Effect of Modified Mesh on Surgical Success in Transobturator Tape Surgery (MOTOT)

July 8, 2025 updated by: Izzet Celegen
This study is a single-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating whether changing the width of the surgical tape (mesh) used in transobturator tape (TOT) surgery improves treatment results in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Two mesh widths are being compared: a 1.2 cm mesh (new method) and a 1.0 cm mesh (standard method). The main goal is to find out if the wider mesh leads to better urinary control and fewer complications. Participants will be followed for one year to measure cure rates, symptom improvement, and satisfaction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of mesh width on surgical outcomes in transobturator tape (TOT) procedures for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). A total of 106 participants will be randomized using a computer-generated allocation into two groups receiving either a 1.2 cm mesh (intervention group) or a 1.0 cm mesh (standard procedure).

The procedures will be conducted by a single experienced surgeon using a monofilament polypropylene mesh to ensure standardization. Surgical technique, anesthesia protocols, and perioperative management will be identical in both groups.

Primary outcome is objective cure, defined as negative stress test at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include symptom improvement (ICIQ-SF), mesh-related complications (erosion, infection, retention), and patient satisfaction assessed via structured Likert survey.

Follow-up visits are scheduled at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year. Postoperative assessments will be conducted by a blinded evaluator. The study aims to evaluate whether wider mesh width provides superior anatomical support and reduces complication rates in comparison to standard mesh.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

106

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Van, Turkey, 65090
        • Recruiting
        • Van Regional Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yusuf Başkıran, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients aged 18 years or older
  • Clinical diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), confirmed by:
  • Positive stress test (urine leakage on coughing with a comfortably full bladder)
  • Q-tip test showing urethral hypermobility (>30 degrees)
  • Inadequate response to conservative therapy (e.g., pelvic floor muscle training, behavioral therapy)
  • Eligible for transobturator tape (TOT) surgery
  • Body mass index (BMI) less than 35 kg/m²
  • Able to provide informed consent and follow postoperative instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior midurethral sling surgery
  • Mixed urinary incontinence or urge-dominant symptoms
  • Pelvic organ prolapse stage > II according to the POP-Q system
  • Neurological disorders affecting bladder function (e.g., multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury)
  • Active urinary tract infection or recurrent UTI (defined as ≥3 infections within the past 12 months)
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant within the next 12 months
  • Severe comorbid conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, active malignancy, pelvic radiotherapy)
  • Use of medications that significantly affect bladder function (e.g., anticholinergics, diuretics)
  • Inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits or comply with postoperative care plan

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1.2 cm Mesh (Intervention Group)
Participants in this group will undergo transobturator tape (TOT) surgery using a 1.2 cm monofilament polypropylene mesh.
Patients in this group will undergo transobturator tape (TOT) surgery using a 1.2 cm monofilament polypropylene mesh. The modified mesh width is being evaluated for its effect on surgical success, symptom improvement, and postoperative complications.
Active Comparator: 1.0 cm Mesh (Control Group)
Participants in this group will undergo transobturator tape (TOT) surgery using a 1.0 cm monofilament polypropylene mesh, which represents the standard procedure.
Patients in this group will undergo transobturator tape (TOT) surgery using a 1.0 cm monofilament polypropylene mesh, which is the standard procedure. This group serves as a comparator to assess the impact of the modified mesh width.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Cure Rate Based on Negative Stress Test
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Objective cure will be defined as the absence of urinary leakage during a standardized cough stress test with a comfortably full bladder. The test will be performed by a blinded assessor at 6 months postoperatively.
6 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Mesh-Related Complications
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Incidence of mesh-related complications including mesh erosion, bladder outlet obstruction, infection, and pain. Complications will be assessed by physical examination and patient-reported symptoms during follow-up visits.
6 months postoperatively
Recurrence of Stress Urinary Incontinence
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively

Proportion of patients who present with recurrence of stress urinary incontinence, defined as a positive cough stress test or self-reported symptoms of urine leakage during physical activity.

Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively

6 months postoperatively
Change in ICIQ-SF Score
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Change in total score on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF), measured before surgery and at 6 months postoperatively. The ICIQ-SF ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse symptom severity and greater impact on quality of life.
6 months postoperatively
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
Patient satisfaction will be measured using a structured questionnaire that includes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Assessment will be conducted at the 6-month follow-up visit.
6 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 12, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to confidentiality policies and institutional regulations. Summary-level results may be shared upon request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on 1.2 cm Mesh TOT

Subscribe