Predictive Value of Minimal Residual Disease for Postoperative Recurrence and Adjuvant PD-1 Inhibitor in HCC

January 9, 2026 updated by: Wan-Guang Zhang, Tongji Hospital

Predictive Value of Minimal Residual Disease for Postoperative Recurrence and Adjuvant PD-1 Inhibitor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading global cause of cancer-related mortality. While curative resection is pivotal, high postoperative recurrence rates remain a major challenge. Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show promise in improving outcomes, but biomarkers to identify patients who will benefit are lacking. Current clinicopathological risk factors for minimal residual disease (MRD) are suboptimal in sensitivity and specificity.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis, reflecting real-time tumor dynamics, offers a promising approach for MRD detection. This study focuses on the methylation status of GNB4 and Riplet-genes located within HCC-associated CpG islands-using a bespoke bisulfite-conversion and qPCR assay to sensitively detect methylated alleles, thereby enabling MRD monitoring.

To clinically validate this approach, we will conduct a prospective, multicenter cohort study assessing the predictive value of serial *GNB4/Riplet* methylation testing for recurrence and adjuvant therapy benefit.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading global malignancy and a primary cause of mortality in patients with chronic liver disease. While curative resection offers a critical treatment strategy, postoperative recurrence remains a major obstacle. Emerging evidence suggests adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, may improve disease-free survival; however, identifying the patient subgroup most likely to benefit remains challenging. Theoretically, patients at high risk for minimal residual disease (MRD) post-surgery represent the ideal target for adjuvant treatment. Current clinical practice relies on indirect pathological surrogates of MRD-such as microvascular invasion, poor differentiation, or satellite nodules-which lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity.

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA), with its short half-life, dynamically mirrors tumor evolution, making it a promising tool for monitoring recurrence. The genes GNB4 and Riplet are located within CpG islands strongly associated with hepatocarcinogenesis. We developed specific primers and fluorescent probes targeting their bisulfite-converted sequences to enable selective PCR-based detection of methylated alleles. Monitoring MRD via *GNB4/Riplet* methylation status thus offers a potential method for dynamic assessment of tumor progression and recurrence, optimizing patient risk stratification and guiding therapeutic decisions.

To evaluate this approach, we will conduct a prospective, multi-center cohort study to investigate the predictive value of MRD for recurrence and adjuvant therapy benefit. The study comprises two cohorts: 1) an Active Surveillance Cohort, undergoing a pre-operative MRD assessment followed by regular post-operative surveillance and serial MRD testing; and 2) an Adjuvant Therapy Cohort, receiving pre-operative MRD assessment followed by standard adjuvant PD-1 inhibitor therapy alongside serial MRD monitoring. This study aims to validate a more effective tool for predicting recurrence and to identify patients most likely to benefit from adjuvant immunotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

276

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430000
        • Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 75 years, inclusive, regardless of gender.
  • Newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with HCC.
  • Received radical treatments, such as liver resection or microwave ablation.
  • Combine at least one of the risk factors for tumor recurrence, such as microvascular/macrovascular invasion, poor differentiation, satellite nodules, multiple tumors, and tumor diameter greater than 5 cm.
  • Child-Pugh liver function score ≤ 7.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Absence of severe organic diseases affecting the heart, lungs, brain, or other major organs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of other malignancies.
  • Recurrent HCC.
  • Prior systemic therapy for HCC.
  • Unable to complete the follow-up and dynamic MRD monitoring.
  • Having an immune deficiency disorder.
  • Allergic to PD-1 inhibitors or unable to tolerate related treatments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Postoperative active monitoring cohort
The postoperative active monitoring cohort collected a single blood sample for MRD monitoring before the surgery, and then dynamically collected blood samples for MRD monitoring at each follow-up visit after the surgery. This cohort only received active monitoring after the surgery.
The patients in the active monitoring cohort only received regular follow-up and MRD testing after the surgery.
Experimental: Postoperative PD-1 inhibitor adjuvant therapy cohort
The postoperative PD-1 inhibitor-adjuvant cohort collected one blood sample for MRD monitoring before surgery, and dynamically collected blood samples for MRD monitoring at each follow-up visit after surgery. This cohort received only regular PD-1 inhibitor-assisted treatment after surgery.
The patients in the postoperative adjuvant treatment cohort received regular PD-1 inhibitor adjuvant therapy (Sintilimab), once every 21 days, for a total of 8 times, and undergoing dynamic MRD testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival(DFS)
Time Frame: From date of surgery until the date of first documented recurrence or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.
DFS is defined as the time from surgery to the first recurrence. The difference in DFS between the two cohorts is compared.
From date of surgery until the date of first documented recurrence or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival(OS)
Time Frame: From date of surgery until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 96 months.
OS is defined as the time from surgery to the date of death.
From date of surgery until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 96 months.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Association between dynamic Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) status and Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: From baseline up to 24 months.
The predictive efficacy of dynamic MRD monitoring for recurrence. MRD will be assessed in peripheral blood samples at specified time points. The association between MRD status (positive/negative) and DFS will be quantified using Cox proportional hazards regression. The primary analysis will evaluate the hazard ratio for recurrence or death in MRD-positive vs. MRD-negative participants.
From baseline up to 24 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrence

Clinical Trials on Active monitoring

Subscribe