Comparing Arndt and Tappa Endobronchial Blocker During Pediatric One Lung Ventilation

June 9, 2022 updated by: Meltem Savran Karadeniz, Istanbul University

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Application of Arndt and Tappa Endobronchial Blocker During Pediatric One Lung Ventilation

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and ease of placement of two different endobronchial blockers(Arndt and Tappa blocker) for pediatric patients undergoing thoracotomy. Time from laryngoscopy to successful insertion of the blocker by an experienced anaesthetist will be recorded and the difficulty of placement of the blocker will be assesed. We plan to evaluate the lung collapse and also observe the effect of two different bronchial blockers on patients' ventilation and oxygenation and adverse events such as desaturation, failed one lung ventilation.Our primary outcome is the time from laryngoscopy to successful insertion of the bronchial blocker by an experienced anaesthetist. Our secondary outcomes are effects of two different bronchial blockers on lung isolation score, ease of placement of the bronchial blocker, mechanical ventilation parameters (tidal volume, respiratory rate, peak airway pressure, plateau pressure, compliance), intraoperative blood gas analysis (paO2, pCO2, saO2, lac), frequency of malposition after successful blocker placement, surgical exposure and complications.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Many techniques for one lung ventilation exist including the use of double-lumen tubes, endotracheal tubes and bronchial blockers. The choice of lung isolation technique depends on the age, the size of the patient, experience of the anaesthetist and type of the surgery. The use of double lumen tube for one lung ventilation is very common. However, it may be challenging and hazardous in some cases such as pediatric patients, patients with tracheostomy, difficult airway scenarios. Endobronchial blockers can be used for these cases. Bronchial blockers have high-volume,low-pressure balloons so they are less likely to cause damage to the airway mucosa while achieving a successful lung isolation. Arndt blocker has a low-pressure, high-volume balloon, a multiport airway adapter and a guide loop. On the other hand, Tappa bronchial blocker has an auto inflation balloon, and a high volume low pressure cuff. It also has 'Tappa angle' which is designed as per human anatomy which makes it easier to insert.

In our study, we aim to compare the efficacy and ease of placement of Arndt and Tappa blocker for pediatric one lung ventilation. Our primary outcome is the time from laryngoscopy to successful insertion of the bronchial blocker by an experienced anaesthetist. Secondary outcomes are effects of two different bronchial blockers on lung isolation score, ease of placement of the bronchial blocker, mechanical ventilation parameters (tidal volume, respiratory rate, peak airway pressure, plateau pressure, compliance), intraoperative blood gas analysis (paO2, pCO2, saO2, lac), frequency of malposition after successful blocker placement, surgical exposure and complications. The difficulty of placement of the blocker will be assesed by a 5-point scale (1:very easy, 5:impossible) and the lung collapse will be evaluated by using a 10-point scale (10: complete collapse).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 14 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients undergoing thoracic surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiology Class 1-2-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Denial of patients or parents
  • Coagulopathy
  • With preexisting cardiac dysfunction
  • Wtih history of renal and/or hepatic dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tappa Blocker Group
After orotracheal intubation, Tappa endobronchial blocker will be inserted using a broncoscope by an experienced anaesthetist. Time from laryngoscopy to successful placement of the endobronchial blocker will be recorded.
After intubation, the Tappa bronchial blocker will be advanced either through the intubation tube or outside the tube using a fiberoptic broncoscope. Once the position of the blocker is confirmed, the cuff of the blocker will be inflated with 1-3 mL of air. Since Tappa blocker has an autoinflation system, the anaesthetist can both inflate the cuff with one hand and operate the fiberoptic broncoscope at the same time.
Active Comparator: Arndt Blocker Group
After orotracheal intubation, Arndt endobronchial blocker will be inserted using a broncoscope by the experienced anaesthetist. Time from laryngoscopy to successful placement of the endobronchial blocker will be recorded.
After intubation, the endobronchial blocker will be passed through a multiport airway adapter that is placed at the proximal end of the tracheal tube.The fiberoptic broncoscope will be passed through the port and then through the guidewire loop at the end of the blocker. The bronchial blocker and the broncoscope will be advanced as a single unit into the target part of a right or left lung. The broncoscope will be withdrawn into the trachea and the blocker cuff will be inflated and the position of the blocker will be confirmed using the fiberoptic broncoscope. The wire loop will be removed after correct placement of the blocker. Once the guide wire is removed, the blocker can't be replaced.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from laryngoscopy to placement of the bronchial blocker
Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes
Time from laryngoscopy to correct insertion of the bronchial blocker by an experienced anaesthetist will be recorded.
Up to 30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lung collapse score
Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes
Lung collapse will be assesed at 5,10,15,and 20 minutes after pleural opening using a 10-point scale by the surgeon. 1 point refers to the inflated lung and 10 point refers to a completely collapsed lung.
Up to 30 minutes
Difficulty of placement
Time Frame: Up to 30 minutes
The anaesthetist will rate the difficulty of placement of the bronchial blocker using a 5-point scale, 1 point being very easy and 5 points being impossible to insert.
Up to 30 minutes
Tidal volume
Time Frame: Up to 120 minutes
Volume of gas delivered during each ventilator breath.
Up to 120 minutes
Respiratory rate
Time Frame: Up to 120 minutes
Number of breaths delivered by the ventilator per minute.
Up to 120 minutes
Peak airway pressure
Time Frame: Up to 120 minutes
Pressure used to deliver tidal volume by overcoming resistance in airways and lungs .
Up to 120 minutes
Plateau pressure
Time Frame: Up to 120 minutes
End inspiratory pressure during a period with no gas flow in the circuit.
Up to 120 minutes
Compliance
Time Frame: Up to 120 minutes
Change in volume of the lung produced by a change in pressure across the lung.
Up to 120 minutes
Partial pressure of oxygen
Time Frame: At 15 minutes after initiation of one lung ventilation.
Measurement of oxygen pressure in arterial blood.
At 15 minutes after initiation of one lung ventilation.
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide
Time Frame: At 15 minutes after initiation of one lung ventilation.
Measurement of carbon dioxide pressure in arterial blood.
At 15 minutes after initiation of one lung ventilation.
Lactate
Time Frame: At 15 minutes after initiation of one lung ventilation.
Lactate levels in arterial blood gas is used to evaluate tissue perfusion.
At 15 minutes after initiation of one lung ventilation.
Frequency of malposition of the bronchial blocker
Time Frame: Up to the end of one lung ventilation intraoperatively.
Frequency of malposition of the bronchial blocker after successful bronchial blocker placement will be recorded if the blocker displaces.
Up to the end of one lung ventilation intraoperatively.
Length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
If the patients stay in ICU postoperatively
Up to 48 hours
First mobilitisition time
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
First mobilitisition time
Up to 24 hours
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 1 week
Length of hospital stay
Up to 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meltem Savran Karadeniz, Assoc Prof, Istanbul University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 25, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Diseases

Clinical Trials on Tappa Endobronchial Blocker

Subscribe