Comparison of Antegrade and Retrograde Fixation With Intramedullary Screws in Metacarpal Fractures

April 3, 2025 updated by: UMUT ERASLAN, Pamukkale University

Comparison of Antegrade and Retrograde Fixation With Intramedullary Headless Canulated Screws in Patients With Metacarpal Fractures

Purpose: Intramedullary fixation has proven to be an efficacious intervention for metacarpal fractures. Advantages involve stable fixation facilitating early surgical rehabilitation and higher fracture union rates, without increased morbidity. We aimed to compare the results of fixation of metacarpal fractures with headless cannulated screws towards antegrade or retrograde on pain, function and quality of life in patients with metacarpal fractures.

Methods: Patients admitted to Pamukkale University Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, due to metacarpal fracture were prospectively included in the study and randomly grouped. A total of 22 patients and 26 metacarpal fractures were assessed. Group I patients were operated with antegrade(proximal entry) , and group II with retrograde (distal entry) , using intramedullary headless cannulated screws. Appropriate screw selection was made by measuring the metacarpal isthmus diameter of the patient's x-ray results (AP and oblique direction). We used headless cannulated screws with diameters between 3.5mm and 5mm in the fractures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a prospective randomised comparative single-blinded study comparing the effects of intramedullary fixation direction and entry site in patients with metacarpal fractures.

The participants were first evaluated at post-operative 6th week and the last evaluation was performed at post-operative 12th week The evaluations included radiographic union, grip strength measurement (with Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer), range of motion measurement (compared to the opposite hand), and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ) questionnaire. All assessments were performed by the same investigator. The researcher who performed the evaluations did not know which group the participants were in.

In the antegrade headless cannulated screw fixation technique, a small incision was made on the extensor aspect of the fractured metacarpal at the level of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint and the extensor tendon was excised. After fracture reduction, k-wire was inserted intramedullarly. After appropriate drilling, 1 headless cannulated screw was applied distally.(figure 1) In the fixation technique with retrograde headless cannulated screw, a small incision was made on the extensor side of the fractured metacarpal at the level of the MCP joint, and the extensor tendon split was passed. After fracture reduction, k-wire was inserted intramedullarly. After appropriate drilling, headless cannulated screw was applied proximally.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Denizli, Turkey
        • Pamukkale University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Operated for metacarpal fracture,
  • Speak and understand Turkish,
  • Understand the verbal and written information given.
  • Regular follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open epiphysis
  • Pathological fractures
  • Fractures requiring bone grafting

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1
antegrade (proximal entry) fixation
In the antegrade headless cannulated screw fixation technique, a small incision was made on the extensor aspect of the fractured metacarpal at the level of the carpometacarpal joint.
Active Comparator: Group 2
retrograde (distal entry) fixation
In the fixation technique with retrograde headless cannulated screw, a small incision was made on the extensor side of the fractured metacarpal at the level of the metacarpophalangeal joint.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic Examination (anteroposterior and oblique diameter)
Time Frame: postop 6th week
Primary bone healing was accepted as union when callus tissue developed in at least 3 cortices on AP and oblique radiographs taken with a radiography device or on the 6th week control radiograph. Radiological measurements were performed by a single observer.
postop 6th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of motion
Time Frame: postop 6th and 12th week
Range of motion was measured with a universal goniometer. All measurements were made with the patient in the sitting position.
postop 6th and 12th week
Grip strength
Time Frame: postop 12th week
Grip strength was assessed as gross grip and pinch grip with a Jamar hand dynamometer and a pinchmeter according to the recommendation by the American Society of Hand Therapists.
postop 12th week
Hand functionality (Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire)
Time Frame: postop 12th week
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire consists of a total of 63 items for both hands and each item is scored between 1-5. It evaluates the hand and wrist in 6 domains: overall hand function, activities of daily living, pain, work performance, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction.
postop 12th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Umut Eraslan, PhD, Faculty of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 111990

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metacarpal Fracture

Clinical Trials on antegrade (proximal entry) fixation

Subscribe