Comparison of Abdominal Draw-in Maneuver With Real-time Ultrasound Imaging Biofeedback vs Conservative Physical Therapy in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

March 4, 2025 updated by: Serdar Kilinc, Abant Izzet Baysal University

Comparison of Abdominal Draw-in Maneuver With Real-time Ultrasound Imaging Biofeedback vs Conservative Physical Therapy in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of abdominal drawing-in maneuver with real-time ultrasound biofeedback to conservative treatment in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Low back pain is a common clinical condition among musculoskeletal disorders. It can be classified into two main categories: acute and chronic. Acute low back pain is usually limited to a duration of 6 weeks or less, whereas chronic low back pain refers to pain lasting 12 weeks or longer. Chronic low back pain is characterized by persistent and untreated pain, which can significantly affect individuals' physical and psychological health. A multidisciplinary approach is required for its treatment. Physical therapy, pharmacological approaches, psychotherapy, and exercise are the main treatment methods.

Exercise plays an active role in both the prevention and treatment of the disease. Among many exercise methods, the abdominal drawing-in maneuver has been proven effective in the literature. Biofeedback is a technique that helps individuals consciously control their physiological processes. Real-time ultrasound biofeedback stands out as a technique that directly visualizes musculoskeletal system functions. This method uses high-frequency sound waves to assess the dynamic movements of internal organs and muscle structures. Through this technology, individuals can visualize their movements in real time and consciously adjust their muscle activity or posture. It offers significant advantages, particularly in clinical and sports applications such as pelvic floor rehabilitation, postural balance training, and motor control skill development.

The aim of our study is to compare the effectiveness of exercises performed with real-time ultrasound biofeedback with those in patients receiving conservative treatment. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: Group 1: Patients receiving conservative treatment and performing the abdominal drawing-in maneuver with real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback. Group 2 (Control Group): Patients receiving conservative treatment and performing the abdominal drawing-in maneuver with only verbal instruction. A total of 40 patients are planned to be included in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The duration of low back pain is at least 3 months.
  • Low back pain with or without radiation to the lower extremities.
  • Age between 18-65 years.
  • Chronic nonspecific low back pain patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neuropathic pain complaints.
  • Pregnancy status.
  • History of infection, cancer, or trauma.
  • Neurological abnormalities.
  • History of lumbar spine surgery.
  • History of conservative physical therapy and/or injections in the lumbar region within the last 6 months.
  • Neurological diseases such as Parkinson's or Multiple Sclerosis.
  • Systemic diseases that prevent exercise.
  • Patients with a Mini-Mental Test score below 24.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Real-Time Ultrasound Biofeedback with Abdominal Draw-In Manuever
The patient, who has been instructed on the abdominal drawing-in exercise, assumes a supine position with knees bent. The ultrasound screen is positioned so that both the practitioner and the patient can see it. The researcher places the linear ultrasound probe on the patient's transversus abdominis muscle to obtain an image, which is then shown to the patient for awareness. The patient is instructed to keep their eyes on the screen and follow their muscle activity throughout the exercise. During the exercise, the patient's muscle is displayed on the screen, and they are asked to hold the contraction at its maximum level for 10 seconds. After the contraction phase, the patient is instructed to relax and rest for 2 minutes. The treatment is completed with a total of 10 repetitions.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS):It is an electrotherapy modality commonly used in pain management. Conventional TENS will be applied to our patients. The frequency of Conventional TENS will be 50 Hz, the pulse duration will be 80 µs, the amplitude will be of mild to moderate intensity as perceived by the patient, and the duration will be 20 minutes.

Hot Pack:It is a superficial heat therapy method commonly used to reduce muscle spasms, increase circulation, and alleviate pain.The packs, which are kept in hydrocollator tanks, will be applied at a temperature that will not harm the patient.The application time is 20 minutes.

Therapeutic Ultrasound:This method, which uses sound waves to support tissue healing, creates heating and healing effects in deep tissues and is commonly used to reduce pain and relieve muscle spasmsThe frequency of the applied ultrasound will be 1 MHz, with an intensity of 1.5 W/cm², and it will be applied for 8 minutes in continuous mode

Active Comparator: Conservative treatment group without biofeedback
Starting Position: The patient lies in a supine position with knees bent and feet flat on the ground. The neck and spine are kept in a neutral position. Breath Control: The patient focuses on abdominal expansion while inhaling and flattening the abdomen while exhaling. Transversus Abdominis Activation: The patient attempts to draw the abdominal muscles inward (pulling the navel toward the spine). During this movement, care should be taken to avoid pressing the lower back against the ground or contracting the hip muscles. The goal is to activate only the deep abdominal muscles. Checking for Proper Muscle Activation: The patient can place their fingertips on the lower abdominal region (just above the pelvic bone) to feel whether the transversus abdominis muscle is activating correctly. Maintaining the Position: The patient holds this activation for 5-10 seconds while continuing to breathe naturally, then relaxes. Muscles should be fully relaxed between repetitions.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS):It is an electrotherapy modality commonly used in pain management. Conventional TENS will be applied to our patients. The frequency of Conventional TENS will be 50 Hz, the pulse duration will be 80 µs, the amplitude will be of mild to moderate intensity as perceived by the patient, and the duration will be 20 minutes.

Hot Pack:It is a superficial heat therapy method commonly used to reduce muscle spasms, increase circulation, and alleviate pain.The packs, which are kept in hydrocollator tanks, will be applied at a temperature that will not harm the patient.The application time is 20 minutes.

Therapeutic Ultrasound:This method, which uses sound waves to support tissue healing, creates heating and healing effects in deep tissues and is commonly used to reduce pain and relieve muscle spasmsThe frequency of the applied ultrasound will be 1 MHz, with an intensity of 1.5 W/cm², and it will be applied for 8 minutes in continuous mode

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: before treatment
Pain was evaluated using a 10 cm long Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during rest and activity (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain).
before treatment
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: In the 3rd week of treatment
Pain was evaluated using a 10 cm long Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during rest and activity (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain).
In the 3rd week of treatment
Muscle Thickness
Time Frame: before treatment
The linear probe is placed transversely at the point where the iliac crest intersects with the middle point of the T12 rib, crossing the mid-axillary line. The position of the linear probe is adjusted until all abdominal muscles are visible. To standardize the images, the center point of the probe in the image is shifted 2 cm laterally to align with the insertion of the superficial fascia of the transversus abdominis muscle. The thickness of the transversus abdominis muscle is determined by the distance between the superficial and deep fascia at the thickest point in the image. The thickness between the two fasciae is measured using the digital caliper of the device.
before treatment
Muscle Thickness
Time Frame: In the 3rd week of treatment
The linear probe is placed transversely at the point where the iliac crest intersects with the middle point of the T12 rib, crossing the mid-axillary line. The position of the linear probe is adjusted until all abdominal muscles are visible. To standardize the images, the center point of the probe in the image is shifted 2 cm laterally to align with the insertion of the superficial fascia of the transversus abdominis muscle. The thickness of the transversus abdominis muscle is determined by the distance between the superficial and deep fascia at the thickest point in the image. The thickness between the two fasciae is measured using the digital caliper of the device.
In the 3rd week of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: before treatment
The Berg Balance Scale is an assessment tool developed to measure balance performance in geriatric patients. It is frequently used in clinical studies to evaluate postural control and predict fall risk. The scale consists of 14 instructions, and the patient's performance for each instruction is observed and scored from 0 to 4. A score of 0 is given when the patient is unable to perform the activity at all, while a score of 4 is given when the patient completes the activity independently.
before treatment
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: In the 3rd week of treatment
The Berg Balance Scale is an assessment tool developed to measure balance performance in geriatric patients. It is frequently used in clinical studies to evaluate postural control and predict fall risk. The scale consists of 14 instructions, and the patient's performance for each instruction is observed and scored from 0 to 4. A score of 0 is given when the patient is unable to perform the activity at all, while a score of 4 is given when the patient completes the activity independently.
In the 3rd week of treatment
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: before treatment
The Oswestry Disability Index is a specific questionnaire method used to assess functional status in patients with low back pain. It consists of 10 items, each evaluating the impact of low back pain on daily living activities. Each item is rated from 0 to 5, and the total score is converted into a percentage for evaluation. A total score of 0-20%: Minimal disability, 21-40%: Moderate disability, 41-60%: Severe disability, 61-80%: Crippled condition, and 81-100%: Complete disability.
before treatment
Oswestry Disability Index
Time Frame: In the 3rd week of treatment
The Oswestry Disability Index is a specific questionnaire method used to assess functional status in patients with low back pain. It consists of 10 items, each evaluating the impact of low back pain on daily living activities. Each item is rated from 0 to 5, and the total score is converted into a percentage for evaluation. A total score of 0-20%: Minimal disability, 21-40%: Moderate disability, 41-60%: Severe disability, 61-80%: Crippled condition, and 81-100%: Complete disability.
In the 3rd week of treatment
Lomber Range of Motion
Time Frame: before treatment
The range of motion of lomber region will be measured passively with a goniometer in the flexion, abduction, internal rotation and external rotation directions.
before treatment
Lomber Range of Motion
Time Frame: In the 3rd week of treatment
The range of motion of lomber region will be measured passively with a goniometer in the flexion, abduction, internal rotation and external rotation directions.
In the 3rd week of treatment
EQ-5D-3L General Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: before treatment
The EQ-5D-3L is a standardized, simple, and short questionnaire method used to measure individuals' overall health status. It contains five questions: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. For each question, a 3-level assessment is made (1: No problems, 2: Moderate problems, 3: Severe problems).
before treatment
EQ-5D-3L General Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: In the 3rd week of treatment
The EQ-5D-3L is a standardized, simple, and short questionnaire method used to measure individuals' overall health status. It contains five questions: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. For each question, a 3-level assessment is made (1: No problems, 2: Moderate problems, 3: Severe problems).
In the 3rd week of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Real-Time Ultrasound Biofeedback with Abdominal Draw-In Manuever

Subscribe