Pulse Corticosteroids Or/and Immunoglobulins to Treat Fulminant Myocarditis (CORIUM)

March 19, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Pulse Corticosteroids Or/and Immunoglobulins to Treat Fulminant Myocarditis: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Adaptive Trial the CORIUM Study

Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is the most severe manifestation of acute myocarditis, an acute inflammatory myocardial disease most often triggered by viral infections.

Currently, the most accepted definition of FM requires acute illness, hemodynamic compromise due to cardiogenic shock, and need for hemodynamic support (inotropes and/or temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) in the absence of an ischemic cause or other pre-existing cardiomyopathies. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of evidence-based management strategies for this disease and the management of patients affected by FM often varies according to local experience and practice with the role of immunosuppression being the most debated issue.

Besides, due to inconsistent results obtained in several studies and frequent spontaneous recovery with supportive therapy alone, immunosuppression is largely debated in the setting of lymphocytic myocarditis (LM). Among available medications for this disease, corticosteroids are often used despite a lack of clear evidence in the context of FM. Similarly, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has both antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects on myocarditis. In adults, a recent meta-analysis based on case series showed that IVIG therapy significantly reduced in-hospital mortality, improved the left ventricular ejection fraction, and significantly increased the survival rate in patients with FM. More recently, FM among patients with COVID-19, including post-infectious multisystem inflammatory syndrome, has been reported in young adult patients. These severe forms have been successfully treated with intravenous corticosteroids and IVIG, highlighting the relevance of the systemic inflammatory response in determining cardiac injury in COVID-19, even though more evidence is needed.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Fulminant myocarditis defined by

    • the acute illness (<1 month from symptom onset),
    • hemodynamic compromise due to cardiogenic shock (confirmed by echocardiography) or electrical storm,
    • elevated plasma cardiac troponin > twice normal value
    • need for hemodynamic support (inotropes or temporary mechanical circulatory support) for less than 72 hours in the absence of an ischemic cause or other pre-existing cardiomyopathies Noticeably, a coronary angiogram should be performed in patients ≥40 years of age when myocarditis has not been proven histologically. Besides, an endomyocardial biopsy will not be mandatory to fulfill the definition of fulminant myocarditis.

      2. Signed informed consent from the patient, a close relative or surrogate or a family member or a legal representative for minor patient.

    • Adult : According to the specifications of emergency inclusion, randomization without the close relative/surrogate consent could be performed if the patientis unable to give his/her consent and when the close relative/surrogate/family member are absent. Close relative/surrogate/family member consent will be asked as soon as possible after randomization. The patient will be asked as soon as possible to give his/her consent for the continuation of the trial when his/her condition will allow.
    • Minor : According to the specifications of emergency inclusion, randomization could be performed when legal representative are absent. Legal representative consent will be asked as soon as possible after randomization 3. Social security registration (AME excluded)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Age <15 2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding or baby delivery <6 months 3. Initiation of inotropes or temporary mechanical circulatory support >72 hours 4. Resuscitation >20 minutes (cumulative low-flow time > 20 minutes ) 5. Pre-existing ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy or Tako-Tsubo evaluated by echocardiography.

    6. Known systemic autoimmune disorder or other conditions requiring immunosuppression 7. Patients with peripheral eosinophilia (≥1000 G/L) 8. Myocarditis associated with anti-cancer immune checkpoint inhibitor agents 9. Active severe bacterial or fungal infectious disease 10. Patient moribund on the day of randomization, SAPS II >90 11. Contraindication or allergies to corticosteroids or immunoglobulins or any components of the formulations or their excipients 12. Patients already on corticosteroids or receiving IVIG 13. Participation in another interventional study or being in the exclusion period at the end of a previous study.

    14. Patients with an uncontrolled psychotic condition Patients with known anti-IgA antibodies in line with the contraindications of methylprednisolone IV and of IVIg based products respectively

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pulse bolus corticosteroids group
  1. 1 gram/day of methylprednisolone IV for three days followed by 1mg/kg/day IV until inotropes weaning or 7 days whatever come first.
  2. Placebo of IVIG: glucose 5% 0.5g/kg/day for 4 days
Treatment administration
Experimental: Pulse bolus corticosteroids and IVIG group
  1. 1 gram/day of methylprednisolone IV for three days followed by 1mg/kg/day IV until inotropes weaning or 7 days whatever come first.
  2. 0.5g/kg/day IVIG for 4 days.
Treatment administration
Placebo Comparator: Double placebo pulse bolus corticosteroids (G5%) and IVIG (G5 %)
Treatment administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A composite hierarchical outcome composed of four components : 1) mortality at D28 2) heart transplant/VAD/persisting t-MCS at D28, and 3) number of days alive without t-MCS and inotropes at D28
Time Frame: Day 28
Each patient will be compared with every other patient in the study and assigned a score (tie: 0, win: +1, loss: -1) for each pairwise comparison based on whom fared better. If one patient survived without heart transplantation or long-term assist ventricular device or t-MCS still ongoing at day 28 and the other does not, scores of +1 and -1 will be assigned, respectively. Otherwise, the assigned score will depend on which patient had more days free from t-MCS and inotropes: the patient with more days off t-MCS and inotropes will receive a score of +1, and the other patient -1. If both patients survived and had the same number of days off t-MCS and inotropes, or if both patients died or had a heart transplant or a VAD, they will be both assigned a score of 0 for that pairwise comparison. For each patient, scores for all pairwise comparisons will be summed, resulting in a cumulative score which will be the primary endpoint of the study.
Day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Day 28, Day 60, Day 90
Day 28, Day 60, Day 90
Number of temporary mechanical circulatory support free days
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Number of inotropes-free days
Time Frame: Day 28
Day 28
Incidence of ventricular assisted device use
Time Frame: Day 28, Day 60, Day 90
Day 28, Day 60, Day 90
Incidence of heart transplant
Time Frame: Day 28, Day 60, Day 90
Day 28, Day 60, Day 90
Left ventricular function (%) assessed by echocardiography (Simpson method)
Time Frame: Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28
Day 3, Day 7, Day 14, Day 28
Time to normalize troponin
Time Frame: From randomization to Day 14
From randomization to Day 14
Time to normalize N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide
Time Frame: From randomization to Day 14
From randomization to Day 14
Incidence of drugs side effects
Time Frame: From randomization to Day 28
nosocomial infections, significant gastrointestinal bleeding, renal insufficiency, acute delirium leading to the use of neuroleptic agents
From randomization to Day 28
Proportion of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 55%
Time Frame: Day 28, 6 months
Day 28, 6 months
Proportion of patients with left ventricular dilatation
Time Frame: Day 28, 6 months
Day 28, 6 months
Proportion of patients with late gadolinium enhancement evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Incidence of hyperglycemia
Time Frame: From randomization to Day 14
From randomization to Day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alain COMBES, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients.

Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocarditis Acute

Clinical Trials on Pulse bolus corticosteroids

Subscribe