Effects Of Neurocognitive Therapy With And Without Soft Robotic Hand On Hand Function

August 18, 2025 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Neurocognitive Therapy With and Without Soft Robotic Hand on Hand Function in Sub-acute Stroke

To determine the effect of neurocognitive therapy with and without a soft robotic hand on manual ability, dexterity, strength, spasticity and upper limb function in sub-acute stroke.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke is a global disease with high death rate and high disability caused by motor cortical damage. According to the calculations, there were approximately 13.68 million new increased stroke patients all over the world a year and about 70% of survivors had different degrees of upper limb and hand movement dysfunction .The recovery rate of patients' motor function mainly depends on rehabilitation training. Therefore, due to individual difference of patients. Neurocognitive therapy is an effective therapy to improve and increase cognitive, sensory and motor function of upper limb. Robotic hand also help the function of weak hand muscle. Neurocognitive therapy with a robotic hand will have the potential to offer targeted, precise, and adaptable interventions, possibly increase the rehabilitation process compared to both interventions alone. Evaluating their relative efficacy will aid in refining and tailoring rehabilitation strategies for individuals recovering from acute stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Recruiting
        • Sheikh Zayad Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shazia Abdul Mateen, MS NMPT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants of Post stroke patients (6-12 weeks )
  • Participants with Spasticity < 2 on modified Ashworth scale.
  • Participants with first ever stroke.
  • Participants with normal cognition > 24 on MoCA
  • Participants must be able to provide informed consent
  • Hemiparesis with arm motor deficit as assessed by with NIHSS >1(14)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who have a history of significant neurological or orthopedic disorders, other than stroke, that could interfere with upper limb motor or sensory recovery.
  • Participants who have altered state of consciousness, severe aphasia, severe cognitive deficit.
  • Participants who have severe pathologies of traumatic and or rheumatic nature, severe pain in effected arm (>5 on visual analog scale for pain) .
  • Participants who have active pacemakers and other active implants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neurocognitive Therapy with Soft Robotic Hand based
Neurocognitive therapy group with soft robotic hand for 30 minutes along routine physical therapy for 15 minutes , the participants will be blindfolded during the exercises and ask to concentrate on sensing the position of the limb and hand Opening and closing of the soft robotic glove is controlled by the hand control switch .Treatment session of 45 minutes will be given 3 times a week for 12 week.
There will be 23 participants received Neurocognitive Therapy without soft robotic hand . Total 45 minutes session will be provided to patient including 15 minutes of routine physical therapy training for upper limb. The following hand exercises will be performed . Passive localization, passive identification, and active object exploration .For localization placed a part of the patient's limb, typically the fingertip, on one external object (e.g. sand paper, toothpick, sponge, paint brush, cotton ball, pencil, eraser ) and for identification water bottle, sponge, toothpaste tube, electrical plug, plastic ball, paper cup, tape roll, metal bolt with nut, tape roll . During active exploration the The training object will be repositioned, and another object of a different shape or size will be offered (water bottle, water bottle with ice in it, sponge. The blindfolded patient then used his effected hand to explore different objects and asked to identify each object .
Experimental: Neurocognitive Therapy without Soft Robotic Hand based
Neurocognitive therapy group without soft robotic hand for 30 minutes along routine physical therapy for 15 minutes , the participants will be blindfolded during the exercises and ask to concentrate on sensing the position of the limb and hand Opening and closing of the soft robotic glove is controlled by the hand control switch .Treatment session of 45 minutes will be given 3 times a week for 12 week.
There will be 23 participants received Neurocognitive Therapy with soft robotic hand . Total 45 minutes session will be provided to patient including 15 minutes of routine physical therapy training for upper limb. The following hand exercises will be performed . Passive localization, passive identification, and active object exploration .For localization placed a part of the patient's limb, typically the fingertip, on one external object (e.g. sand paper, toothpick, sponge, paint brush, cotton ball, pencil, eraser ) and for identification water bottle, sponge, toothpaste tube, electrical plug, plastic ball, paper cup, tape roll, metal bolt with nut, tape roll . During active exploration the The training object repositioned, and another object of a different shape or size offered (water bottle, water bottle with ice in it, sponge. The blindfolded patient then used his effected hand to explore different objects and asked to identify each object with soft robotic hand.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): (cognition)
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a one-page, 30-point cognitive screening measurement scale that takes about 10 minutes to administer. There are 12 subtasks in the MoCA test that include memory, visuospatial orientation, executive functioning, phonemic fluency, and two-item abstract thinking task, attention, concentration, and working memory, language, orientation to time and place. A score of 26 is a cutoff score to differentiate between normal and abnormal. Inter-rater Reliability (0.96) Cronbach's alpha .Change will be measured from baseline to 12 weeks.
12 Weeks
Barthel Index (basic activities of daily living)
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The BI is a measure of functional status whose validity when used on a general population of older people has been shown . The BI uses 10 items . Of the 10 items, two (bathing and grooming) are rated on a two-point scale of 0 and 1, six (feeding, dressing, bowels, bladder, toilet use and stairs) on a three-point scale of 0, 1 and 2 and the last two items (transfers and mobility) are rated on a four-point scale of 0, 1, 2 and 3. Change will be measured from baseline to 12 weeks.
12 Weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)( spasticity level of the upper limb)
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The original Ashworth scale was a 5 point numerical scale that graded spasticity from 0 to 4, with 0 being no resistance and 4 being a limb rigid in flexion or extension. In 1987, while performing a study to exam interrater reliability of manual tests of elbow flexor muscle spasticity, Bohannon and Smith modified the Ashworth scale by adding 1+ to the scale to increase sensitivity. Change will be measured from baseline to 12 weeks.
12 Weeks
Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment (ErNSA) (sensation and proprioceptive)
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The ErNSA is a specialized assessment tool designed to evaluate tactile sensation and proprioceptive ability in the upper limb. It consists of various subtests that provide a detailed examination of sensory function, contributing valuable insights into the sensory recovery post stroke of the upper limb).Change will be measured from bassline to 12 weeks.
12 Weeks
) Action Research Arm Test (grasping, grip- ping, pinching)
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
The ARAT is a hierarchical scale for the evaluation of arm-hand capacity. It consists of 19 functional items that are divided into 4 subtests: grasp, pinch, grip, and gross motor function. A total score of 57 indicates normative performance. The reliability and validity of the ARAT for patients with stroke have been established. on ARAT scores and subsequently classified into 5 different categories: 0 to 10 points as no capacity, 11 to 21 points as poor capacity, 22 to 42 points as limited capacity, 43 to 54 points as notable capacity, and 55 to 57 points as full capacity. Change will be measured from baseline to 12 weeks.
12 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aruba Saeed, Phd*, Riphah International University
  • Study Chair: Shazia Abdul Mateen, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Neurocognitive Therapy without Soft Robotic Hand

Subscribe