Less is Better? Effectiveness of a Short Local Vibration Protocol on Neuromuscular Function (VIB-EXPRESS)

Local vibration is a non-invasive neuromuscular stimulation modality used in training and rehabilitation for its effects on neuromuscular function, particularly its ability to induce nervous adaptations. Its passive application is particularly useful in cases of motor deficit or immobilization.

Several studies, including our own, have shown that vibration protocols over several weeks can induce significant gains in muscle strength, particularly in the knee extensors. However, the parameters of application remain heterogeneous, particularly with regard to the duration of the interventions.

With this in mind, a prospective controlled study is being conducted in healthy subjects, comparing four modalities of local vibration intervention targeting the knee extensors: an intensive vibration protocol over 5 consecutive days (1 session of 30 or 60 minutes per day) and a protocol spread over 4 weeks at a rate of 3 weekly sessions of 30 or 60 minutes). The objective is to evaluate and compare their immediate and delayed effects on force production and corticospinal properties. The results of this study will thus help optimize recommendations regarding the use of local vibration in muscle strengthening and neuromuscular reconditioning strategies.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Saint-Etienne
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Léonard FEASSON, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Clément FOSCHIA, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Philippe BOIRON, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ronan PLANCHER, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rémi VASSEUR, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thomas LAPOLE, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women,
  • Aged between 18 and 45,
  • With a body mass index between 18 and 30 kg/m²,
  • Who have received detailed information about the study and have co-signed the consent form with the investigator,
  • Who are affiliated with or entitled to social security coverage.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with chronic cardiovascular, neuromuscular, bone, metabolic, and/or inflammatory conditions,
  • Personal history and/or risk factors for thrombosis,
  • Subjects undergoing antidepressant treatment,
  • Subjects who have taken corticosteroid treatment in the last 3 months,
  • Use of neuroactive substances likely to alter corticospinal excitability (hypnotics, antiepileptics, psychotropic drugs, muscle relaxants) during the study period,
  • History of bone or ligament trauma to the lower limbs within the last 12 months,
  • Unable to perform the physical efforts required for the study,
  • Engaging in intense and unusual physical activity, including competitive sports, in the month preceding and during the protocol,
  • Presence of a skin lesion at the site where the vibrator is to be placed,
  • Simultaneous participation in another interventional medical trial,
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  • Subjects unable to understand the purpose and conditions of the study, unable to give their consent,
  • Subjects deprived of their liberty or subject to legal protection such as guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group "5 days and 30 min"
Participants will follow a protocol involving local vibration applied to the quadriceps muscle for 5 consecutive days, at a rate of one 30-minute session per day.
The vibrations will be delivered using the Vibramoov Physio device, positioned directly on the quadriceps muscle. The participant will be seated comfortably and will remain at rest throughout the session. The vibration settings will be set to an amplitude of 1 mm and a frequency of 100 Hz.
Other Names:
  • Vibramoov Physio
Experimental: Group "5 days and 60 min"
Participants will follow a protocol involving local vibration applied to the quadriceps muscle for 5 consecutive days, at a rate of one 60-minute session per day.
The vibrations will be delivered using the Vibramoov Physio device, positioned directly on the quadriceps muscle. The participant will be seated comfortably and will remain at rest throughout the session. The vibration settings will be set to an amplitude of 1 mm and a frequency of 100 Hz.
Other Names:
  • Vibramoov Physio
Experimental: Group "4-weeks and 30 min"
Participants will follow a protocol involving local vibration applied to the quadriceps muscle over a period of 4 weeks, with 3 weekly sessions of 30 minutes each, for a total of 12 sessions.
The vibrations will be delivered using the Vibramoov Physio device, positioned directly on the quadriceps muscle. The participant will be seated comfortably and will remain at rest throughout the session. The vibration settings will be set to an amplitude of 1 mm and a frequency of 100 Hz.
Other Names:
  • Vibramoov Physio
Experimental: Group "4-weeks and 60 min"
Participants will follow a protocol involving local vibration applied to the quadriceps muscle over a period of 4 weeks, with 3 weekly sessions of 60 minutes each, for a total of 12 sessions.
The vibrations will be delivered using the Vibramoov Physio device, positioned directly on the quadriceps muscle. The participant will be seated comfortably and will remain at rest throughout the session. The vibration settings will be set to an amplitude of 1 mm and a frequency of 100 Hz.
Other Names:
  • Vibramoov Physio

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the effect of the duration of a local vibration program (5 days vs 4 weeks), as well as the effect of the duration of the sessions (30 min vs 60 min) on the gain in knee extension strength in healthy volunteers.
Time Frame: Five times: before the procedure (baseline); at the end of the procedure (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70), and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the procedure.
The primary endpoint will be the relative change in maximum isometric strength of the knee extensors (expressed as a percentage increased), assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer.
Five times: before the procedure (baseline); at the end of the procedure (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70), and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the effect of the duration of a local vibration program (5 days vs 4 weeks), as well as the effect of the duration of the sessions (30 min vs 60 min) on corticospinal properties and, more specifically, on the level of voluntary activation
Time Frame: Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
The level of voluntary activation (in %) will be determined by the increase in force obtained following electrical nerve stimulation during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction. An electrical stimulator will deliver rectangular electrical pulses (400 V max, pulse duration: 1 ms) to the femoral nerve through the skin.
Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Compare the effect of the duration of a local vibration program (5 days vs 4 weeks), as well as the effect of the duration of the sessions (30 min vs 60 min) on functional motor abilities and, more specifically, maximum voluntary strength
Time Frame: Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Strength (Nm) will be assessed on an isokinetic dynamometer. Two concentric contraction speeds will be tested: 60°/s and 180°/s (also assessed for the contralateral leg).
Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Compare the effect of the duration of a local vibration program (5 days vs 4 weeks), as well as the effect of the duration of the sessions (30 min vs 60 min) on functional motor skills and, more specifically, jumping performance.
Time Frame: Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Jumping performance (height, in cm) will be assessed using validated vertical jump tests: Squat Jump and Counter Movement Jump.
Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Compare the effect of the duration of a local vibration program (5 days vs 4 weeks), as well as the effect of the duration of the sessions (30 min vs 60 min) on functional motor skills and, more specifically, the rate of force development (RFD)
Time Frame: Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
The RFD (expressed in N/s), an indicator of explosive strength, will be assessed for the knee extensor muscles from the initial phases of isometric contraction on an isokinetic dynamometer.
Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Compare the effect of the duration of a local vibration program (5 days vs 4 weeks), as well as the effect of the duration of the sessions (30 min vs 60 min) on corticospinal properties and, more specifically, corticospinal excitability.
Time Frame: Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Cortico-spinal excitability will be assessed using electromyographic responses (motor evoked potentials, in mV) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Compare the effect of the duration of a local vibration program (5 days vs 4 weeks), as well as the effect of the duration of the sessions (30 min vs 60 min) on corticospinal properties and, more specifically, spinal excitability
Time Frame: Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Spinal excitability (in mV) will be assessed by recording electromyographic responses evoked by electrical stimulation at the femoral nerve and spinal cord (thoracic motor evoked potentials).
Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Compare the effect of the duration of a local vibration program (5 days vs 4 weeks), as well as the effect of the duration of the sessions (30 min vs 60 min) on corticospinal properties and, more specifically, cortical activation of sensorimotor areas.
Time Frame: Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.
Cortical activation of sensorimotor areas will be assessed by recording the electroencephalographic signal during submaximal isometric contractions. A flexible 64-electrode cap will be placed on the subject's head and a gel will be applied to improve signal reception. The signal will be recorded at rest during a 3-minute period of muscle inactivity, then during a 30-minute vibration session.
Five times: before the intervention (baseline); at the end of the intervention (day 21 or day 42 depending on the group); then 1 week (day 28 or day 49), 1 month (day 49 or day 70) and 3 months (day 105 or day 126) after the intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Léonard FEASSON, MD, PhD, Chu de Saint Etienne

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 23, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 22, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 22, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 25CH170
  • ANSM (Other Identifier: 2026-A01275-46)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Volonteers

Clinical Trials on Local vibration protocol

Subscribe