The Effects of Tele-Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

August 2, 2025 updated by: Pınar Kuyulu

The Effect of Tele-Rehabilitation on Pain, Kinesiophobia and Disability in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of telerehabilitation on pain, disability, kinesiophobia and normal range of motion in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. The study included 100 patients aged 18-64 years with chronic non-specific low back pain. In our study, McKenzie extension exercises were applied to 50 patients online via the zoom platform and to 50 patients face-to-face in the clinical environment under the supervision of a physiotherapist in charge. In our study, pain was assessed with the VAS, disability was assessed with the ODI, kinesiophobia was assessed with the TKS, and ROM was assessed with a goniometer. As a result of our study, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS values between both groups, a statistically significant difference was observed in both groups according to the measurement times and the pain level decreased in both groups. As a result of our study, there was no statistically significant difference in ODI values between both groups, a statistically significant difference was observed in both groups according to the measurement times and the level of disability decreased in both groups. As a result of our study, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in TKS values and no difference was observed according to the measurement times in both groups. As a result of our study, there was no statistically significant difference in ROM values between both groups, a statistically significant difference was observed in both groups according to the measurement times and ROM values increased. In conclusion, telerehabilitation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain is as effective as face-to-face exercise training in improving pain, disability and range of motion levels, but the effect of telerehabilitation on improving kinesiophobia has not been found.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of telerehabilitation on pain, disability, kinesiophobia and normal range of motion in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. The study included 100 patients aged 18-64 years with chronic non-specific low back pain. In our study, McKenzie extension exercises were applied to 50 patients online via the zoom platform and to 50 patients face-to-face in the clinical environment under the supervision of a physiotherapist in charge. In our study, pain was assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), disability was assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), kinesiophobia was assessed with the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS), and Range of Motion (ROM) was assessed with a goniometer. As a result of our study, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS values between both groups (p>0.05), a statistically significant difference was observed in both groups according to the measurement times and the pain level decreased in both groups (p<0.05). As a result of our study, there was no statistically significant difference in ODI values between both groups (p>0,05), a statistically significant difference was observed in both groups according to the measurement times and the level of disability decreased in both groups (p<0,05). As a result of our study, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in TKS values (p>0,05) and no difference was observed according to the measurement times in both groups (p>0,05). As a result of our study, there was no statistically significant difference in ROM values between both groups (p>0.05), a statistically significant difference was observed in both groups according to the measurement times and ROM values increased (p<0.05). In conclusion, telerehabilitation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain is as effective as face-to-face exercise training in improving pain, disability and range of motion levels, but the effect of telerehabilitation on improving kinesiophobia has not been found.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gaziantep, Turkey, 27090
        • Sanko University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being between 18-64 years of age,
  • Having non-specific low back pain for ≥3 months,
  • Not having radicular symptoms related to low back pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of surgery on the spine and/or extremities,
  • Diagnosis of malignancy,
  • Orthopaedic and neurological disorders affecting the evaluation and treatment, - Psychiatric illness,
  • Physical therapy for low back pain in the last six months,
  • Being pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tele-rehabilitation group
Tele-rehabilitation exercise was applied to this group.
For this group, McKenzie extension exercises were applied to 50 patients online via the zoom platform.
Active Comparator: Face-to-face group
This group underwent conventional face-to-face exercise.
For this group, 50 patients face-to-face in the clinical environment under the supervision of a physiotherapist in charge.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability
Time Frame: 18 months
In our study, disability has assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
18 months
Pain intensity
Time Frame: 18 months
In our study, pain has assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 to 10
18 months
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: 18 months
In our study, kinesiophobia has assessed with the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TKS). Scores range from 17 to 68 points.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of motion
Time Frame: 18 months
In our study, Range of Motion (ROM) has assessed with a goniometer.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Arzu Demirguc, PhD, Professor, Sanko University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The publication of the scientific article in a journal might be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Spesific Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Tele-rehabilitation exercise

Subscribe