- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07357493
metaCARpal Bone Osteosynthesis Trail (CARBO)
The CARBO Study (metaCARpal Bone Osteosynthesis)
Background Metacarpal shaft fractures account for 30-50% of hand fractures (Karl et al., 2015; Kollitz et al., 2014; van Onselen et al., 2003), with diaphyseal spiral and oblique fractures of the second to fifth ray posing unique challenges due to the risks of shortening and rotational deformities. Current standard care of displaced fractures involves operative fixation.
However, retrospective studies have indicated that nonoperative treatment, involving early mobilization or buddy taping, can achieve outcomes comparable to operative treatment (Daher et al., 2023). There is only one published, with a small sample size, randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating this issue (Peyronson et al., 2023). This highlights the need for a robust multicenter RCT to address these gaps in evidence.
Aim The aim of this study is to compare the one-year outcomes of non-operative treatment involving immediate unrestricted mobilization versus operative treatment of displaced oblique or spiral diaphyseal metacarpal fractures in adults.
Materials and Methods This is a multicenter, pragmatic, prospective, noninferiority RCT involving 552 adult patients with displaced oblique and/or spiral diaphyseal metacarpal fractures of the second to fifth ray. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either nonoperative treatment with unrestricted mobilization and rehabilitation) or operative treatment (with screw or plate fixation) followed by rehabilitation.
The primary outcome is grip-strength in the injured hand presented in kilograms at one year.
Secondary outcomes include questionnaires, complications, range of motion, patient reported outcome measures, health related quality of life, patient satisfaction, and radiographic healing.
A power calculation proposes a study size of 552 participants to detect a noninferiority margin of 10% in grip strength.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro, Associate professor
- Phone Number: +46709280114
- Email: cecilia.mellstrand.navarro@ki.se
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Elsa Pihl, PhD
- Phone Number: +46739705669
- Email: elsa.pihl@ki.se
Study Locations
-
-
Stockholm County
-
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden, 18288
- Recruiting
- Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd's hospital
-
Principal Investigator:
- Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro, MD, PhD
-
Contact:
- Cecilia Mellstrand Navarro, MD, Ass Professor
- Phone Number: +46 709 280114
- Email: cecilia.mellstrand.navarro@ki.se
-
Contact:
- Elsa Pihl, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +46739705669
- Email: elsa.pihl@ki.se
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Elsa Pihl, MD, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Access to a valid e-mail.
- Injury within 10 days prior to inclusion.
- Normal bilateral hand function prior to injury.
- Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent
- Single, displaced spiral or oblique diaphyseal fracture of the second to fifth metacarpals with definition of diaphysis as described by AO 2018 (AO/OTA as 77.2-5.2A) (Meinberg et al., 2018).
- Fracture line length at least twice the diameter of the bone at the level of the fracture.
- Fractures with at least 2 mm of radiological displacement and/or malrotation of injured finger compared to uninjured side regardless of fracture displacement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient IS NOT expected to have difficulty adhering to the study protocol (e.g., due to insufficient language proficiency, dementia, substance abuse, or other reasons).
- The patient DOES NOT have an open fracture (Gustilo-Anderson grade > I) or a pathological fracture.
- The patient DOES NOT have an ipsilateral fracture of the upper extremity, polytrauma, or generalized joint dysfunction (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Non-operative with early mobilization
Participants randomized to the nonoperative group will receive immediate unrestricted mobilization, with optional buddy taping or removable splinting for comfort.
Closed reduction will not be attempted.
Rehabilitation protocol with early mobilization will be standardized across study centers with printed standardized information to patients and rehabilitation staff.
|
Participants randomized to the nonoperative group will receive immediate unrestricted mobilization, with optional buddy taping or removable splinting for comfort.
Closed reduction will not be attempted.
Rehabilitation protocol with early mobilization will be standardized across study centers with printed standardized information to patients and rehabilitation staff.
|
|
Active Comparator: Operative
Participants randomized to the operative group will undergo open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the MSF.
Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered according to local guidelines.
The surgical approach and fixation method (e.g.
compression screws and/or plate, not K-wires) will be at the discretion of the treating surgeon, following standard surgical principles.
Postoperative immobilisation will adhere to surgeons' preference but not exceed two weeks fixation.
|
Participants randomized to the operative group will undergo open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the MSF.
Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis will be administered according to local guidelines.
The surgical approach and fixation method (e.g.
compression screws and/or plate, not K-wires) will be at the discretion of the treating surgeon, following standard surgical principles.
Postoperative immobilisation will adhere to surgeons' preference but not exceed two weeks fixation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Grip strength
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
The primary outcome is grip-strength measured in the injured hand using a JAMAR dynamometer at 12 months and presented in kilograms.
Measurement method will follow the technical description presented in the HAKIR manual (HAKIR, 2023).
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Complications
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
infection, malunion, nerve injury, reoperation
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Pain in injured hand NRS
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) at rest and when it is at its worst
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Rotational deformity
Time Frame: 12 months
|
0 - no deformity, 1 - minimal deformity, 2 - clearly visible deformity but acceptable functional limitation, 3 - great deformity and functional limitation
|
12 months
|
|
PROM - patient rated outcome measure
Time Frame: 6, 12 weeks, 12 months
|
Quick-DASH-9 score (Gabel et al., 2009)
|
6, 12 weeks, 12 months
|
|
Range of motion
Time Frame: 6, 12 weeks, 12 months
|
total active motion and extension lag
|
6, 12 weeks, 12 months
|
|
Pinch grip strength
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 12 months
|
12 weeks, 12 months
|
|
|
Radiographic shortening
Time Frame: 12 months
|
according to Sletten (Sletten et al., 2013)
|
12 months
|
|
Radiographic healing
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 12 months
|
defined as bridging callus formation over the fracture line on a plain x-ray anterio-posterior and/or lateral projection.
(Hayes et al., 2023)
|
12 weeks, 12 months
|
|
Sick leave duration
Time Frame: 12 months
|
in days
|
12 months
|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
Patient Acceptable Symptom State, PASS (Daryoush et al., 2025)
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Quality of life measured by PROM
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
EQ-5D EuroQol Group, 1990; Taft et al., 2004)
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
|
Quality of life measured by SF-12
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
SF-12 (EuroQol Group, 1990; Taft et al., 2004)
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025-04413-01
- FoUI-1022484 (Other Grant/Funding Number: ALF Region Stockholm)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Metacarpal Shaft Fractures
-
Karolinska InstitutetRecruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Sud FrancilienRecruitingNon-thumb Metacarpal Shaft FractureFrance
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationUnknownMetacarpal Shaft FracturesIsrael
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterRecruitingForearm Fractures (Both Bone Forearm Fractures, Isolated Ulnar Shaft, Isolated Radial Shaft)United States
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedHip Fractures | Femoral Shaft FracturesUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverCompletedMetacarpal FractureUnited States
-
Mohamed Ali HelmiCompletedMetacarpal FractureEgypt
-
NYU Langone HealthWithdrawnFemoral Shaft Fracture | Tibial Shaft FractureUnited States
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Sohag UniversityRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Non-operative treatment with early mobilization
-
Uppsala UniversityCompletedMetacarpal FractureSweden
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompletedFracture | ClavicleFinland
-
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gulhane Tip FakultesiCompleted
-
Tampere University HospitalRegionshospitalet Viborg, Skive; Central Finland Hospital District; Satakunta...CompletedDistal Radius FractureSweden, Finland, Denmark
-
Luzerner KantonsspitalArthrex GmbHNot yet recruiting
-
Unity Health TorontoUniversity of British Columbia; McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute... and other collaboratorsCompletedClavicle Fracture | FracturesCanada
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedNursing Caries | Cholelithiases | Perioperative Complication | Bowel IleusTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityActive, not recruitingKnee OsteoarthritisEgypt
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaWithdrawnClavicle FracturesUnited States
-
Foundation University IslamabadActive, not recruitingLumbar RadiculopathyPakistan