- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07379996
"Pilot Study of Music Intervention for Recovery of People With Severe Mental Disorder in the Community"
"Music Therapy in the Recovery Process of Individuals With Severe Mental Disorder in the Community Setting: A Pilot Study."
The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of music therapy on hope, quality of life, and social functioning in individuals with Severe Mental Disorder in the community.
The main research questions were:
Can music therapy increase the level of hope in individuals with Severe Mental Disorder? Can music therapy improve the quality of life of individuals with Severe Mental Disorder? Can music therapy enhance the social functioning of individuals with Severe Mental Disorder?
Participants were users of a Community Mental Health Care Team called the Assertive Community Treatment Team.
A total of 12 music therapy sessions were conducted, each lasting 45-60 minutes. Participants selected the songs or sounds they wanted to listen to based on the session theme, followed by a dialogue between the participant and the nurse.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Murcia
-
Cartagena, Murcia, Spain, 30203
- Mental Health Rehabilitation Unit of Cartagena
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Individuals aged 16 years or older.
- Individuals without severe hearing impairment.
- Individuals without cognitive deficits that would prevent them from reading or understanding the study documents.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a severe hearing impairment.
- Inability to read or understand the proposed questionnaires.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Individuals with Severe Mental Disorder from an Assertive Community Treatment Team
The study was conducted within a community-based service for individuals with Severe Mental Disorder, called the Assertive Community Treatment Team (ACT Team), located in the city of Cartagena, Spain. The study participants were active users currently receiving care from this service. |
The intervention was administered individually, and the authors based it on a review of the scientific literature on studies that evaluated the main proposed variables: quality of life, social functioning, and hope. In general, participants selected the music they wished to listen to for each session, following the nurse's guidance, and a dialogue was then established between the participant and the nurse. The intervention lasted approximately 20 weeks, with a weekly or biweekly frequency. The intervention consisted of 12 sessions, each lasting 45-60 minutes. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
WHOQOL-BREF - Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20)
|
This self-administered questionnaire assesses an individual's quality of life across four domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment).
It also includes an evaluation of perceived general health and overall quality of life.
The questionnaire consists of 26 items with five response options (1-5).
The higher the score in each domain, the better the quality of life profile of the person being assessed.
|
This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20)
|
|
Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20).
|
This self-administered questionnaire assesses an individual's negative perceptions about the future and suicide risk.
It consists of 20 items with true/false response options.
The results indicate four levels of hopelessness: 0-3 (normal/asymptomatic), 4-8 (mild), 9-14 (moderate), and 15-20 (severe).
|
This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20).
|
|
Social Functioning Scale (SFS)
Time Frame: This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20).
|
The self-administered version of this scale assesses seven dimensions of social functioning: Social isolation: 0 to 3 per item, with a total score range of 0-15. Interpersonal behavior: 4 items. First, items 1 and 2 are summed; if their combined score exceeds 3, a maximum of 3 is assigned. The remaining two items are scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a total score range of 0-9. Prosocial activities: 22 items, scored 0 to 3, total score range 0-66. Leisure: 15 items, scored 0 to 3, total score range 0-45. Independence-performance: 13 items, scored 0 to 3, total score range 0-39. Independence-competence: 13 items, scored 1 to 3, total score range 13-39. Employment/occupation: A score of up to 6 points is possible if the patient feels capable of performing some type of work and is making frequent attempts to find employment. It includes 78 items. Higher scores consistently indicate a higher level of social functioning in each domain. |
This questionnaire was administered at three time points: at baseline (Day 1 of the intervention), at mid-intervention (around Week 10), and at the end of the intervention (Week 20).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with the received intervention
Time Frame: At the end of the intervention, in Week 20.
|
The participants completed a self-developed satisfaction survey to assess their level of satisfaction with the intervention, measured using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).
|
At the end of the intervention, in Week 20.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEI.24-93.TFM-A.VargasRubio
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Severe Mental Disorder
-
Alejando Vargas RubioActive, not recruitingSevere Mental Disorder | Severe Mental IllnessSpain
-
IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliRecruitingSevere Mental Disorder | Severe Mental IllnessItaly
-
Versailles HospitalAgence régionale de santé Ile de France; UNION NATIONALE DE FAMILLES ET AMIS...Not yet recruiting
-
University of Roma La SapienzaNot yet recruitingSevere Mental Disorder
-
Temple UniversityNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...CompletedSevere Mental DisorderUnited States
-
Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Dr. Ramón de...Columbia University; Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.; Instituto...Enrolling by invitation
-
Norwegian Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Tromso; Nordlandssykehuset HF; University of Melbourne; The University... and other collaboratorsUnknownSevere Mental DisorderNorway
-
University of BernUniversity of Zurich; Swiss National Science FoundationCompletedSevere Mental DisorderSwitzerland
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...University Ramon LlullActive, not recruiting
-
ArkinTilburg University; Ggz Oost Brabant; GGZ de Viersprong; Stichting Altrecht GGZ; Stichting...RecruitingSevere Personality DisorderNetherlands
Clinical Trials on Passive music therapy in an individual format
-
University of HaifaCompletedAging | Executive Function | Social Behavior | Cognitive Function 1, Social | Aging WellIsrael
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNorth Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences InstituteCompletedAutonomic Nervous System Imbalance | Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal Axis SuppressionUnited States
-
Wayne State UniversityCompletedNeurological DisordersUnited States
-
Universiti Tunku Abdul RahmanCompletedPrehypertension | Blood Pressure | Resting Heart RateMalaysia
-
Universidad Católica San Antonio de MurciaCompleted
-
University of MalayaCompletedStroke | Dementia | Traumatic Brain InjuryMalaysia
-
Karolinska InstitutetKarolinska University Hospital; Umeå University; Leiden University; Dalarna University and other collaboratorsWithdrawnNeoplasm, Breast | Neoplasm, Colorectal | Neoplasm, OvarianSweden
-
Stanford UniversityEpilepsy FoundationCompletedDepressive Disorder | EpilepsyUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedCritically Ill Adult Patients in Intensive Care UnitsKorea, Republic of