Comparative Study of LoKomat® Exoskeleton VS C-Mill® Treadmill for Gait Recovery in Rehabilitation.

April 28, 2026 updated by: Jorge Velazquez, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca

Comparative Study of Working With the LoKomat® Exoskeleton VS C-Mill® Treadmill for Gait Recovery in Rehabilitation and Improvement of Quality of Life in Adult Stroke Patients. Randomised Clinical Trial.

The use of robotic technology for the treatment of gait in neurological pathologies has provided different results in scientific evidence. In patients with some types of acquired brain damage, such as stroke, the use of Lokomat® therapy can bring improvements in aspects such as gait speed and balance, among other parameters and report greater functional recovery in subacute patients with greater deterioration. Similarly, the use of another technological element such as the C-Mill® reports improvements in various aspects of ambulation and balance in gait treatments for stroke patients. Likewise, the impact on the person's recovery is not only beneficial for gait rehabilitation, but also improves the perception of well-being, which can be positive in the process of readaptation to daily life.

The effect of both treatments for gait rehabilitation in adults with stroke and their impact on quality of life in the neurorehabilitation clinic will be studied.

adults with stroke and their impact on quality of life at the Lescer neurorehabilitation clinic Lescer, Madrid (Spain). Participants will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Salamanca, Spain, 37002
        • Recruiting
        • Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of stroke (haemorrhagic and/or ischaemic) by a specialist physician. .
  • Subjects who are cognitively capable and who sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination < 24.), or impairment that prevents correct understanding of the correct understanding of the messages and explanatory orders of the treatment and its conditions.
  • Diagnosis of concomitant neurological diseases and craniocerebral trauma. cranioencephalic trauma.
  • Other diseases that interfere with the gait process (e.g. disabling arthritis or arthrosis, other neurological diseases, other neurological diseases).

disabling arthritis or osteoarthritis, other concomitant neurological diseases, etc.).

- Contraindications of the robotic tools themselves.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lokomat

To compare the effectiveness of gait rehabilitation work in adult stroke patients using the Lokomat® tool vs.

stroke with the Lokomat® tool.

To compare the effectiveness of gait rehabilitation work in adult stroke patients using the Lokomat® tool vs.

stroke with the C-Mill® tool

Active Comparator: C-Mill
Exoelectric walking aid for patients who have suffered a stroke
Exoelectric walking aid for patients who have suffered a stroke

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of life scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
QoL39 scale. 0 minimum - 100 maximum (higher scores mean a better outcome).
12 weeks
Spasticity index
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Tardieu scale 0 min - 5 max (higher scores mean a worse outcome).
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 20, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on C-Mill

Subscribe