Rural Dementia Caregiver Project

November 14, 2023 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Small-Group Self-Management Workshop for Rural Caregivers of Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

These caregivers are a vulnerable group due to their physical isolation and well-documented rural disparities in health care access and quality. Many rural dementia caregivers experience serious health consequences due to caregiving responsibilities that can limit their ability to maintain their caregiving role. Thus, there is a pressing need for effective, scalable, and accessible programs to support rural dementia caregivers.

Online programs offer a convenient and readily translatable option for program delivery because they can be accessed by caregivers in the home and at the convenience of the user. Building Better Caregivers is an online 6-week, interactive, small-group self-management, social support, and skills-building workshop developed for caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia.

The investigators will conduct a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial that will enroll and randomize 640 rural dementia caregivers into two groups: the intervention (workshop) group and the attention control group. Caregivers will be recruited throughout the United States. Primary outcomes will be caregiver stress and depression symptoms. The investigators hypothesize that stress scores and depression symptoms will be significantly improved at 12 months in the intervention group versus control group. The investigators will also identify key strengths (facilitators) and weaknesses (barriers) of workshop implementation. The investigators will use the RE-AIM implementation framework and a mixed methods approach to identify implementation characteristics pertinent to both caregivers and rural community organizations.

If the Building Better Caregivers workshop is proven to be effective, this research has the potential to open new research horizons, particularly on how to reach and effectively support isolated dementia caregivers in rural areas with an intervention that is scalable, even in low-resourced settings. If the workshop can achieve its goals with rural dementia caregivers, some of those most isolated, it would also be expected to be scalable in other low-resourced settings (e.g., in urban or suburban environments).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

418

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94118
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Caring for person with dementia
  • Able to read and write in English
  • Able to access the internet
  • Providing care for ≥ 10 hours per week
  • Reporting a minimum stress level of 4 or more on a 10-point scale
  • Living in rural area of United States (self-identify or zip code is a Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes (RUCA) defined rural area)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have an anticipated inability to complete the 12-month follow-up (e.g., planned travel)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Building Better Caregivers Workshop Group
Building Better Caregivers Workshop is a 6-week online self-management and skills building workshop. Participants receive the online workshop as soon as possible after randomization.
Workshops consist of small group or about 20-25 persons. Two peer co-facilitators (caregiver themselves) will guide workshop activities. Participants will receive a workshop booklet. Each week, participants will log on at least 2-3 times for a total time of approximately two hours. Participants do not require "real time" attendance at pre-determined times.
Active Comparator: Attention Control Group
Participants will be offered the online workshop after the 12 month trial is completed if they so desire.
Participants will receive two brief 15-30 minutes phone calls by study staff, and will receive a handbook on dementia and caregiver resources while they wait for the workshop.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in visual numeric stress scale score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
A visual numeric stress scale. The scale score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in Personal Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-8) scale score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
Personal Health Questionnaire Depression (PHQ-8) scale. The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Short Caregiver Self-Efficacy scale score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
Short Caregiver Self-Efficacy scale (8-items). The scale scores is calculated by taking the mean of the items to produce a total score between 1 and 10, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12) scale score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
Short form of the Zarit Burden Interview-12 (ZBI-12) scale (12-items). The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in caregiver self-rated general health score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure SF-1 self-rated general health single item. The scale score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in person with dementia general health score as reported by caregiver from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure SF-1 caregiver-reported general health single item. The scale score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in UCLA loneliness scale score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
UCLA loneliness scale (3-items). The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 3 and 9, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in Lubben Social isolation scale score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
Lubben Social isolation scale (6-items). The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 30, with lower scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in caregiver health care utilization from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
3-items measuring overnight hospitalizations, nursing home or other long-term care facility use, and hospital emergency room visits from the Health and Retirement Study, modified time frame from self-report for past 12 months to self-report for past 6 months; scored as single items; with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in person with dementia health care utilization as reported by caregiver from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
3-items measuring overnight hospitalizations, nursing home or other long-term care facility use, and hospital emergency room visits from the Health and Retirement Study, modified time frame from caregiver report for past 12 months to caregiver report for past 6 months; scored as single items; with higher scores indicating worse outcome.
Baseline and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in caregiver benefits scale score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
4-items measuring potential benefits of caregiving (e.g., providing care made caregiver feel useful, closer to care partner, good about self, and allowed caregiver to learn new skills) from the Health and Retirement Study. The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 4, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Baseline and 12 months
Change in exercise behavior scale score from baseline to 12 months
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months
6-items measuring exercise behaviors. Exercise behaviors include stretching/strengthening; walking; swimming/aquatic; bicycling (including stationary bikes); other aerobic exercise equipment (stairmaster, rowing, etc.); or other aerobic exercise. The scale score is calculated by summing each item to produce a total score between 0 and 1080, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Baseline and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Veronica Yank, MD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data to be shared will be individual participant data that underlie the results reported in published article(s), after deidentification (e.g., text, tables, figures, and appendices). The additional and related documents that will be available are study protocol and data dictionary. The data will become available beginning within 3 months of article publication and ending 5 years following article publication.The access criteria for the data to be shared will include researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal in order to achieve aims in the approved proposal including performance of meta-analysis of individual participant data. Proposals should be directed to veronica.yank@ucsf.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data will be available for 5 years at a third party website (Link to be included later).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will become available beginning within 3 months of article publication and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The access criteria for the data to be shared will include researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal in order to achieve aims in the approved proposal including performance of meta-analysis of individual participant data. Proposals should be directed to veronica.yank@ucsf.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data will be available for 5 years at a third party website (Link to be included later).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Building Better Caregivers Workshop

3
Subscribe