Peri-Implant and Peri-Prosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology, Morbidity, Mortality, Treatment and Outcome Analysis (PIPPAS)

January 16, 2022 updated by: Héctor J Aguado, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid

Peri-Implant and Peri-Prosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology, Morbility, Mortality, Treatment and Functional Outcome Analysis. A Prospective Multi Center Observational Collaborative Study

This study supports Spanish data collection and analysis on Periprosthetic and Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower limb. Treatment and clinical management of this fractures are complex and goes along with complications. There will be more than 70 hospitals providing information. This study will provide evidence on which is the best treatment for every unique patient. This will help trauma surgeons and geriatricians to provide better treatments, to improve health care in our society, reducing mortality, morbidity, improving functional outcomes, and reducing costs, which in turn will be advances in trauma care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is no clinical evidence on which are the best treatment options for Periprosthetic and Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower limb. This is a multi-center collaborative study seeking to obtain a big number of patients. Data collection includes previous health status and quality of life, which is the clinical management and treatment, as well as the outcome after one month, six months and one year. The investigators will be able to define risk factors and clinical attitudes, which influence on the patient outcome. And therefore, be able to establish treatment protocols and give management recommendations based on the observed clinical evidence to improve healing indexes, morbidity and mortality, function, grade of autonomy and quality of live.

Main questions to be answered are: 1. which is the epidemiology of Periprosthetic and Peri-implant fractures and how are they treated in Spain, 2. Identify risk factors for complications and worse outcomes, 3. which is the morbidity and mortality, 4. influence of the fracture type and implants already placed on management and outcome, 5. influence of the treatment on patients' grade of independency, and 6. identified which are the risk factors for treatment failure.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinic
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pilar Camacho, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Montsant Jornet
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebrón
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jordi Teixidor, MD
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08080
        • Recruiting
        • Mutua Universitaria de Tarrasa
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pablo Castillón, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Judith López Catena, PhD
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • ALTHAIA, Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Josep M Muñoz Vives, MD PhD
      • Gijón, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital de Jove
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pablo Garcia-Portabella, MD
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cristina Ojeda-Thies, MD PhD
      • Valladolid, Spain, 47007
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Héctor J Aguado, MD PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Adela Pereda

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients treated for a Periprosthetic or a Peri-implant fracture of the upper or lower limb by any participant hospital in Spain.

Hospital participation is voluntary and upon request or invitation. 80 hospitals participating all over Spain

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with the diagnose of Periprosthetic fracture of the shoulder, elbow, hip or knee. Or patients with the diagnose of Peri-implant fracture of the scapula, humerus, forearm, pelvis, femur, patella, tibia or fibula. Or patient presenting cut-out or cut-in after DHS or nail after a proximal humeral fracture.
  • 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spine PP or PI fracture
  • PP or PI secondary to metastasis or tumoral fracture
  • PP or PI intraoperative fracture
  • PP or PI pathologic fracture
  • PP ankle fracture
  • PP or PI wrist or hand fracture
  • Fixation failure without any new fracture line: except cut-out or cut-in after DHS or nail of a proximal humeral fracture.
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Ecologic or Community
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Rate of mortality at anytime from fracture diagnose up to 12 months
Up to 12 months
Fracture classification
Time Frame: Pre-operatively (Day -1)
Fracture classification using the UCS for periprosthetic fractures, and the adapted H. Broggi classification for peri-implant fractures. Number of patients in each classification group
Pre-operatively (Day -1)
Treatment
Time Frame: Post-operatively (Day +1)
Number of patients treated with fixation or revision and fixation or implant removal
Post-operatively (Day +1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fracture healing
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Rate of bone union on X-rays
Up to 12 months
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
EuroQuality of Life 5Dimensions 5Leves (EQ5D5L)
Up to 12 months
Dependency
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Clinical frailty scale (1-9) 1=very fit, 9=terminally ill
Up to 12 months
Mental situation
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Pfeiffer test
Up to 12 months
Gait
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
FFN-MCD mobility scale (Fragility Fracture Network-Minimum Common Dataset). 1-5: 1=independent mobility, 5=No functional mobility
Up to 12 months
Bone protector treatment
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Is the patient under treatment with vitamine D, calcium, bone formation, bone modeling?
Up to 12 months
Life style change
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Need to change place of living because of the fracture or its sequels.
Up to 12 months
Medical or Surgical complications
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
in need of at least one in-hospital night.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Héctor J Aguado, MD PhD, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid
  • Study Director: Pablo Castillón, MD PhD, Mútua Universitaria de Terrassa
  • Principal Investigator: Josep M Muñoz Vives, MD PhD, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa
  • Principal Investigator: Cristina Ojeda-Thies, MD PhD, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid
  • Principal Investigator: Pilar Camacho, MD PhD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Principal Investigator: Jordi Teixidor, MD, Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebrón
  • Principal Investigator: Pablo García-Portablella, MD, Hospital de Jove, Gijón

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From 1st of January 2022

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Application form to the PIPPAS study office. The applicant must be a study participant and should describe which is the substudy to be held, providing a detailed description and variables need for that reason.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periprosthetic Fractures

3
Subscribe