SPiT-frequency I_Peri-implant Mucositis

December 11, 2024 updated by: Odd Carsten Koldsland, University of Oslo

This is an interventional clinical study on the peri-implant treatment necessary to improve the clinical conditions surrounding dental implants registered with peri-implant inflammation. The focus of this double-armed, examiner blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial is to examine the effect of short-term increased frequency of a SPiT (supportive peri-implant treatment) protocol on implants diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis.

The study is a part of a project assessing the frequency of supportive peri-implant therapy. The current is on treatment of peri-implant mucositis (inflammation and no attachment loss at the implants) and secondary prevention of peri-implant mucositis. The other study is a RCT on non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis (inflammation and exposed implant surface) (REK 790240). Exposure of rough surface may dramatically change the frequency of maintenance needed to improve the inflammatory condition. Thus, a segregation between adequate and low bone level at the implant is necessary.

Subjects with more than one implant and both diagnoses, may be enrolled in both studies, following the frequency of treatment randomized in the peri-implant mucositis study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

At the screening visit, the following tests and examination will be carried out to screen eligible subjects and provide baseline information for those patients that meet the study criteria:

  • Anamnestic information as described in the regular electronic dental journal at the Faculty of Dentistry is collected
  • Assessment of clinical registrations; suppuration, plaque, gingival bleeding, PPD, Bleeding index score and presence of keratinized mucosa
  • Assessment of existing radiographs to ensure the subject and implants are eligible according to inclusion criteria
  • Written and oral information on the study will be given
  • Thorough information and instruction in plaque control with tools deemed appropriate by the operator
  • Information about the study is given orally and written together with informed consent sheet

Visit 1 Baseline Signed inform consent is collected

An experienced, calibrated and board certified specialist in periodontology ("Examiner") performs the following clinical registrations at six sites (mesiobuccal, buccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, distolingual) of the included implants:

Plaque: the presence or absence recognized by running a probe across the marginal surface of the implant (Mombelli et al. 1987). If plaque is present at the implants to be included, oral hygiene instructions are repeated and Baseline examination is rescheduled PICF (peri implant cravicular fluid): Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) will be collected from one site per implant, at the site with the most severe lesion at the baseline Suppuration: the presence or absence after light pressure against gingiva/mucosa or following gentle probing of the peri-implant pocket.

Mucosal bleeding: registered according to the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI) (Mombelli et al. 1987).

PPD: recorded with a pressure- sensitive probe (20 g) (University of North Carolina probe, Aesculap, Braun, Tuttlingen, Germany).

Bleeding index score: measured at the implants after probing at six sites, and graded (0-3):

0 = no bleeding,

  1. = spot bleeding,
  2. = line bleeding
  3. = profound bleeding within 30 seconds after measurement of PPD. Presence of keratinized mucosa: registered at the mid buccal site as "adequate" ≥2 mm, "inadequate" <2 mm (Moraschini et al. 2017).

Buccal recession; the distance from a fixed point - suprastructure/abutment connection to the mucosal margin in mm Saliva samples; Stimulated saliva will be collected for 5 min in sterile ice-chilled tubes while chewing on Parafilm.

Immediately after collection, volume of collected saliva will be recorded to determine salivary flow, while pH will be measured using a hand-held pH electrode or pH strips. Buffer capacity will be determined by adding 5 mM HCl in sample of the collect saliva in 3:1 ratio and then measuring the pH with a hand-held pH electrode or pH strips. Remaining saliva will be centrifuged at 7500 × g at 4°C for 10 min and stored in -80°C up to two months prior to further analysis. Total protein content in saliva will be measured using Pierce BCA protein assay, while calcium content will be determined with atomic absorption spectroscopy. Salivary antioxidant activity will be measured using ABTS assay. For these assays, the saliva samples will be thawed immediately prior to analysis and all samples will be discarded immediately after the assay is completed (edited 21.08.23) The following procedures will be performed by "the Operator" Radiographs of the implants showing clear projections of the implant threads at the mesial and distal surfaces will be taken using standard Eggens holders

All included implants receive the following treatment:

Repeated oral hygiene instruction if needed Submucosal instrumentation with ultrasonic device with a PEEK tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline Supramucosal polishing using polishing paste and rubber cup Following treatment, if local anesthesia was not applied, the subjects will be asked to grade the level of pain experienced on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS).

The Examiner leaves the room prior to randomization performed by the Operator by opening a concealed envelope stating "test" or "control". Each subject may have more than one implant included in the study. All the implants will be scheduled for the same frequency of SPiT

3-, 6- and 9 weeks following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At these time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator (non-blinded examination) and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered

12 weeks (3 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above VAS scales are registered

16 weeks (4 months) following baseline Appointments scheduled for High frequency SPiT implants only. At this time points, all implants are assessed by the Operator and receive supramucosal polishing, submucosal instrumentation as described above and OHI- if necessary VAS scales are registered

24 weeks (6 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered

36 weeks (9 months) following baseline At this time point, all implants are clinically examined by a blinded Examiner and receive supramucosal polishing as well as submucosal instrumentation and OHI as described above by the Operator VAS scales are registered Radiographs are taken according to the baseline examination Referring dentist/dental hygienist (if any) is given written information about the treatment performed and the result, and suggested routines of follow-up is suggested

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0455
        • Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carl Hjortsjø, Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be ≥ 20 years, diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis as defined by the World Workshop 2017 criteria (Berglundh et al., 2018) at an adequate (<0.5mm) bone level Peri-implant mucositis: Bleeding after gentle probing at an implant and no radiographic bone loss)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous radiotherapy in the affected area, current use of chemotherapy, systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment.

    • No pregnant or nursing subjects.
    • > class 2 according to the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification.
    • HIV positive or other disease severely affecting the immune system
    • If examiners/operators agree the placement of the implant (angle, position, proximity to adjacent implant or tooth) or suprastructure was suboptimal and considered to play a major role in the development of inflammation.
    • Anatomical abnormalities.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test. Increased treatment frequency
Submucosal instrumentation will be performed at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks.
The treatment under study is professional non-surgical, submucosal debridement with ultrasonic instruments with PolyEther Ether Ketone (PEEK) tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline
Active Comparator: Control. Conventional frequency
Submucosal instrumentation will be performed at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks
The treatment under study is professional non-surgical, submucosal debridement with ultrasonic instruments with PolyEther Ether Ketone (PEEK) tip followed by copious irrigation with sterile saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peri-implant inflammation
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 months
To assess the proportion of implants without signs of inflammation (Inflammation is defined as; Bleeding on Probing (BoP) and/or suppuration)
From baseline to 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of inflammation severity
Time Frame: From baseline to 9 months
Bleeding index (BI) 3, 2, 1, 0 (Roos-Jansåker et al., 2007)
From baseline to 9 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extent of inflammation
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
Number of inflamed sites at the implants (0-6)
Baseline to 9 months
Reduction of pocket probing depths
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
Pocket depths in mm
Baseline to 9 months
Buccal keratinized mucosa
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
Height of keratinized mucosa at the buccal aspect of the implant (in mm)
Baseline to 9 months
Progressive bone loss
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
Radiographic changes in bone level at the implant (in mm)
Baseline to 9 months
Implant survival
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
Presence of the implant at site, osseointegration intact (mobility grade =0)
Baseline to 9 months
Patient related outcome - pain
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
Patient experience of pain in relation to treatment, registered at a VAS-scale 0-100 mm
Baseline to 9 months
Accessibility
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
Patient and operators assessment of accessibility for maintenance/treatment, registered as sufficient/insufficient
Baseline to 9 months
Sulcus fluid analyses
Time Frame: Baseline to 9 months
The impact of saliva calcium content, buffer capacity and Ph on the different outcomes
Baseline to 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carl Hjortsjø, Ph.D, Institute for Clinical Dentistry, Dental Faculty, University of Oslo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 19, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 19, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SPiT-frequency I_Peri-implant
  • REK790097 (Other Identifier: Regional Ethic Committee, South East Norway)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD used in the results publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publicaton

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Central Contact person and corresponding author of publication

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis

Clinical Trials on Submocosal instrumentation using a ultrasonic device (PEEK). Submucosal cleaning

Subscribe