Radiofrequency and Exercise-based Rehabilitation on Symptoms Associated With Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions in Breast Cancer

January 20, 2026 updated by: SERGIO MONTERO NAVARRO

Effectiveness of Radiofrequency and Exercise-based Rehabilitation on Symptoms Associated With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Patients.

Breast cancer has a high impact, affecting 2.3 million women worldwide in 2022. In Spain, there were 40,203 new cases in 2023. In addition to the economic and social costs, patients suffer genitourinary dysfunctions due to cancer treatments. Genitourinary Menopausal Syndrome (GUS) affects 50% of menopausal women, with a higher prevalence in women with breast cancer.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency (RF) and pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFMT) in the treatment of pelvic dysfunction associated with GUS in breast cancer patients. A randomised, double-blind clinical trial will be conducted in collaboration with the Association of Women Affected by Breast Cancer of Elche and Region) and the CEU Cardenal Herrera University. Women diagnosed with breast cancer and pelvic dysfunction will participate, divided into three groups: one will receive PFMT, one will receive RF and one will receive PFMT+RF therapy.

Both techniques are expected to improve the quality of life of patients, where RF could offer additional benefits due to its proven effectiveness in the treatment of vaginal dryness and dyspareunia. The expected results will contribute to more effective and less invasive treatment protocols. The project presented has the potential to positively impact the health and well-being of women with breast cancer, reducing the symptoms associated with the disease and its treatment, and improving their quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

117

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Spain / Valencia
      • Elche, Spain / Valencia, Spain, 46113
        • Recruiting
        • Cardenal Herrera - Ceu
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • CRISTINA ORTS-RUIZ, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • JESÚS SÁNCHEZ-MAS, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • CRISTINA SALAR-ANDREU, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • SERGIO MONTERO-NAVARRO, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • MARÍA TORRES-LACOMBA, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • JOSEP CARLES BENITEZ-MARTÍNEZ, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • ANA LOZANO-RUBIO, MsC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • MARIE RIQUIER, MsC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women of legal age with a clinical history of breast cancer, who agree to participate in the study and who present pelvic dysfunction assessed by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI20) ≥ 100
  • women survivors of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer
  • A medical discharge was granted more than one year ago
  • A diagnosis of another type of cancer has not been made.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having performed PMFT or received RF in the last 12 months
  • Use of vaginal oestrogens in the last 6 months
  • Systemic hormone therapy in the last 6 months
  • Laser therapy in the last 6 months
  • Absence of pelvic floor contraction according to the Modified Oxford Scale
  • Use of pacemaker
  • Use of heart pacemaker, decompensated heart or metabolic diseases, cognitive deficits, peripheral or central neurological disorders, previous surgeries in the pelvic region, skin pathologies or wounds in the treatment area or presence of an active urinary tract and/or vaginal infection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Temperature after apply RF in capacitive electrical transfer mode (Capernergy® device model C500)
It is a device designed mainly to address dysfunctions in the urogynecological area, where the increase in tissue temperature is regulated by a temperature sensor, with 3 frequencies (0.8MHz, 1MHz and 1.2 MHz) that will allow different tissue depths to be addressed, and a power of 310w. This device consists of two electrodes: an active capacitive electrode to be placed in the vaginal area with a probe cover and water-soluble gel and another dispersive electrode or return plate to be positioned in the lumbosacral region.
For this manometry the air probe, connected to the Phenix biofeedback system, covered by a latex probe cover lubricated with gel, will be used. In the procedure, the labia majora are opened with one hand and slowly rotated into the vagina while holding the back of the manometric probe with the other hand. Basal tone in g will be measured prior to pelvic floor muscles force measurements. The manometry probe will extract pelvic floor pressure signals by measuring both your basal tone and the maximum pressure held for 10 seconds in three measurements, the average of the three being calculated at the command, 'contract as hard as you can for as long as possible'.
This questionnaire allows assessment of the impact of urinary symptoms, colo-rectal-anal symptoms and genital prolapse symptoms. This questionnaire will also be used as an inclusion criterion, to homogenise the characteristics of the population in terms of pelvic dysfunction prior to the intervention, as indicated above.
a four-question self-administered questionnaire that identifies individuals with urinary incontinence by assessing frequency, severity and impact on quality of life. It is composed of five questions assessing frequency, severity and impact of UI, plus a set of eight self-diagnostic items related to UI situations experienced by patients. The maximum sum of the response values indicates a score of 21 points, referring to the high impact of UI on an individual's life.
It provides information on the severity of the UI by means of two questions. The interpretation based on the score is classified as: 1-2 mild UI, 3-6 moderate UI, 8-9 severe UI, 12 very severe UI.
this index consists of a graduated scale from 1 to 5 for each item (vaginal elasticity, fluid volume, pH, epithelial integrity and moisture).Vaginal elasticity ranges from 1 (no elasticity) to 5 (excellent elasticity), assessed by distension of the mucosa on palpation and speculum placement. The volume of fluid, assessed during inspection, varies between 1 (no discharge) and 5 (normal discharge) (white flocculent). The integrity of the epithelium varies between 1 (petechiae already detected on inspection) and 5 (non-friable tissue and normal mucosa). Moisture ranges from 1 (no moisture detected on inspection and presence of inflamed mucosa) to 5 (normal moisture). The pH will be quantified using a pH indicator strip between 0 and 14 (MColorpHast™-PH indicator strips) to be placed directly on the right lateral vaginal wall for one minute, giving 1 point for pH 6.1, 2 for pH 5.6-6.0, 3 for pH 5.1-5.5, 4 for pH 4.7-5.0 and 5 for pH ≤ 4.6. The sum of all items represents the vaginal health
This scale allows the intensity of pain described by the patient to be measured with maximum reproducibility between observers. It consists of a horizontal line of 10 centimetres, at the ends of which are the extreme expressions of a symptom. At the left end is the absence or lowest intensity and at the right end the highest intensity. The patient is asked to mark on the line the point that indicates the intensity of the pain during sexual intercourse and it is measured with a millimetres ruler. The intensity is expressed in centimetres or millimetres. The rating will be: 1 Mild pain if the patient scores the pain as less than 3; 2 Moderate pain if the rating is between 4 and 7; 3 Severe pain if the rating is equal to or greater than 8.
It consists of 10 items assessing various dimensions of body image in cancer patients, evaluating: affective, behavioural and cognitive. The items are scored on a four-point scale (0: not at all; 1: a little; 2: quite a lot; 3: a lot) with a maximum possible score of 3 points. The higher the score, the higher the body image problem. Its brevity facilitates rapid assessment in both clinical and research settings. It shows a stable factor structure between samples, and good psychometric properties with high reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.93), suggesting that it is a suitable and useful measure for assessing body image in breast cancer patients.
five-point Likert scale for satisfaction with treatment to be classified as: 1 (very dissatisfied), 2 (dissatisfied), 3 (no change), 4 (satisfied), 5 (very satisfied). Women who miss any of the RF sessions and/or whose attendance at the face-to-face physiotherapy sessions (RF and/or PFMT) does not reach 80% will be considered as not complying with the study protocol and their participation will be terminated, although they will be included in the analysis (by intention to treat).
It allows the contractile capacity of the pelvic floor muscles to be assessed. It scores from 0 to 5, as follows: if there is no contraction it is 0, if the contraction is very weak it is 1, if the contraction is weak it is 2, if the contraction is moderate/with tension/and maintained it is 3, if the contraction is good and maintains tension with resistance it is 4, and if the contraction is strong and maintains tension against a resistant force it is 5.
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire consists of 19 items that assess sexual function over the past 4 weeks and performance in six domains: sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain. A cut-off point ≤ 26.5 is considered sexual dysfunction and an increase in score is considered an improvement.
Experimental: PFMT

The PFMT will consist of a targeted programme, with a protocol of CORE and pelvic floor exercises established based on the assessment of the patients' strength, endurance and fatigue, with a frequency of twice a week led by a physiotherapist and a duration of 45 minutes each day and a period of 16 weeks.It will be carried out in groups of 8 people and accompanied by a physiotherapist experienced in therapeutic exercise.

Each session will consist of exercises to activate the pelvic floor muscles in isolation and in association with the CORE muscles, both static and dynamic.

For this manometry the air probe, connected to the Phenix biofeedback system, covered by a latex probe cover lubricated with gel, will be used. In the procedure, the labia majora are opened with one hand and slowly rotated into the vagina while holding the back of the manometric probe with the other hand. Basal tone in g will be measured prior to pelvic floor muscles force measurements. The manometry probe will extract pelvic floor pressure signals by measuring both your basal tone and the maximum pressure held for 10 seconds in three measurements, the average of the three being calculated at the command, 'contract as hard as you can for as long as possible'.
This questionnaire allows assessment of the impact of urinary symptoms, colo-rectal-anal symptoms and genital prolapse symptoms. This questionnaire will also be used as an inclusion criterion, to homogenise the characteristics of the population in terms of pelvic dysfunction prior to the intervention, as indicated above.
a four-question self-administered questionnaire that identifies individuals with urinary incontinence by assessing frequency, severity and impact on quality of life. It is composed of five questions assessing frequency, severity and impact of UI, plus a set of eight self-diagnostic items related to UI situations experienced by patients. The maximum sum of the response values indicates a score of 21 points, referring to the high impact of UI on an individual's life.
It provides information on the severity of the UI by means of two questions. The interpretation based on the score is classified as: 1-2 mild UI, 3-6 moderate UI, 8-9 severe UI, 12 very severe UI.
this index consists of a graduated scale from 1 to 5 for each item (vaginal elasticity, fluid volume, pH, epithelial integrity and moisture).Vaginal elasticity ranges from 1 (no elasticity) to 5 (excellent elasticity), assessed by distension of the mucosa on palpation and speculum placement. The volume of fluid, assessed during inspection, varies between 1 (no discharge) and 5 (normal discharge) (white flocculent). The integrity of the epithelium varies between 1 (petechiae already detected on inspection) and 5 (non-friable tissue and normal mucosa). Moisture ranges from 1 (no moisture detected on inspection and presence of inflamed mucosa) to 5 (normal moisture). The pH will be quantified using a pH indicator strip between 0 and 14 (MColorpHast™-PH indicator strips) to be placed directly on the right lateral vaginal wall for one minute, giving 1 point for pH 6.1, 2 for pH 5.6-6.0, 3 for pH 5.1-5.5, 4 for pH 4.7-5.0 and 5 for pH ≤ 4.6. The sum of all items represents the vaginal health
This scale allows the intensity of pain described by the patient to be measured with maximum reproducibility between observers. It consists of a horizontal line of 10 centimetres, at the ends of which are the extreme expressions of a symptom. At the left end is the absence or lowest intensity and at the right end the highest intensity. The patient is asked to mark on the line the point that indicates the intensity of the pain during sexual intercourse and it is measured with a millimetres ruler. The intensity is expressed in centimetres or millimetres. The rating will be: 1 Mild pain if the patient scores the pain as less than 3; 2 Moderate pain if the rating is between 4 and 7; 3 Severe pain if the rating is equal to or greater than 8.
It consists of 10 items assessing various dimensions of body image in cancer patients, evaluating: affective, behavioural and cognitive. The items are scored on a four-point scale (0: not at all; 1: a little; 2: quite a lot; 3: a lot) with a maximum possible score of 3 points. The higher the score, the higher the body image problem. Its brevity facilitates rapid assessment in both clinical and research settings. It shows a stable factor structure between samples, and good psychometric properties with high reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.93), suggesting that it is a suitable and useful measure for assessing body image in breast cancer patients.
five-point Likert scale for satisfaction with treatment to be classified as: 1 (very dissatisfied), 2 (dissatisfied), 3 (no change), 4 (satisfied), 5 (very satisfied). Women who miss any of the RF sessions and/or whose attendance at the face-to-face physiotherapy sessions (RF and/or PFMT) does not reach 80% will be considered as not complying with the study protocol and their participation will be terminated, although they will be included in the analysis (by intention to treat).
It allows the contractile capacity of the pelvic floor muscles to be assessed. It scores from 0 to 5, as follows: if there is no contraction it is 0, if the contraction is very weak it is 1, if the contraction is weak it is 2, if the contraction is moderate/with tension/and maintained it is 3, if the contraction is good and maintains tension with resistance it is 4, and if the contraction is strong and maintains tension against a resistant force it is 5.
The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire consists of 19 items that assess sexual function over the past 4 weeks and performance in six domains: sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain. A cut-off point ≤ 26.5 is considered sexual dysfunction and an increase in score is considered an improvement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PFDI-20 questionnaire (300 points)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention / a year post-intervention
This questionnaire assesses the impact over the last 3 months of urinary symptoms (Urinary Impact Questionnaire; UIQ-7), colorectal-anal symptoms (Colorectal-Anal Impact questionnaire, CRAIQ-7) and genital prolapse symptoms (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire, POPIQ-7). The maximum possible score is 300 points, with a maximum value of 100 points for each subscale. The higher the score, the greater the negative impact on quality of life.
Pre-intervention / a year post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age (years)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
Subject's age (years)
Pre-intervention
Sex (female or male)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
Subject's sex (female or male)
Pre-intervention
Body mass index (Kg /m2)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
It is a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult men and women
Pre-intervention
Pelvic floor muscle strength assessment (oxford scale 0-5 points)
Time Frame: pre-intervention / 15 days post-intervention / 6 months post-intervention / 12 months post-intervention
If there is no contraction it is rated 0, if the contraction is very weak it is rated 1, if the contraction is weak it is 2, if the contraction is moderate/with tension/and maintained it is 3, if the contraction is good and maintains tension with resistance it is 4, and if the contraction is strong and maintains tension against a resistant force it is 5. In addition, this assessment allows the determination of static muscular endurance, fatiguability or dynamic endurance and maximum muscular strength.
pre-intervention / 15 days post-intervention / 6 months post-intervention / 12 months post-intervention
neuromuscular stimulation device and PHENIX LIBERTY manometry (mmHg)
Time Frame: pre-intervention / 15 days post-intervention / 6 months post-intervention / 12 months post-intervention
pre-intervention / 15 days post-intervention / 6 months post-intervention / 12 months post-intervention
pH (0-14)
Time Frame: pre-intervention / 15 days post-intervention / 6 months post-intervention / 12 months post-intervention
The pH will be quantified using a pH indicator strip between 0 and 14 to be placed directly on the right lateral vaginal wall for one minute, giving 1 point for pH 6.1, 2 for pH 5.6-6.0, 3 for pH 5.1-5.5, 4 for pH 4.7-5.0 and 5 for pH ≤ 4.6. The sum of all items represents the vaginal health score, where 25 represents the best vaginal health.
pre-intervention / 15 days post-intervention / 6 months post-intervention / 12 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: CRISTINA ORTS-RUIZ, PhD, CARDENAL HERRERA - CEU; CEU UNIVERSITIES
  • Study Director: JESÚS SÁNCHEZ-MAS, PhD, CARDENAL HERRERA - CEU; CEU UNIVERSITIES
  • Principal Investigator: ANA LOZANO, MsC, CARDENAL HERRERA - CEU; CEU UNIVERSITIES

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The general data of the subject will be collected (name, age, sex, physical variables and clinical history). You must come to participate in our study with comfortable clothes.

The personal data are confidential, apply to the protection of personal data. The study will be carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with current Spanish legislation (Royal Decree 223/2004 and the Biomedical Research Act 2007) and any other thing that may be applicable.

An alpha-numeric code will be assigned to each participant. The study is double-blind. Only this code will be recorded by the evaluators.

This study was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of CEU Cardenal Herrera University (CEEI24/540).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 1 years after the publication of results

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe