- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06824870
Exploratory Study Evaluating the Effects of Dermo-cosmetic RV5026B Applied for 2 Months in Adults With Erythrocouperosis
Exploratory Study Evaluating the Effects of RV5026B Dermo-cosmetic Treatment ET1732 Formula Applied for 2 Months in Adult Subjects With Erythrocouperosis Associated With Pityriasis Folliculorum.
This exploratory study aims to evaluate the effects of the test product RV5026B - ET1732 on erythema, as well as on the sensations of discomfort and relief perceived in subjects with erythrocouperose and associated pityriasis folliculorum.
We wish to evaluate:
- firstly the test product alone in order to quantify the effects on the signs & symptoms on the entire face,
- then the contribution of the test product in addition to a reference topical treatment.
The test product RV5026B - ET1732 was developed to:
- Reduce redness, even if it has already set in, and help limit its reappearance
- Soothe the sensations of heating and discomfort associated
Study Overview
Status
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Schaerbeek, Belgium, 1030
- Dr FORTON
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Main inclusion criteria:
- Man or woman aged 18 to 75 years old
- Subject presenting erythrocouperosis associated with pityriasis folliculorum of the face with erythema of mild to severe intensity according to the IGA clinical rating on both cheeks
- High density of Demodex on both cheeks: SSSB1 > 5 D/cm² or SSSB2 > 10 D/cm²
Main non-inclusion criteria:
- Subject presenting, on the day of inclusion, a dermatological condition of the face other than that studied
ORAL/GENERAL TREATMENTS that were planned to be taken during the study OR that were taken:
A. In the last 3 months:
- Any change in hormone replacement therapy.
- Any oral treatment Vit A or derivatives
B. In the last 4 weeks:
- Any change in oral drug treatment that could modify the skin characteristics of the subjects and interfere with the performance of the study product
- Tetracyclines
- Immunosuppressant
- Antiparasitic
- Corticosteroid or NSAID taken for more than 5 consecutive days
C. In the last 2 weeks:
- Antibiotic with known cutaneous impact
LOCAL TREATMENTS that were planned to be taken during the study OR that were taken:
A. In the last 3 months:
- Vascular laser of the face
B. In the last 4 weeks:
- Any topical medicinal product on the face that could modify the skin characteristics of the subjects and interfere with the performance of the study product.
C. In the last 10 days:
- Changes to any topical cosmetic product (toiletries, care products and makeup) on the face
D. In the last 7 days:
- Topical antiseptic on the face
- Any topical cosmetic product applied to the face that could modify the skin characteristics of the subjects and interfere with the performance of the product under study
E. Since the last wash performed the night before:
- Application of topical treatment, rinsed or non-rinsed dermocosmetic product on the face
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treated group (first hemiface)
Treated group = hemi-face with the reference topical product and the tested product RV5026B - ET1732 during period 2
|
Period 1 (1 month): The tested product RV5026B - ET1732 will be applied twice a-day on full-face The product sould be applied in sufficient quantity to cover the application area.
Period 2 (1 month) : the reference topical product, prescribed by the investigator will applied each evening on the whole face.
Period 2 (1 month) : The tested product RV5026B - ET1732 will be applied twice a-day on randomised half-face.
The evening application will be done 15 minutes after the application of the reference treatment.
Hands must be washed between the application of the 2 products.
|
|
Other: Control group (second hemiface)
Control group = hemi-face with the reference topical product alone during period 2
|
Period 1 (1 month): The tested product RV5026B - ET1732 will be applied twice a-day on full-face The product sould be applied in sufficient quantity to cover the application area.
Period 2 (1 month) : the reference topical product, prescribed by the investigator will applied each evening on the whole face.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Erythema score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
Assessed by the investigator according to the Investigator Global Assessment - IGA - scale (score from 0 to 3: None toSevere) on each side of the face
|
Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Overall dynamic efficiency score
Time Frame: Day 29 & Day 57
|
Assessed by the investigator according to Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - (-3 to +3) (Very significant worsening = -3to Very significant improvement = +3) compared with baseline status at visit 1 on each side of the face
|
Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Demodex density
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
assessed by Standardized Skin Surface Biopsy (SSSB1 & SSSB2 and SSSB1+2) on each hemiface by on-site optical microscope count, then protein analysis on SSSBs sample
|
Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Rating of the intensity of the erythema
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
(score from 0 to 100) by centralized a posteriori analysis of the photographs taken on each side of the face, carried out by an expert dermatologist using software presenting the images taken for each of the subjects, blindly
|
Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Flush score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
Score over the last 3 days preceding the assessment according to the Global Flushing Severity Score - GFSS - numerical scale (score from 0 to 10 - None to Extreme: ) on each side of the face
|
Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Dynamic SGA (subject global assessment) scale
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
Scale with 7 points (-3 to +3) (Very significant worsening = -3 to Very significant improvement = +3) in comparison with the initial state of visit 1 on each side
|
Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Subject acceptability questionnaire
Time Frame: Day 29 & Day 57
|
assessed by the subject with subject's questionnaire
|
Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Tolerance of the products for 2 months of use by adverse events
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
Recording of Adverse events
|
Day 1, Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Tolerance of the tested product for 2 months of use by global tolerance per subject
Time Frame: Day 29 & Day 57
|
assessed by the investigator for both groups and per subject, considering all individual AE and their characteristics, based on a 5-point scale (0=Bad tolerance, 4= Excellent tolerance)
|
Day 29 & Day 57
|
|
Subject's compliance regarding the test product
Time Frame: During the entire course of the study (approximately 57 days)
|
The subject will report his compliance in a subject's diary.
|
During the entire course of the study (approximately 57 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RV5026B20220514
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Erythrocouperose Associated With Pityriasis Folliculorum of the Face
-
CerbaXpertNot yet recruitingWoman Suffering From a Pathology Frequently Associated With the Presence of These Anti-autoantibodies Type-I Interferons
-
Hospices Civils de LyonRecruitingClinical Dementia Rating (CDR) From the Analysis of Medical Record | Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Face-to-face Interview With the PatientFrance
-
Guangxi Medical UniversityCompletedFull Gene Sequences of c-KIT、PDGFRA and DOG1 Are Analyzed With the Screening-sequencing Approach | Investigate the Characteristics and Variations Associated With the Different Gene Mutations of c-KIT、PDGFRA and DOG1 in GIST Patients
-
Techfields Pharma Co. LtdCompletedA Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of X0002 Spray in Subjects With Osteoarthritis Knee PainPain Associated With Osteoarthritis of the KneeUnited States
-
Baskent University Ankara HospitalUnknownTo Investigate the Incidence and Causes of Awareness During General Anesthesia | To Investigate the of Dreaming During Anesthesia | To Investigate the Intra-operative Experiences of Patients Who Report Awareness | To Investigate the Risk Factors That May be Associated With Awareness | To... and other conditionsTurkey
-
Diskapi Teaching and Research HospitalUnknownThe Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia and Rate of Compliance With Survey Criteria
-
Kırıkkale UniversityEnrolling by invitationSuspected Damage to Fetus From Other Disease in the Mother, Affecting Management of Mother, With Delivery | Patient Death or Serious Disability Associated With A Haemolytic Reaction Due to the Administration of ABO-Incompatible Blood or Blood ProductsTurkey
-
Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.WithdrawnAcute Pain (Flare) Associated With Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknownTo Compare the Serum Apoptosis-associated Markers Between Patients With Active TB and Patients With LTBI | To Evaluate the Efficiency of Apoptosis-associated Markers to Differentiate Potential of Active TB From LTBITaiwan
-
InvestigatorUrologyIBSALInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de SalamancaUnknownEstablish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of the Aggressiveness of the Tumors According to the Gleason Classification | Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes in Terms of Morbidity Associated With the Technique | Establish the Efficacy Between the Four Schemes... and other conditionsSpain
Clinical Trials on RV5026B - ET1732 - Period 1
-
JW PharmaceuticalCompletedHealthyKorea, Republic of
-
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.Not yet recruiting
-
Genexine, Inc.SymyooCompletedTotal Thyroidectomy | Near-total ThyroidectomyKorea, Republic of
-
Genentech, Inc.Completed
-
Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.CompletedUlcerative Colitis (UC)China
-
LG Life SciencesCompletedHypertension, HyperlipidemiaKorea, Republic of
-
PfizerCompletedHealthy VolunteersUnited States
-
LG Life SciencesCompletedHypertension | HyperlipidemiaKorea, Republic of
-
Acasti Pharma Inc.Active, not recruitingAtaxia TelangiectasiaCanada
-
Synthetic Biologics Inc.CompletedHealthy VolunteersCanada, United States