Factors Associated With the Complexity of Dental Implant Surgery After Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study

Attending Physician, Division of Periodontics, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung

Alcohol consumption, tooth position, and periodontitis-related tooth extraction affect the complexity of subsequent implant surgery after alveolar ridge preservation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed the dentition of 165 alveolar ridge preservation sites in 116 patients. The bone width at three different vertical levels was measured on cone beam computed tomography images, and a comparison of bone regeneration requirements for subsequent dental implant surgery was performed for different socket types.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

165

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Of 165 sites, dental implant surgery was performed at 156 sites. A total of 72 damaged sockets and 93 intact sockets were included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • teeth extraction in the premolar and molar regions, who underwent flapless tooth extraction with alveolat ridge preservation (ARP) and filling with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), who underwent cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) followed by dental implant surgery after tooth extraction, and with adequate oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • untreated periodontitis, systemic disease, or the of medication that influences bone metabolism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Alveolar bone width
Time Frame: 4~6 months
4~6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KMUHIRB-E(I)-20210023

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on the Complexity of Implant Surgery

Subscribe