the other 3 items is 1 to 5 with 1: strongly disagree and 5: strongly agree.
We will create a summary score which is the average of these 7 items, with higher numbers meaning higher self-efficacy around preventing dating violence.
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1 week post-intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
|
Motivation to preventing dating violence
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
4 item measure scored on Likert scale focused on motivation caregivers and adolescents have around preventing dating violence.
0=not at all important and 10=very important.
We will great a summary score which is an average of the 4 items, with a higher score indicating higher motivation around preventing dating violence.
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
|
Attitudes around dating violence
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
12 item measure assessing participants' attituding around dating violence scored on a Likert scale.
1: Not abusive: 2: a little abusive; 3: somewhat abusive; 4: very abusive; 5: extremely abusive.
We will create a summary score which is an average of the 12 items, which higher scores indicating believing that the behaviors are more abusive
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
|
Caregiver-adolescent communication around dating violence
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
5 item measure scored on Likert scale assessing communication around dating violence.
0: never; 1: once; and 2: more than once.
We will create a summary scare which is an average of the 5 items with higher numbers indicating more conversations.
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
|
Parental monitoring
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
Scale around dating and dating violence specific parental monitoring.
This scale includes 6 items around time and resources scores on a 5 point Likert scale with 1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree; 2 items around parental knowledge of child's dating partner which is scored on a 5 point Likert scale with 1: strongly disagree and 5: strongly agree; 3 items around dating rule setting which is score on a 5 point Likert scale from 1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree and 4 items around child disclosure of dating violence scored on a 5 point Likert scale from 1:strongly disagree to 5; strongly agree.
We will great a summary scale which is the average of the measures, with higher numbers indicating more parental monitoring.
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
|
Adolescent relationship abuse victimization (whether someone has experienced violence)
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
25 item measure to assess experiences of physical, emotional, sexual, economic, and digital dating violence (0=never experienced; 1=experienced but not in the last year; and 2=experienced in the last year)
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
|
Adolescent relationship abuse perpetration (whether someone has used violence)
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
25 item measure to assess experiences of physical, emotional, sexual, economic, and digital dating violence perpetration (0=never experienced; 1=experienced but not in the last year; and 2=experienced in the last year)
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ethnic Identity
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
Multiethnic Identity Measure; 12 item scale on a 4 point Likert scale from 1: strongly disagree to 4: strongly agree.
Summary score of the average of 12 items with higher scores indicating more ethnic identity.
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
|
Acculturation conflict measure
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
7 item acculturation conflict measure (investigator developed) scored on a 4 point Likert Scale from 1: strongly disagree to 4: strongly agree.
A summary score of the average of the 7 items will be computed, with higher scores indicating more parent-adolescent acculturation conflict.
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
|
Discrimination Scale
Time Frame: baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
9 item Everyday Discrimination Scale scored on a 6 point Likert scale with 1: never to 6: every day.
A summary score (average of the 9 items) will be created with higher scores indicating more experiences of discrimination.
|
baseline (pre-intervention), 1-week post intervention follow up, 3 month post-intervention follow up surveys
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 30, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 1, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
November 4, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 21, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 20, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY24020165
- K23HD104925 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Due to the sensitivity of the survey data, we will not share individual patient data
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parent
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterCase Western Reserve UniversityTerminatedParent Stress | Parent Engagement | Parent AttachmentUnited States
-
University of AmsterdamRecruitingParent-child Problem | Parent Training | Parent Child RelationshipNetherlands
-
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustCarol Hardy, Research Lead, South London and Maudsley NHS FoundationCompletedChild Development | Parent Child Relationships | Parent Child InteractionsUnited Kingdom
-
University of NottinghamUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust; Lincolnshire...Not yet recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Autism | Parent | Autism Disorder | Autism in Children | Parent Stress | Parent Mental Health | Autism Disorders and Maternal Stress | Parent SupportUnited Kingdom
-
The University of Hong KongCompleted
-
JW Life ScienceCompleted
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityNot yet recruitingStress | Bruxism | Parent Stress | Parent and Child StressTurkey (Türkiye)
-
IRIS Media IncNot yet recruitingParent-Child Relations | Child Behavior | Parenting Behavior | Parent Management Training
-
Government College University FaisalabadActive, not recruitingParent-Child RelationsPakistan
-
University of OttawaWithdrawnParent-Child RelationsCanada
Clinical Trials on Juntos
-
University of RochesterNational Institute on Aging (NIA); University of North Carolina, CharlotteCompletedCaregivers of People With DementiaUnited States
-
University of MiamiNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedObesity | Sedentary Behavior | Diet, Healthy | Activity, MotorUnited States
-
University of MiamiNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingObesity | Diet, Healthy | Activity, MotorUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedMild Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
University of MiamiNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
Boston Medical CenterDeborah Munroe Noonan Memorial Research FundActive, not recruiting
-
University of Texas at AustinNot yet recruitingAlcohol Use, Underage