UPBEAT: Using Polygenic Scores to Guide BB Therapy in HF With Mildly Reduced EF (UPBEAT)

May 4, 2026 updated by: David Lanfear

Using Polygenic Scores to Guide Beta-blocker Therapy for Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

This study will use polygenic scores, a tool which describes differences in genetics, to examine effectiveness of beta blocker medication in heart failure patients with ejection fraction of 41-50 percent. The study will also assess beta blockers' effect on the changes in left ventricular end-systolic volume index by MRI.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem that displays wide variation in progression and response to therapy. Beta-blockers (BB) are the cornerstone of treatment for HF reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but only ~25% of patients experience a marked and sustained ejection fraction (EF) response, and they can have unwanted side effects (fatigue, depression, erectile dysfunction, others). The potential for Precision Medicine to improve HF care is great, but despite proof of concept, actionable ways are still lacking to use genomic or biomarker strategies to predict response to typical treatment. An important limitation of pharmacogenetics to date is that most studies used candidate gene approaches, assuming other loci are not meaningful. Unbiased approaches (e.g. genome-wide [GW] association) overcome this, but the typical analysis requires stringent significance levels which result in missing potentially important sources of variation. Common complex disease and drug responses are unlikely to be under strong single-loci influence (e.g., Mendelian disease), and instead are likely influenced by many loci that have relatively weak effects (i.e., polygenicity); such phenotypes are better tackled with approaches like polygenic risk scores. The PI has developed and validated a polygenic score for BB drug-response (in terms of mortality benefit) in HF for European ancestry patients and is currently developing a new score for diverse ancestries, particular African ancestry and admixed populations. To move this new paradigm for precision medicine forward to clinical utility, a randomized trial of BB by genomic (polygenic score) subgroups is needed. Moreover, pivotal trials of BB in HF excluded patients with mildly reduced EF (HFmEF, 40-50%), representing a public health issue of significant size (an estimated prevalence of 1.6M Americans) where currently BB may or may not be used and with limited data to guide who should or should not receive this key therapy. HFmEF patients have abnormal systolic function, high event rates, share many characteristics with HFrEF, and the polygenic response score correctly differentiates responders from non-responders in this group, making them the ideal group of patients in which to test genomically targeted BB treatment in a clinical trial. This pilot study will demonstrate feasibility of a future phase 2 study. That study, if successful would potentially revolutionize HF care by demonstrating signs of efficacy in terms of polygenic drug targeting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Recruiting
        • Henry Ford Health
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-89 years
  • Ejection Fraction (EF) >40% and =<50% by any modality within 1 year (must be most recent)
  • Clinical diagnosis of HF within 1 year, evidenced by any one: Hospital discharge with primary or secondary HF diagnosis, ER discharge with primary diagnosis of HF, ambulatory diagnostic code for HF and diuretic use, BNP>35 ng/L or NTproBNP >125 ng/L at any time
  • Expected ability to fully participate in study (can tolerate study processes, no long travel)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Previous documented EF =< 35%
  • Currently on BB =>25% target dose
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP > 180 at enrollment)
  • Has contraindications to all BB or intolerance to metoprolol
  • Systolic BP < 100 or heart rate <70
  • Current cancer requiring active treatment
  • Heart transplant or LVAD or expected in the next year
  • Life expectancy < 1 year for any reason
  • Dialysis dependence or ESRD
  • MI/ PCI or other cardiac surgery within 90 days prior to enrollment or planned in the future
  • Absolute indication for BB other than heart failure (e.g. tachyarrhythmia required BB for rate control, angina)
  • If PI decides for any reason participation in trial is not in best interest of the patient
  • Has a contraindication to completing MRI procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Beta Blocker
This group will be dispensed and titrated on beta blocker according to study protocol.
Participants randomized to intervention will be dosed and titrated on beta blocker according to study protocol.
No Intervention: Placebo
This group will be dispensed and titrated on placebo according to study protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in left ventricle end systolic volume index
Time Frame: Within 6 months of randomization
LVESVi, measured in mL per square meter; assessed by cardiac MRI
Within 6 months of randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Other MRI ventricular performance characteristics: Left ventricular EF
Time Frame: Baseline and within 6 months of randomization
Left ventricular EF, measured in percentage
Baseline and within 6 months of randomization
Other MRI ventricular performance characteristics: Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index
Time Frame: Baseline and within 6 months of randomization
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) as assessed by cardiac MRI, measured in mL per square meter
Baseline and within 6 months of randomization
Clinical effects: blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline through exit visit, an interval of approximately 6 months
Change in Blood pressure, measured in mmHg
Baseline through exit visit, an interval of approximately 6 months
Clinical effects: Heart rate
Time Frame: Baseline through exit visit, an interval of approximately 6 months
Change in Heart rate, measured in beats per minute
Baseline through exit visit, an interval of approximately 6 months
Change in NT-proBNP levels
Time Frame: Baseline and within 6 months of randomization
Blood test for biomarker level of N-terminal pro Brain natriuretic protein, measured in ng/L
Baseline and within 6 months of randomization
Quality of life status
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly for duration of approximately 6 months
Summary score of KCCQ
Baseline and monthly for duration of approximately 6 months
Functional status
Time Frame: Baseline through exit visit, an interval of approximately 6 months
Change in 6-minute-walk-test, measured in meters
Baseline through exit visit, an interval of approximately 6 months
Clinical safety events
Time Frame: Baseline through 30 days following completion of exit visit
Measured in all-cause mortality
Baseline through 30 days following completion of exit visit
Clinical safety events
Time Frame: Baseline through 30 days following completion of exit visit
Measured in heart failure hospitalizations and emergency room visits
Baseline through 30 days following completion of exit visit
Clinical safety events
Time Frame: Baseline through 30 days following completion of exit visit
Measured in symptomatic hypotension or syncope
Baseline through 30 days following completion of exit visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Lanfear, MD, Henry Ford Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Beta blocker

3
Subscribe