Self-Distancing for Specific Phobia in Youth

May 4, 2026 updated by: Columbia University

Targeting Approach Behaviors in Exposures With Self-distancing to Improve Outcomes in Youth Specific Phobia

Self-Distancing is a cognitive technique that involves a shift in self-talk characterized by replacing first-person (e.g., "I") with second- or third-person pronouns (i.e., "you", one's own name) to promote an adaptive, self-reflective stance in emotionally charged situations. This trial aims to help learn how self-distancing may increase behavioral approach during exposures. To find out if self-distancing works by helping children approach fear-inducing stimuli, the study will look at behaviors and physiological responses related to approach, as well as symptom severity, before and after this cognitive technique.

The study hypothesizes that Self-Distancing will lead to greater increases in approach behaviors and a larger decrease in symptom severity compared to a control condition (first-person self-talk).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Anxiety disorders impact 1 in 3 youths by the time of adolescence, and can lead to depression, substance use, school issues, and suicide risk. Specific phobia is the earliest occurring and most common anxiety disorder and increases risk for later onset of other anxiety disorders (e.g., separation, social, generalized anxiety disorders), OCD, depression, and substance abuse problems. Exposure therapy is the standard treatment for specific phobia, but many still struggle with symptoms even after treatment. For exposure therapy to be effective, youth with specific phobia must actively approach feared situations to learn that feared outcomes do not occur. Therefore, strategies to facilitate approach behaviors during exposure therapy may improve treatment outcomes.

Self-distancing (SD) is a technique that may help youths approach their fears in exposure therapy. SD utilizes second or third-person language to enhance a person's psychological distance from self, helping them to "take a step back" from emotional situations and adopt a more objective perspective. In community samples, SD has been found to boost determination and persistence during difficult tasks, including those that induce anxiety (e.g., giving a speech). However, SD has yet to be tested as a strategy for helping clinically anxious youth engage with exposures. Additionally, objective measures of approach are needed for measuring and modifying novel exposure therapy augmentation strategies, such as SD, to improve treatment outcomes.

This study will examine if SD increases the ability to approach feared stimuli during a behavioral approach test (BAT). 20 youth (7-12.99 years) with specific phobia of spiders will be randomized to either a SD or a control condition. In the SD condition, participants will engage with the exposure task (BAT) from a self-distanced view (e.g., "Emily will touch a spider"), while in the control condition the subject will use first-person perspective (e.g., "I will touch a spider") Before and after the exposure therapy session, a BAT will be applied. This study will assess: 1) Approach -indexed using both behavioral (ability to get physically closer to spider, and video-derived motion analysis) and neuro-physiological (i.e., electroencephalogram [EEG], heart rate [HR], heart rate variability [HRV] and electrodermal activity [EDA]) metrics, collected during a BAT and 2) severity of specific phobia using validated self-report scales. During SD or control intervention, continuous audio and video data will be collected to derive behavioral metrics of engagement with the intervention (i.e., video-derived motion analysis and audio-derived linguistic metrics) and participants will be asked to subjectively rate their distress and engagement with the activity. Data will be analyzed to determine whether SD improves behavioral, neural, and physiological markers of approach to feared stimuli in youth with specific phobia and reduces symptom severity, and to explore the degree to which changes in video and audio-derived objective metrics of behavioral engagement with the intervention associate with changes in subjective ratings of fear/distress, subjective self-report of engagement and symptom severity.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10019
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 7-12.99 years at the time of consent
  • Written informed consent by a parent/legal guardian and assent by the child
  • Clinically significant symptoms of specific phobia (i.e., spider phobia)
  • Fluent in English (Participant may be bilingual but must be able to speak and understand fluent English to participate in the study)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior diagnosis of bipolar disorder
  • Prior diagnosis of psychotic disorders
  • Prior diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder
  • Active alcohol or substance dependence
  • Active suicidal ideation or suicidal behavior within the past 3 months prior to baseline assessment
  • Any major medical or neurological problem (e.g., unstable hypertension, seizure disorder, head trauma)
  • Any history of cognitive impairment or developmental delay

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Self-Distancing
Youth will be randomized to a BAT with Self-Distancing Intervention. In this arm, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-distanced perspective (e.g., "Emily is going to touch the spider").
In the Self Distancing Intervention condition, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-distanced perspective (e.g., "Emily is going to touch the spider").
Active Comparator: First-person self-talk
Youth will be randomized to a BAT with a control condition. In this arm, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-immersed perspective (e.g.,"I'm going to touch the spider")
Youth will be randomized to a BAT with a control condition. In this arm, participants will be instructed to describe the exposure task from a self-immersed perspective (e.g., "I'm going to touch the spider")

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral Approach Test (BAT)
Time Frame: Immediately before and after intervention.
The BAT will be utilized to evaluate participants' behavioral approach towards a spider before and after the exposure therapy session. Participants will be instructed to approach a spider, contained in a plastic container at the opposite end of the room, as quickly and closely as they can manage, stopping when their fear becomes overwhelming. The BAT outcomes will be assessed by the distance approached (marked on the floor), ranging from 0, where participants will refuse to enter the room or to move from the starting point- to 10 feet, where they will touch the spider with a fingertip.
Immediately before and after intervention.
Spider Phobia Questionnaire (SPQ-C)
Time Frame: At baseline (~1 week before the intervention) and immediately after the intervention.
The SPQ-C is a validated self-report assessment of spider fear for children 8-12 years, consisting of 29 true/false items, 8 of which are reversed-scored. Total scores range from 0 to 29. Higher scores indicate a greater degree of spider fear.
At baseline (~1 week before the intervention) and immediately after the intervention.
Treatment Engagement and Adherence Ratings (TEARS)
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention.
The TEARS is a brief questionnaire assessing youth and therapist reports of youth's adherence to their assigned exposure condition, and their approach toward the exposure. Adherence and engagement are rated on a Likert scale from 1-7, with higher scores indicating greater engagement and adherence.
Immediately after the intervention.
Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS)
Time Frame: Immediately before and after the intervention.
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs) scale-a self-assessment tool that quantifies the intensity of an individual's distress. During BAT, participants will be asked to indicate their level of anxiety on a scale ranging from 0 "no distress" to 100 "extreme distress".
Immediately before and after the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: Immediately before and after the intervention.
HRV is a widely recognized indicator of the autonomic nervous system's regulation of the heart, reflecting the body's capacity to adapt to stress and relaxation. HRV has been extensively used in clinical and physiological research to assess cardiovascular function and autonomic engagement.
Immediately before and after the intervention.
Electrodermal activity
Time Frame: Immediately before and after the intervention.
Electrodermal activity (EDA) refers to the changes in the skin's ability to conduct electricity, which is influenced by the activity of the sweat glands. These changes are primarily driven by the sympathetic nervous system, which is activated in response to emotional and physiological arousal. Meta-analyses research suggest that anxious and non-anxious individuals differ in their EDA-estimated fear conditioned responses.
Immediately before and after the intervention.
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Time Frame: Immediately before and after the intervention.
EEG has become a valuable tool for understanding the neural mechanisms underlying anxiety and phobia, offering high temporal resolution to capture rapid neural responses to fear-related stimuli. Research indicates that increased beta and gamma band activity during exposure to feared stimuli is associated with heightened arousal and fear responses in individuals with specific phobias, while reductions in alpha power are linked to increased anxiety. This outcome will measure the changes in these frequency bands before and after the intervention and compare them with the control condition.
Immediately before and after the intervention.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED)- Parent and Child
Time Frame: At baseline (~1 week before intervention) and immediately after intervention.
The SCARED is a 41-item measure with parallel forms for youth and caregivers, assessing five domains of anxiety: panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and school avoidance. It is a well-validated tool with strong psychometric support. Items are rated on a 3-point scale (0 = Not true or hardly ever true, 1 = Somewhat true or sometimes true, 2 = Very true or often true), with total scores ranging from 0 to 82, where higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity.
At baseline (~1 week before intervention) and immediately after intervention.
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Time Frame: This measure is completed by the child's caregiver at baseline (~1 week before the intervention).
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a widely used parent-report measure that assesses emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents (ages 6-18). It consists of 113 items, rated on a 3-point scale (0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true, 2 = very true), with total scores ranging from 0 to 226. Scores are standardized into T-scores, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
This measure is completed by the child's caregiver at baseline (~1 week before the intervention).
Clinical Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)
Time Frame: It will be applied immediately before the intervention.
The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) is a validated scale for measuring treatment expectancy and rationale credibility for use in clinical outcome studies. It consists of six items, with credibility items scored from 1 to 9 (range: 3-27) and expectancy items scored from 0% to 100% (range: 0-300%). Scores are typically standardized and analyzed separately for each factor.
It will be applied immediately before the intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kate D Fitzgerald, MD, Professor of Psychiatry

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAAU7985

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Specific Phobias

Clinical Trials on Self-Distancing Intervention

Subscribe