Educational Intervention on Skin Cancer Protective Behaviors Among Female Healthcare Workers

August 17, 2025 updated by: Arash Salahshouri, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

Impact of a Health Belief Model-Based Educational Intervention on Skin Cancer Protective Behaviors Among Female Healthcare Workers

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess whether an educational intervention based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) can effectively improve skin cancer protective behaviors, knowledge, and related health beliefs among female healthcare workers in Ahvaz, Iran. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the HBM-based educational program increase participants' knowledge about skin cancer, its risk factors, and preventive measures?
  • Does the intervention improve key HBM constructs such as perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, self-efficacy, and cues to action, leading to enhanced protective behaviors against skin cancer?

Researchers will compare an intervention group receiving a multicomponent educational program-including seven 45-minute sessions delivered both in-person and via WhatsApp-tailored to HBM constructs, with a comparison group receiving no intervention, to determine the intervention's effectiveness.

Participants will:

  • Attend structured educational sessions covering skin cancer symptoms, risks, prevention strategies, behavioral barriers, motivation, and self-efficacy enhancement, using multimedia tools and group discussions
  • Receive reminder messages and educational materials to facilitate behavior change
  • Complete validated questionnaires assessing knowledge, HBM constructs, and protective behaviors before the intervention and two months afterwards

This study will evaluate if implementing a theory-driven, blended educational intervention can successfully promote protective behaviors and health beliefs related to skin cancer prevention among female healthcare workers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This clinical trial study was conducted from 2022 to 2023 in health centers of Ahvaz, Iran, to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) in promoting skin cancer protective behaviors among female healthcare workers (HCWs). The study employed a two-group parallel design, randomly allocating 160 participants into an intervention group (n=54) and a comparison group (n=106). Eligible participants included female HCWs employed in the selected centers, with smartphone access and the ability to engage with digital educational content.

The educational program was developed according to HBM constructs, including perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. The intervention consisted of seven 45-minute sessions delivered over two months using a blended approach combining in-person workshops and WhatsApp-based virtual education. Teaching methods included lectures, multimedia presentations, group discussions, motivational messaging, and reminder posters strategically placed in the workplace.

The content was tailored based on baseline knowledge and behavioral assessments. Early sessions addressed skin cancer symptoms, risk factors, and complications to raise awareness and perceived risk. Subsequent sessions emphasized the advantages of protective behaviors, addressed and sought to reduce perceived barriers, and incorporated stress management and motivational techniques to enhance self-efficacy.

Data collection employed a validated researcher-designed questionnaire covering demographic variables, knowledge about skin cancer, HBM constructs, and adherence to UV protective behaviors. Assessments were performed at baseline and two months post-intervention.

Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests for categorical variables, and independent and paired t-tests to compare continuous variables within and between groups. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlled for confounding factors when evaluating intervention effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Employment at Ahvaz healthcare centers,
  • Absence of specific dermatological conditions,
  • Provision of informed consent,
  • Having a smartphone and knowing how to use it, and
  • Non-participation in concurrent similar educational interventions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence from more than two training sessions,
  • Physical limitations preventing further participation,
  • Incomplete or invalid questionnaire .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1: Intervention Group
Female healthcare workers participated in a multilevel educational intervention based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) to enhance skin cancer protective behaviors. The program consisted of seven 45-minute sessions delivered both face-to-face and virtually via WhatsApp. The sessions focused on improving knowledge and modifying HBM construct. Educational materials included pamphlets, video clips, group discussions, and motivational messages. Reminders and posters were used in the workplace to reinforce learning and encourage sustained behavior change.

This blended educational intervention employs the Health Belief Model (HBM) to promote skin cancer preventive behaviors in female healthcare workers in Ahvaz, Iran. The 7-session program (each 45 minutes) combines in-person training with WhatsApp-based follow-ups.

Participant Components:

  • Structured sessions targeting knowledge and HBM constructs such as perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, and cues to action.
  • Use of multimedia tools including videos, pamphlets, and interactive discussions.
  • Motivational messaging, stress management clips, and role-modeling techniques to build self-efficacy.
  • Visual cues such as posters placed in healthcare workplaces.
  • Daily reminder messages to reinforce behavior change.

Unique aspects distinguishing this intervention include its specific tailoring for female healthcare workers in a high UV-exposure region, the combined digital and face-to-face delivery approach, and comprehensive focus on all HBM construc

No Intervention: Arm 2: Control Group
Participants in the control group did not receive any educational intervention during the study period. They continued with their usual work routine and standard health education programs available at their workplaces. Assessments of their knowledge, health beliefs, and protective behaviors related to skin cancer were conducted at baseline and two months later to serve as a comparison for evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Skin Cancer Protective Behaviors
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and 2 months post-intervention.
Skin cancer protective behaviors among female healthcare workers were assessed using a validated, researcher-developed questionnaire. The instrument included multiple items evaluating behaviors such as applying sunscreen, wearing protective clothing (wide-brimmed hats, long-sleeved shirts, gloves), and using sunglasses. Responses were measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"). Protective behaviors were expressed as the average score across items, with higher scores indicating more frequent and consistent engagement in skin cancer prevention practices.
Baseline (pre-intervention) and 2 months post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Cognitive-Behavioral Constructs Related to Skin Cancer Prevention
Time Frame: Before and two months after the intervention
This outcome assesses changes in Health Belief Model (HBM)-based constructs related to skin cancer prevention, including perceived susceptibility (5 items; score range: 5-25), perceived severity (6 items; score range: 6-30), perceived benefits (5 items; score range: 5-25), perceived barriers (6 items; score range: 6-30), cues to action (4 items; score range: 4-20), self-efficacy (7 items; score range: 7-35), and knowledge (15 items; score range: 0-15). All constructs except perceived barriers were scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Strongly Agree" (score 5) to "Strongly Disagree" (score 1), where higher scores indicate more favorable outcomes such as greater perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, self-efficacy, and cues to action. Items related to perceived barriers were reverse scored, so that higher scores indicate fewer perceived barriers. These constructs were measured using validated, researcher-developed questionnaires at baseline and two months after the inte
Before and two months after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arash Salahshouri, Ph.D., Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IR.AJUMS.REC.1401.129

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Public release of these data is not part of the research plan. However, upon reasonable request from researchers, and with ethics committee approval and strict confidentiality maintained, participant data can be shared with researchers in a controlled and limited manner.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Promoting Skin Cancer Protective Behaviors

Clinical Trials on Health Belief Model-Based Educational Program for Skin Cancer Prevention Among Female Healthcare Workers

Subscribe