- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06772714
10-year Follow-up of the Ponto Wide-implant
Long Term Follow-up of the Ponto Wide Implant: 10 Years of Clinical Evaluation
The goal of this single center, prospective study is to investigate the survival of the Ponto Wide Implant at least 10 years after implantation.
Secondary objectives are:
- To determine the amount and causes of implant loss and implant and/or abutment removal.
- To establish the stability of the implant.
- To assess skin complications.
- To investigate daily usage and the number of hours of use of the sound processor.
- To determine the quality of life.
During a check-up of the implant at the outpatient clinic, the skin around the implant will be assessed, the stability of the implant will be measured, and the patient will be asked to complete two questionnaires.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Gelderland
-
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525 GA
- Radboudumc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Implantation with Ponto Wide implant (diameter 4.5 mm, length 4.0 mm)
- Ten or more years of post-operative follow-up.
- Valid informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- No specific exclusion criteria have been set for the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Patients with a Ponto Wide Implant for 10 years
The study population consists of patients who received a Ponto Wide implant (4.5 mm diameter, 4.0 mm length) at least 10 years ago.
Only patients who participated in one of the two previous completed studies (Long-term stability and survival rates of a novel Oticon Medical bone conduction device implant, Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing) will be included
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Implant survival
Time Frame: It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
The number of Ponto Wide implants that have survived 10 years after implantation.
|
It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Amount of implant loss
Time Frame: This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
The number of implant losses over the past 10 years based on the patient files.
|
This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
|
Reasons of implant loss
Time Frame: This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
The reason for each implant loss.
|
This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
|
Amount of abutment loss
Time Frame: This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
The number of abutment losses over the past 10 years based on the patient files.
|
This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
|
Reasons of abutment loss
Time Frame: This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
The reason for each abutment loss.
|
This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
|
Amount of implant removal
Time Frame: This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
The number of implant removal over the past 10 years based on the patient files.
|
This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
|
Reasons of implant removal
Time Frame: This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
The reason for each implant removal.
|
This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
|
Amount of abutment removal
Time Frame: This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
The number of abutment removals over the past 10 years based on the patient files.
|
This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
|
Reasons of abutment removal
Time Frame: This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
The reason for each abutment removal.
|
This will be examined during the period from November 2024 to March 2025
|
|
Implant stability Quotient (ISQ) measured using Osstell
Time Frame: It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
ISQ (implant Stability Quotient) is a measurement scale for use with the Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) method of determining implant stability.
The measurement is made using the Osstell Mentor equipment (Osstell, Sweden) with SmartPegs.
ISQ values range from 1 to 100, the higher the score the higher the stability.
The highest and lowest score obtained from perpendicular measurements will be registered.
|
It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
|
Skin complication
Time Frame: It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
Skin complication rates at >10-year follow-up are assessed using both the Holgers classification and the IPS-score.
Both classification systems are standardized scales to clinically assess the skin condition around the implant.
|
It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
|
Sound processor use
Time Frame: It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
Average sound processor usage (hours per day; days/week) >10 years post-surgery.
|
It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
|
Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI)
Time Frame: It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
The GBI questionnaire is used to evaluate the quality of life after a medical intervention.
The questionnaire consists of 18 items corresponding to different aspects of the patient's well-being: quality of life, self-confidence, support, general health, and social involvement.
The scoring ranges from 1 to 5, indicating that a higher score means the statement is more applicable to the patient after the intervention.
|
It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
|
International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)
Time Frame: It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
The IOI-HA questionnaire is a seven-item tool designed to be broadly applicable in evaluating the effectiveness of hearing aid treatments.
These questions provide insight into how satisfied patients are with their hearing aids.
Each statement offers five possible responses on an ascending scale, indicating whether the answer is more or less applicable to the statement.
|
It will be assessed during the clinic visit between November 2024 and March 2025.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Emmanuel Myalnus, Prof. dr., Radboud University Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kruyt IJ, Kok H, Bosman A, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Three-Year Clinical and Audiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Implants for Bone Conduction Devices: Comparison Between Tissue Preservation Technique and Tissue Reduction Technique. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Mar;40(3):335-343. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002105.
- den Besten CA, Bosman AJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Controlled Clinical Trial on Bone-anchored Hearing Implants and a Surgical Technique With Soft-tissue Preservation. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Jun;37(5):504-12. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000994.
- Nelissen RC, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):105-11. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3593-x. Epub 2015 Mar 20. Erratum In: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):113-4. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3798-z.
- Vijverberg MA, Caspers CJI, Kruyt IJ, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Prospective 5 year outcomes of different implant designs and surgical techniques in 68 patients with bone anchored hearing implants. Clin Otolaryngol. 2023 Jan;48(1):65-69. doi: 10.1111/coa.13974. Epub 2022 Sep 17. No abstract available.
- Kruyt IJ, Nelissen RC, Mylanus EAM, Hol MKS. Three-year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a 4.5-mm-Wide to a 3.75-mm-Wide Titanium Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing. Otol Neurotol. 2018 Jun;39(5):609-615. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001761.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-17533
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Survival of the Ponto Wide Implant
-
University Hospital of North NorwayActive, not recruitingSurvival of the Implants With Revision as Endpoint | Clinical Performance With HHS | Patients Satisfaction With the Hip ImplantNorway
-
LivaNovaCompletedAssess the Benefits From the AAISafeR/SafeR Algorithm of Symphony 2550 or REPLYTM DR in a Wide Range of Pacemaker Patients.Italy, France, Spain, United States, Germany, United Kingdom
-
Universidade Federal FluminenseEnrolling by invitationPeriimplantitis | Osseointegration | Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant | Dental Implant Stability | Prospective Study | Implant Survival Using Immediate Loading Protocol | Peri-Implant Health | Peri-Implant Tissues | Peri-implant Soft Tissue HealingBrazil
-
Abdelrhman Tarek Sahry AbdelazimCompletedImmediate Implant Placement Guided by the Roots of Multiradicular TeethEgypt
-
Suez Canal UniversityCompletedPartial Edentulism of the Maxilla | Dental Implant Loading | Tooth Loss in the Anterior MaxillaEgypt
-
Handan VuralActive, not recruitingEvaluation of the Survival of Different Fissure Sealants in Partially Erupted Immature Molar Teeth at Various Eruption StagesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
shaimaa hamdyNot yet recruitingJumping Gap | Primary Stability of the Implants | Immediate Dental Implant Placement
-
Hospital Clínico Universitario de ValladolidHospital Clinic of Barcelona; Hospital de Basurto; Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra and other collaboratorsRecruitingPeriprosthetic Fractures | Periprosthetic Fracture of the Upper or Lower Limb | Peri-implant Fracture of the Upper or Lower Limb | Peri-implant FractureSpain
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...Completed
-
Tomas LinkeviciusCompletedDental Implant | Tooth Extractions | Primary Stability of the Implants | Marginal Bone Loss Around ImplantsLithuania