Clinical Dementia Rating Medical Record (CLIMER)

April 29, 2022 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Reliability of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale From the Medical Record in Comparison With the Reference Method.

The assessment of severity of the cognitive and functional impairment is essential in the follow-up of patients with neurocognitive disorders and in the assessment of the effectiveness of therapeutics. However, the systematic assessment of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is limited due to the time required to complete it (approximately 45 min to 1 hour). Insofar as studies have shown correspondences between the CDR and scales measuring cognitive and neuropsychological performance, and as part of memory consultations, several functional and neuropsychological scales are systematically administered, we wish to conduct a study validating the feasibility of the CDR based on information already available in the patient's file compared to the evaluation of the CDR by the usual method (face-to-face interview in consultation).

This study should highlight the feasibility of scoring the CDR-SB from the files of patients in memory consultation, first in terms of reliability of the scores obtained compared to the standard evaluation, and on the other hand in terms of organization and duration of administration.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

144

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will be conducted on the basis of the patient consulting in Memory Consultation, specifically with the information already collected in normal care and the MEMORA cohort.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has CDR assessment in face-to-face interview during the memory consultation,
  • Patient with an isolated cognitive complaint or a neurocognitive disorder
  • Patient included in the MEMORA cohort

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient or caregiver who does not wish their data to be used for research purposes within the framework of the MEMORA cohort.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Memory consultation patient
The study will be conducted on the basis of the patient consulting in Memory Consultation, specifically with the information already collected in normal care and the MEMORA cohort.
The assessment of the CDR is administered once by a psychologist with the patient and his caregiver.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CDR Sum of boxes (CDR-SB) score out of 18
Time Frame: The CDR-SB score is collected at the baseline.

The CDR-SB score is obtained in normal condition and on file for the same patients. The CDR-SB score makes it possible to distinguish the following classes: 0 (normal), 0.5-4 (questionable cognitive impairment), 0.5-2.5 (questionable impairment), 3-4 (very mild major TNC or very mild dementia), 4.5- 9 (mild or mild dementia), 9.5-15.5 (moderate dementia), 16-18 (severe dementia).

The patient's aptitudes are assessed in 6 different areas: 3 cognitive skills: memory, orientation and judgment, 3 acts of everyday living: participation in collective life, home occupations and hobbies, personal care.

The CDR-SB score is collected at the baseline.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anthony Bathsavanis, Psy D, Hopital des Charpennes
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Krolak-Salmon, MD, Hôpital Edouard Herriot

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CDR assessment face-to-face

Subscribe