Implementation of a Social and Mental Health Support to Promote Recovery in Five Mental Health Facilities in Paris Area (PASSVERS-2)

March 24, 2022 updated by: Dr Christine PASSERIEUX, Versailles Hospital

Implantation Sur Cinq Centres Médico-Psychologiques Franciliens du Parcours Socio-Sanitaire orienté Vers le Rétablissement (PASSVers2)

Prospective longitudinal uncontrolled multicenter study, with cohort follow-up, focusing on patients, professionals, relatives and structures evolution during the implementation of recovery based intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a hybrid efficacy-implementation Type I recovery based interventional study based on a multicenter follow-up of a cohort of 300 patients with severe and persistent mental disorders (60 patients per center). The evolution of concepts and means of evaluation now allow a precise description of the mechanisms of recovery in all the diversity of its expression among patients, their entourages and the psychiatric facilities.

In the present study, the investigators aim to characterize simultaneously the patients' trajectories and the evolution of the care facilities and their professionals with respect to the principles of recovery. This double exploration should allow to build theoretical and practical references for the extension of this approach to other centers in France.

The study considers a dual timeline for data collection:

  • The timeline associated with patients defined by the inclusion of each patient and extending to 24 months after, punctuated by an assessment at 12 months;
  • The timeline of the inclusion centers and professionals involved in the rehabilitation projects defined by the beginning of the study and extending beyond the end of inclusion of the last patient, punctuated by annual intermediate evaluations of the means allocated by the structure and the positioning of the personnel in terms of recovery.

The intervention consists in a follow-up of the patients and their relatives by a psychiatric nurse and a social worker during 12 months. Both professionals, trained to rehabilitation and recovery principles, will focus on the patient's needs and goals in order to improve the outcome, quality-of-life and clinical status.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Argenteuil, France
        • Centre Hospitalier d'Argenteuil, secteurs 95G05, 95G06, 95G13,
        • Contact:
          • Dr Lamisse, MD
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Sainte Anne - GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, secteur G75015
        • Contact:
          • Dr de Maricourt, MD
      • Rambouillet, France
        • Centre Hospitalier de Plaisir, secteur 78G16, CMP de Rambouillet
        • Contact:
          • Dr Omnès, MD
      • Rueil-Malmaison, France
        • Etablissement de Santé Mentale de Rueil-Malmaison, Groupe MGEN, secteur 92G13, CMP de Rueil-Malmaison
        • Contact:
          • Dr Matthieu, MD
      • Versailles, France
        • Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, secteur 78G17, Centre Bleuler, Versailles
        • Contact:
          • Dr Bratu, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a severe and persistent mental disorder among the following ICD10 compliant diagnostic categories:

    • Schizophrenia spectrum disorder (F2x)
    • Recurrent or persistent mood disorders (F30.x, F31.x, F33.x, F34.x, F38.x)
    • Psychological developmental disorders including autism spectrum disorders (F8x) and childhood and adolescent onset disorders (F9x)
  • Presence of an indication for inclusion in the rehabilitation project identified by the treating psychiatrist and endorsed in the inclusion session by the PASSVers staff.
  • Written consent from the patient or his/her legal representative to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an not stabilized or progressive organic neurological pathology, neurodegenerative disease
  • Psychological or behavioral disorders mainly related to addictions with substances
  • Psychiatric disorders secondary to an organic pathology that is not stabilized or that is evolving
  • The following psychiatric situations are reasons for non-inclusion in the absence of an argued and collegial reassessment (the reason being that, although PASSVers2 must be considered as a first intention proposal in many situations meeting the inclusion criteria, it cannot intervene or be thought of as a "solution" to certain complex situations):

    • Psychiatric disorders caused by pregnancy or immediate postpartum
    • Severe borderline personality disorder
    • Current suicidal crisis
    • Extreme fragility of the patient with respect to changes that may be induced by the project, associated with a high risk of self or hetero-aggression.
    • Patient under justice constraint
  • Foreseeable departure from the geographic area, not allowing for certainty of further evaluation
  • Refusal of the patient to be followed by a social-health team (i.e. refusal of care or refusal of a dialogue on social aspects and projects).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient group (single group)
300 Patients involved in the recovery process.

Passvers intervention aims at :

  • helping patients followed in the centers, presenting a Severe and Persistent Mental Disorder (schizophrenia, mood disorder, autism spectrum disorder, etc.), at risk or in a situation of psychological disability, to enroll in a rehabilitation program towards recovery.
  • supporting the emergence and construction of projects by the people themselves, and to accompany them to realize them.
  • Encouraging the use of resources in their environment and common law mechanisms (city hall, department, associations, etc.) for better social integration.
  • encouraging involvement in care understood as useful tools for the realization of the personal project.

Passvers also aims at :

  • promoting a change in professional practices within the team, in favor of recovery-oriented practices based on the concept of engagement or empowerment.
  • allowing cooperation between health and social structures aiming at destigmatizing mental illness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient self rating of recovery support by caregivers T0
Time Frame: baseline
5-item short version of INSPIRE measure (Brief INSPIRE), range from 5 to 25, 25 corresponds to maximal support
baseline
Patient self rating of recovery support by caregivers T12
Time Frame: 1 year
5-item short version of INSPIRE measure (Brief INSPIRE), range from 5 to 25, 25 corresponds to maximal support
1 year
Patient self rating of recovery support by caregivers and structure T0
Time Frame: baseline
Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA-R), range from 32 to 160, higher values correspond to more perceived help
baseline
Patient self rating of recovery support by caregivers and structure T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Recovery Self-Assessment (RSA-R), range from 32 to 160, higher values correspond to more perceived help
1 year
Patient functioning T0
Time Frame: baseline
Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), range 0-100, 100 corresponds to better functioning
baseline
Patient functioning T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), range 0-100, 100 corresponds to better functioning
1 year
Patient functioning T24
Time Frame: 2 years
Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP), range 0-100, 100 corresponds to better functioning
2 years
Patient self rating of quality of life T0
Time Frame: baseline
Shortened quality of life questionnaire (SQoL-18), range 18-90, higher values correspond to better quality of life
baseline
Patient self rating of quality of life T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Shortened quality of life questionnaire (SQoL-18), range 18-90, higher values correspond to better quality of life
1 year
Patient self rating of quality of life T24
Time Frame: 2 years
Shortened quality of life questionnaire (SQoL-18), range 18-90, higher values correspond to better quality of life
2 years
Psychotic symptoms T0
Time Frame: baseline
Positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), range 30-210, higher values correspond to higher symptoms levels
baseline
Psychotic symptoms T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), range 30-210, higher values correspond to higher symptoms levels
1 year
Depression T0
Time Frame: baseline
Psychiatric symptoms scales rated by the clinicians (CDSS), range 0-27, higher values correspond to higher depressive symptoms
baseline
Depression T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Psychiatric symptoms scales rated by the clinicians (CDSS), range 0-27, higher values correspond to higher depressive symptoms
1 year
Clinical outcome T0: Clinically significant events
Time Frame: baseline
Record of occurrences (boolean) and dates of any clinical event (hospitalizations, self-harming behavior) occurring during the course of the illness
baseline
Clinical outcome T12: Clinically significant events
Time Frame: 1 year
Record of occurrences (boolean) and dates of any clinical event (hospitalizations, self-harming behavior) occurring during the course of the illness
1 year
Patient self rating of recovery T0
Time Frame: baseline
Questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR), range from 22 to 110, higher values correspond to better recovery
baseline
Patient self rating of recovery T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR), range from 22 to 110, higher values correspond to better recovery
1 year
Patient self rating of recovery T24
Time Frame: 2 years
Questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR), range from 22 to 110, higher values correspond to better recovery
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Professional's Recovery knowledge on patients T0
Time Frame: baseline
Recovery knowledge inventory (RKI), range 20-100, higher values correspond to better knowledge on recovery processes
baseline
Professional's Recovery knowledge on patients T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Recovery knowledge inventory (RKI), range 20-100, higher values correspond to better knowledge on recovery processes
1 year
Professional's Recovery opinions on patients T0
Time Frame: baseline
Practitioners' Beliefs, Goals and Practices in Psychiatric Rehabilitation (PBGP), range 26-104, higher values correspond to better views on patients recovery
baseline
Professional's Recovery opinions on patients T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Practitioners' Beliefs, Goals and Practices in Psychiatric Rehabilitation (PBGP), range 26-104, higher values correspond to better views on patients recovery
1 year
Stigmatization T0
Time Frame: baseline
Internalized stigma of mental illness: self-stigma (ISMI), range 29-116, higher values correspond to worse stigmatization perception
baseline
Stigmatization T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Internalized stigma of mental illness: self-stigma (ISMI), range 29-116, higher values correspond to worse stigmatization perception
1 year
Perceived needs T0
Time Frame: baseline
Perceived needs scale (ELADEB), Composite measure of perceived difficulty in meeting needs and needs of help
baseline
Perceived needs T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Perceived needs scale (ELADEB), Composite measure of perceived difficulty in meeting needs and needs of help
1 year
Goal achievement T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Goal achievement scale (GAS), range -2 to +2, higher values correspond to better achievement of one specific goal
1 year
Metacognitive strategies T0
Time Frame: baseline
Versailles Metacognitive Strategies Evaluation Questionnaire (V-MSEQ), range 25-175, higher values correspond to better metacognitive strategies
baseline
Sleep T0
Time Frame: baseline
Patient self rating of sleep (1 item Pittsburgh sleep quality index PSQI), range 1-4, lower values correspond to better sleep quality
baseline
Sleep T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient self rating of sleep (1 item Pittsburgh sleep quality index PSQI), range 1-4, lower values correspond to better sleep quality
1 year
Medication adherence T0
Time Frame: baseline
Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS), range 5-25, lower values correspond to better adherence to treatment
baseline
Medication adherence T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS), range 5-25, lower values correspond to better adherence to treatment
1 year
Illness severity T0
Time Frame: baseline
Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI-S), range 1-7, higher values correspond to more severe illness
baseline
Illness severity T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI-S), range 1-7, higher values correspond to more severe illness
1 year
Cognitive disability T0
Time Frame: baseline
Cognitive processes involved in disability in schizophrenia scale (CPSD), range 0-78, higher values correspond to better cognitive functioning
baseline
Cognitive disability T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Cognitive processes involved in disability in schizophrenia scale (CPSD), range 0-78, higher values correspond to better cognitive functioning
1 year
Entourage assessment of structure recovery orientation T0
Time Frame: baseline
Recovery Self-Assessment Significant other version (RSA-R entourage), range 40-200, higher values correspond to better recovery orientation
baseline
Entourage assessment of structure recovery orientation T12
Time Frame: 1 year
Recovery Self-Assessment Significant other version (RSA-R entourage), range 40-200, higher values correspond to better recovery orientation
1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Structure recovery orientation T0
Time Frame: baseline
Recovery Self-Assessment Services (RSA-R Services), range 32-160, higher values correspond to more pronounced recovery orientation of the structure
baseline
Structure recovery orientation T24
Time Frame: 2 years
Recovery Self-Assessment Services (RSA-R Services), range 32-160, higher values correspond to more pronounced recovery orientation of the structure
2 years
Implementation fidelity T0
Time Frame: baseline
Professional ratings of Passvers fidelity scale, range 0-92, higher values correspond to better implementation
baseline
Implementation fidelity T24
Time Frame: 2 years
Professional ratings of Passvers fidelity scale, range 0-92, higher values correspond to better implementation
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christine Passerieux, Prof, CH Versailles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Bazin, N. Les suivis sociosanitaires des personnes présentant un trouble mental sévère et persistant : expérimentation PASSVers à Versailles. Inf. Psychiatr. 95, 509-513 (2019).

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P20/03_ PASSVERS-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Mental Disorder

Clinical Trials on Patient group/Passvers

Subscribe