INtraprocedural Feedback-Optimized Renal Denervation Based on Measurements Obtained Through Renal Artery Stimulation: a Randomized Controlled Trial (INFORM) (INFORM)

November 4, 2024 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

INtraprocedural Feedback-Optimized Renal Denervation Based on Measurements Obtained Through Renal Artery Stimulation: a Randomized Controlled Proof-of-concept Trial to Assess Whether Renal Denervation Guided by Renal Artery Stimulation Outperforms Conventional Renal Denervation in 6-month Ambulatory Blood Pressure Reductions

Our previous study (Huang HC, Pan HY, Wang TD, Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:e012779) demonstrated that when renal artery stimulation continues to trigger systolic blood pressure increases (>=20 mmHg increase compared to baseline) after the initial procedure, patients show poor blood pressure reduction 6 months following renal denervation. Based on this finding, we designed a proof-of-concept trial comparing two approaches: a guided strategy versus conventional renal denervation. In the guided strategy, we perform additional ablations of main and/or branch renal arteries if immediate post-procedure stimulation still elevates systolic blood pressure (>=20 mmHg increase compared to baseline). The conventional approach involves no repeat procedures. This trial aims to determine whether the guided strategy leads to better clinical outcomes, measured by 6-month ambulatory blood pressure changes, and to establish the value of using intraprocedural feedback to assess and guide renal denervation treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  1. Anesthesia: Intravenous propofol to achieve adequate sedation throughout the course.
  2. Renal artery stimulation (RAS) will be performed at 2 sites (proximal and distal main renal artery) in both renal arteries. Pacing frequency was set at 10 Hz, pacing output at 20 mA with a pulse duration of 10 ms, and duration of 60 sec based on earlier researches. The maximal systolic blood pressure rise and branch renal artery constriction since the start of RAS till 3 minutes after its discontinuation will be recorded. The body reaction during RAS will be recorded (0, no response; 1, mild (voice) response; 2. limited movement; 3. significant movement).
  3. Renal denervation (RDN) will be performed using the multielectrode Symplicity Spyral RDN catheter. The multielectrode RDN catheter contains 4 electrodes separated from each other in a spiral configuration. Up to 4 discrete radiofrequency (RF) ablations were applied simultaneously. Each application lasts ≤60 s with a power ≤8 Watts (W) and a target temperature of ≤70°C (158°F). Electrodes that do not reach the therapeutic temperature or impedance drop are automatically switched off.
  4. Post RDN renal artery stimulation:

After RDN completed, renal artery stimulation will be repeated immediately. The maximal RAS-induced SBP changes will be recorded. All BP readings are the average of 8 consecutive beats by default (Siemens, Germany), which could minimize the inadvertent BP fluctuations by movements and respiration (8 beats could encompass at least one respiratory cycle). The branch renal artery constriction since the start of RAS till 3 minutes after its discontinuation will be recorded. The body reaction during RAS will be recorded (0, no response; 1, mild (voice) response; 2. limited movement; 3. significant movement).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

32

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Taipei City, Taiwan, 100225
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tzung-Dau Wang, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hypertension and are willing to undergo renal denervation.
  • Patients are treated with antihypertensive medications, or with an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg, and 24-hour SBP of >130 mmHg or DBP >80 mm Hg, irrespective of antihypertensive treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An unsuitable renal artery anatomy for renal denervation, assessed by computed tomographic angiography (main renal artery lumen diameter <3 mm or a total length <20 mm).
  • Secondary hypertension, including hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, and renal artery stenosis (>50% stenosis in one or both arteries).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: A: Renal artery stimulation-induced systolic blood pressure rise suppressed (<20 mmHg)
No further renal denervation after standard renal denervation procedure
Active Comparator: B: Re-denervation if renal artery stimulation-induced systolic blood pressure rise not suppressed
Another round of renal denervation (main renal artery for positive proximal stimulation; branch artery for positive distal stimulation) after standard renal denervation. The definition of non-suppressed is systolic blood pressure rise >=20 mmHg compared to baseline.
Re-denervation according to the site where renal artery stimulation can induce systolic blood pressure rise of >= 20 mmHg. Main renal artery denervation if proximal main renal artery stimulation positive, while branch renal artery denervation if distal main renal artery stimulation positive.
Placebo Comparator: C: Control if renal artery stimulation-induced systolic blood pressure rise not suppressed
No further renal denervation after standard renal denervation. The definition of non-suppressed is systolic blood pressure rise >=20 mmHg compared to baseline.
No further renal denervation after standard renal denervation even renal artery stimulation-induced systolic blood pressure rise >= 20 mmHg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
24-hour systolic blood pressure reduction (compared to baseline)
Time Frame: 6 months following the index renal denervation
6 months following the index renal denervation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
24-hour diastolic blood pressure reduction (compared to baseline)
Time Frame: 6 months following the index renal denervation
6 months following the index renal denervation
Awake and asleep systolic/diastolic blood pressure and heart rate changes (compared to baseline)
Time Frame: 6 months following the index renal denervation
6 months following the index renal denervation
Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate changes
Time Frame: 6 months following the index renal denervation
6 months following the index renal denervation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
24-hour blood pressure changes based on branch artery constriction following renal artery stimulation
Time Frame: 6 months following the index renal denervation
6 months following the index renal denervation
24-hour blood pressure reduction (compared to baseline)
Time Frame: 1 year and 2 years following the index renal denervation
1 year and 2 years following the index renal denervation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tzung-Dau Wang, MD, PhD, National Taiwan University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 14, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 202405100RIPE
  • ERP-2023-13518 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Medtronic)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Under reasonable request and approved by the principle investigator, the information could be shared.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Subscribe