Effects of Motivational and Instructional Self-Talk on Performance and Stress in Soccer Forwards (STF)

January 27, 2026 updated by: Yue Dou, Beijing Sport University

A Study on the Effects of Different Types of Self-Talk on Strikers in Soccer

This study investigates the effects of different types of self-talk on performance and stress regulation in soccer forwards. Self-talk is a psychological technique in which athletes use specific verbal cues to guide their thoughts and actions during training and competition. Two commonly used forms are motivational self-talk, which focuses on confidence and effort, and instructional self-talk, which focuses on technical and tactical cues.

Thirty-six male soccer forwards of different competitive levels participated in this study. Players were randomly assigned to a motivational self-talk group, an instructional self-talk group, or a control group. The intervention lasted six weeks. Before and after the intervention, participants completed assessments of soccer-specific technical skills, physical performance, and match tactical behavior. Psychological measures of self-efficacy and biological indicators of stress (salivary cortisol) were also collected.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether different self-talk strategies produce different effects depending on players' competitive level and task demands. The findings are expected to provide practical guidance for the use of psychological training strategies in soccer and other team sports.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
        • Beijing Sport University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male university football players aged 18-25 years
  • Full-time university students regularly engaged in organized football training and competition
  • At least two years of systematic football training experience
  • In good general health at the time of enrollment
  • No musculoskeletal injuries or medical conditions affecting football performance within the previous 6 months
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and hearing
  • Able to understand study procedures and complete soccer-specific performance and decision-making tasks
  • Provided written informed consent prior to participation

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of neurological, psychiatric, or cognitive disorders that could influence decision-making or reaction time
  • Current participation in structured psychological skills training programs (e.g., self-talk training, imagery, mindfulness training) outside routine football practice during the study period
  • Use of medications or substances known to affect cognitive function
  • Presence of any medical condition or injury contraindicating participation in football training or testing
  • Failure to comply with the intervention protocol or outcome assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational Self-Talk
Participants in this group received a motivational self-talk intervention designed to enhance confidence, effort, and persistence during soccer training and competition.
Participants received structured motivational self-talk training aimed at enhancing confidence, effort, and persistence during soccer training and match-related tasks. Individualized motivational cue words and phrases were developed and practiced under guidance, and participants were instructed to apply these cues consistently throughout the six-week intervention period.
Experimental: Instructional Self-Talk
Participants in this group received an instructional self-talk intervention focusing on technical execution and tactical decision-making during soccer activities.
Participants were instructed to apply task-specific instructional self-talk cues to guide technical execution and tactical decision-making during soccer training over a six-week intervention period.
Experimental: Control
Participants in the control group continued their regular soccer training without receiving any structured self-talk intervention.
Participants in the control group continued their regular soccer training and match preparation without receiving any form of structured self-talk instruction. No motivational or instructional self-talk strategies were introduced during the intervention period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Match-Based Technical and Tactical Performance
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Match-based technical and tactical performance was assessed during regular soccer match play using standardized match analysis procedures. This outcome represents players' overall technical and tactical performance exhibited in a real match context over the intervention period.
Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shooting Accuracy
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Shooting accuracy was evaluated using a standardized soccer shooting test. Participants performed a series of shots toward predefined target zones within the goal. Shooting accuracy was calculated as the percentage of successful shots directed into the target areas, with higher percentages indicating better shooting performance.
Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Sport Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Sport self-efficacy was assessed using the Sport Self-Efficacy Scale, a validated self-report questionnaire designed to measure individuals' perceived confidence in performing sport-related skills and tasks. The scale consists of multiple items rated on a Likert-type scale, yielding a total score ranging from 10 to 50, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived self-efficacy in sport performance contexts.
Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Dribbling Run Performance
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Dribbling run performance was assessed using a standardized soccer dribbling run test. Participants completed the task while controlling the ball along a predefined running course, and performance was quantified as total completion time (seconds) recorded under standardized testing conditions.
Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Loughborough Soccer Passing Test Performance
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Passing performance was assessed using the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT), a standardized and widely used soccer-specific passing assessment. Participants were required to complete a series of prescribed passing and ball-control actions according to the standardized test protocol. Performance was quantified as the total time (seconds) required to complete the test under controlled testing conditions.
Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Salivary Cortisol Concentration
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention
Salivary cortisol concentration was assessed as an index of physiological stress response. Saliva samples were collected using standardized saliva collection procedures and cortisol levels were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods under controlled laboratory conditions.
Baseline and immediately after the 6-week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 7, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be shared due to participant confidentiality and institutional data protection policies.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Self-talk Interventions in Soccer Performance

Clinical Trials on Motivational Self-Talk Training

Subscribe