Pilot Study of Throat Packs Soaked in Gengigel Spray in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery

April 19, 2025 updated by: SABREENA BINTI ISMAIL, University of Malaya

The Pilot Study of Throat Packs Soaked in Gengigel Spray in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Under General Anaesthesia

Throat packs are commonly used in many surgical procedures involving the oral cavity and pharynx, primarily to prevent blood, saliva, and other debris from entering the lower respiratory tract, thereby maintaining a clear airway and reducing the risk of aspiration and respiratory complications. Traditionally, these packs are moistened with saline or used in a dry state, with the choice often depending on the surgeon's preference and specific surgical requirements. However, despite their widespread usage, the exploration of alternative substances to moisten throat packs, particularly those with additional therapeutic benefits, remains limited in medical research. This pilot study introduces Gengigel spray as an innovative alternative to saline for moistening throat packs. Gengigel, a hyaluronic acid (HA)-based product, is known for its healing properties and anti-inflammatory effects, which are beneficial in oral care. Gengigel provides a non-anesthetic approach that promotes tissue repair and reduces inflammation. This makes it particularly advantageous in the context of surgical procedures where reducing postoperative inflammation and promoting mucosal healing are crucial.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Using throat packs is a standard practice in surgeries involving the oral cavity, pharynx, and upper airway to prevent the aspiration of blood and other debris, which could lead to postoperative complications such as aspiration pneumonia. Traditionally, these throat packs are moistened with saline or left dry. However, this conventional approach has been associated with postoperative throat pain and discomfort, which are common and often distressing complications for patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. The discomfort caused by these packs can delay recovery, extend hospital stays, and negatively impact overall patient satisfaction with the surgical experience.

Gengigel presents a novel alternative with distinct advantages. Gengigel, which contains hyaluronic acid (HA), is recognized for its anti-inflammatory and healing properties, making it a promising candidate for improving postoperative outcomes when used in throat packs. Despite Gengigel's established use in other medical applications, such as wound care and oral health, there is currently no research exploring its effectiveness in moistening throat packs during surgical procedures. This represents a significant knowledge gap, as the combination of Gengigel's healing and anti-inflammatory effects could potentially address both pain and mucosal recovery.

Addressing this gap is crucial for advancing postoperative care, as current literature does not adequately explore the potential benefits or risks associated with using Gengigel in throat packs. Furthermore, there is a lack of data on patient outcomes, including the extent of pain relief, the speed of mucosal healing, potential complications, and overall patient satisfaction when Gengigel is utilized in this context. The absence of such data limits the ability of healthcare providers to make evidence-based decisions that could improve patient care.

To bridge this gap, this study proposes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the outcomes of using Gengigel-soaked throat packs versus traditional saline-soaked packs in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. The study will systematically assess postoperative throat pain levels, evaluate the degree of mucosal healing, monitor for any adverse effects, and measure overall patient satisfaction. By conducting this comprehensive evaluation, the research aims to provide robust evidence that could guide the use of Gengigel in throat packs, potentially setting a new standard in postoperative care. Ultimately, the findings could lead to enhanced patient comfort, faster recovery times, and a higher quality of care for patients undergoing surgeries involving the oral cavity and pharynx.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 50603
        • Recruiting
        • Sabreena Ismail
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sabreena Ismail, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Classified as ASA I-II, indicating a relatively low risk of complications from anesthesia
  2. Aged between 18 and 60 years, which represents a typical adult surgical population
  3. Both male and female patients, ensuring gender inclusivity and representation in the study findings

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Existing sore throat prior to surgery, which could affect the baseline measurement of postoperative sore throat.
  2. Anticipation of a difficult airway, as these patients may require specialized intubation techniques that are not standardized across the study.
  3. More than two attempts at endotracheal tube (ETT) insertion, as multiple attempts could cause additional trauma and skew the study outcomes.
  4. Any trauma occurring during intubation, which could independently contribute to postoperative sore throat and other complications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Saline soaked throat pack
Throat pack used will be soaked with saline
Throat pack will be soaked with gengigel, and post operatively, will see if there is any presence of sore throat, severity of sore throat. 10 mlm of gengigel, in liquid form will be used to soak the throat pack. 30 patients will receive gengigel spray soaked throat pack, and control group will receive normal saline soaked throat pack
Experimental: Gengigel soaked throat pack
Throat pack used will be soaked with gengigel
Throat pack will be soaked with gengigel, and post operatively, will see if there is any presence of sore throat, severity of sore throat. 10 mlm of gengigel, in liquid form will be used to soak the throat pack. 30 patients will receive gengigel spray soaked throat pack, and control group will receive normal saline soaked throat pack

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of postoperative sore throat.
Time Frame: 6 months
This will be assessed with Scoring System of Harding and McVey
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of postoperative sore throat
Time Frame: 6 months
This will be assessed with Scoring System of Harding and McVey
6 months
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
This will be assessed with a yes/no question regarding their overall satisfaction with the postoperative care.
6 months
The presence of hoarseness of voice
Time Frame: 6 months
This will be assessed with Scoring System of Harding and McVey
6 months
The presence of cough
Time Frame: 6 months
This will be assessed with Scoring System of Harding and McVey
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 12, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe