- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07270016
Pilot-Testing Real-Time Engagement for Learning to Effectively Control Type 2 Diabetes (REFLECT2DPilot)
February 18, 2026 updated by: Mary Ellen Vajravelu, MD, University of Pittsburgh
Real-Time Engagement for Learning to Effectively Control Type 2 Diabetes: Pilot Study
The goal of this study is to pilot test features of a new smartphone app and to gather feedback related to wearing a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and a Fitbit device, as well as to obtain input on health behavior-focused messages delivered through the app.
The study will enroll English-speaking participants aged 16-24 years who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes before age 18. Participants will be asked to fill out surveys about diabetes, physical activity, and diet before and after wearing a CGM for 30 days.
At the end of wearing the CGM, participants will complete an interview about their experience.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
30
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Mary Ellen Vajravelu, MD, MSHP
- Phone Number: 4126926533
- Email: maryellen.vajravelu@pitt.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
- Recruiting
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
-
Contact:
- Mary Ellen Vajravelu, MD, MSHP
- Phone Number: 412-692-6533
- Email: MaryEllen.Vajravelu@pitt.edu
-
Contact:
- Ana Diaz, RN
- Phone Number: 412-692-6862
- Email: amd148@pitt.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Ages 16-24 years, any sex or gender
- Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in childhood (younger than 18 years of age)
- English-speaking (app in English)
- Possession of personal smartphone that is compatible with FreeStyle Libre app
Exclusion Criteria:
• Cognitive impairment or severe psychiatric conditions that could interfere with participation in behavioral intervention for diabetes self-management
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single-arm pilot study
Participants will engage in pilot-testing a novel smartphone app supporting health behavior change and wear a continuous glucose monitoring device and Fitbit physical activity tracker for 30 days.
Questionnaires and interviews will be used to gather participant experiences with the app and device wear.
|
Participants will wear study-provided continuous glucose monitoring device and Fitbit physical activity tracker for 30 consecutive days.
During the same period, they will use an investigator-developed smartphone app (Healthmine), which is being developed to pair CGM and Fitbit data.
Participants will receive up to one message about health behavior change (e.g., physical activity, nutrition) daily and will be able to use Healthmine to log exercise and dietary intake.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Usability of Healthmine app
Time Frame: 15 days and 30 days after starting study-provided CGM and Healthmine app use
|
Assessed via the System Usability Scale (SUS), a 10-item questionnaire measuring perceived usability of a system or technology.
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree").
The total SUS score is calculated by summing the score contributions from each item (for odd-numbered items, subtract 1 from the user response; for even-numbered items, subtract the user response from 5), multiplying the sum by 2.5, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better perceived usability, with scores above 68 considered above average usability.
|
15 days and 30 days after starting study-provided CGM and Healthmine app use
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Days with CGM data
Time Frame: 30-day CGM wear period
|
The number of days with continuous glucose monitoring data available will be divided by the total number of requested days of wear (30) to obtain percentage of days with data.
|
30-day CGM wear period
|
|
Days with Fitbit data
Time Frame: 30-day Fitbit wear period
|
The number of days with Fitbit data available will be divided by the total number of requested days of wear (30) to obtain percentage of days with data.
|
30-day Fitbit wear period
|
|
Mean CGM glucose
Time Frame: 30-day CGM wear period
|
Mean glucose obtained from study-provided CGM
|
30-day CGM wear period
|
|
Step count
Time Frame: 30-day Fitbit wear period
|
Step count data will be obtained via study-provided Fitbit.
|
30-day Fitbit wear period
|
|
Diabetes Self-Management
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 days (change from baseline to 30 days)
|
Assessed via the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ), a 16-item self-report questionnaire measuring diabetes self-care activities associated with glycemic control.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = "does not apply to me" to 3 = "applies to me very much").
Items are summed (after reverse-coding negatively worded items) and transformed to a 0-10 scale, where higher scores indicate better self-management.
|
Baseline and 30 days (change from baseline to 30 days)
|
|
Treatment Self-Regulation
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 days (change from baseline to 30 days)
|
Assessed via the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ), a questionnaire measuring the degree to which a person's motivation for health behaviors is relatively autonomous (self-determined) versus controlled (motivated by external factors).
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "not at all true" to 7 = "very true").
The TSRQ yields subscale scores for autonomous regulation, controlled regulation, and amotivation, with higher scores on each subscale indicating greater levels of that type of motivation.
|
Baseline and 30 days (change from baseline to 30 days)
|
|
Self-Reported Physical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 days (change from baseline to 30 days)
|
Assessed via the PACE+ Physical Activity Measure, a brief self-report questionnaire measuring physical activity levels.
Participants report the number of days per week they engage in moderate or vigorous physical activity for at least 30 minutes (or 60 minutes for adolescents).
The measure yields separate scores for moderate and vigorous activity (each ranging from 0-7 days per week), with higher scores indicating greater physical activity frequency.
|
Baseline and 30 days (change from baseline to 30 days)
|
|
Diet Quality
Time Frame: Baseline and 30 days (change from baseline to 30 days)
|
Assessed via the Prime Diet Quality Score (PDQS), a food-based dietary assessment tool that evaluates diet quality across 15 food group components.
The PDQS includes 10 adequacy components (dark green leafy vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, carrots, other vegetables, citrus fruits, other fruits, fish/seafood, eggs, whole grains, and low-fat dairy) and 5 moderation components (red meat as main dish, processed meat, refined grains and baked goods, sugar-sweetened beverages, and fried foods).
Each component is scored based on consumption frequency, with higher scores indicating greater intake of health-promoting foods and lower intake of foods that should be consumed in moderation.
The total PDQS ranges from 0-30, with higher scores indicating better overall diet quality.
|
Baseline and 30 days (change from baseline to 30 days)
|
|
Glucose monitoring satisfaction
Time Frame: 30 days (following CGM wear period)
|
Assessed via the Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS) for Type 2 Diabetes, a 15-item questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with their glucose monitoring device.
Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "strongly disagree" to 5 = "strongly agree").
The GMSS yields four subscale scores: Openness (items 1, 8, 10, 14), Emotional Burden (items 2, 5, 9, 13), Behavioral Burden (items 3, 6, 11, 15), and Worthwhileness (items 4, 7 [reverse coded], 12).
Subscale scores are calculated as the mean of item responses, with higher scores indicating greater openness, greater burden (for burden subscales), and greater worthwhileness, respectively.
A total satisfaction score is calculated as the mean of all items after reverse-coding items 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15, with higher total scores indicating greater overall satisfaction with glucose monitoring.
|
30 days (following CGM wear period)
|
|
Glucose coefficient of variation
Time Frame: 30-day CGM wear period
|
Based on CGM glucoses, coefficient of variation will be calculated by dividing the standard deviation of glucose readings by the mean glucose level, then multiplying by 100 to get a percentage.
|
30-day CGM wear period
|
|
Glucose time below range
Time Frame: 30-day CGM wear period
|
Percent of time with CGM glucose less than 70 mg/dL
|
30-day CGM wear period
|
|
Glucose time in range
Time Frame: 30-day CGM wear period
|
Percent of time with CGM glucose 70-180 mg/dL
|
30-day CGM wear period
|
|
Glucose time above range
Time Frame: 30-day CGM wear period
|
Percent of time with CGM glucose above 180 mg/dL
|
30-day CGM wear period
|
|
Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions
Time Frame: 30-day CGM wear period
|
A measure of glucose variability calculated from CGM data, calculated by dividing the standard deviation of glucose readings by the mean glucose level, then multiplying by 100 to get a percentage.
|
30-day CGM wear period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mary Ellen Vajravelu, MD, MSHP, University of Pittsburgh
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 16, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 25, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
December 8, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 20, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 18, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY25100193
- 1R01DK137803-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract: NIDDK)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hyperglycemia
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedHospital Hyperglycemia | Post-transplant HyperglycemiaUnited States
-
Zealand University HospitalNot yet recruitingStress Hyperglycemia | Postoperative Hyperglycemia
-
University of CopenhagenUnknownSurgery--Complications | Hyperglycemia Stress | Hyperglycemia Steroid-inducedDenmark
-
University of LeedsCompletedEffect of Food on Postprandial HyperglycemiaUnited Kingdom
-
Zealand University HospitalRecruitingAnesthesia | Surgical Procedure, Unspecified | Hyperglycemia Stress | Continuous Glucose Monitoring | Hyperglycemia Steroid-inducedDenmark
-
University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenCompletedPancreatectomy; HyperglycemiaDenmark
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); National...TerminatedHyperglycemia StressUnited States
-
Loughborough UniversityUniversity of BedfordshireCompletedPostprandial HyperglycemiaUnited Kingdom
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconEli Lilly and Company; AstraZenecaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Healthmine app
-
University of VictoriaRecruiting
-
Hypnalgesics, LLCTufts UniversityCompletedDental Anxiety | Opioid Use | Drug Use | Dental PainUnited States
-
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteCompletedCancer | Financial Toxicity | Question Prompt ListUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoConquer Cancer FoundationCompletedProstate Cancer | Metastatic Prostate Cancer | Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Chang Gung UniversityChang Gung Memorial HospitalRecruiting
-
New York UniversityJoon, Inc.RecruitingDepression | Stress | Anxiety | Executive Dysfunction | Behavior, Child | Disruptive Behavior | Attention-deficitUnited States
-
University of Sao PauloNot yet recruitingPostpartum Depression
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institutes of Health (NIH)Completed
-
Florida Atlantic UniversityCompletedHealth BehaviorUnited States
-
Kent State UniversitySumma Health SystemUnknown