Losartan for Corneal Fibrosis

May 4, 2026 updated by: Karim Mohamed-Noriega, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Topical Losartan as Treatment to Reduce Corneal Scarring Fibrosis

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical losartan in improving visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and reducing corneal densitometry, corneal aberrations and corneal scarring severity in adult patients with corneal scars of different etiologies. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either topical losartan 0.8 mg/mL or placebo eyedrops 6 times per day for six months.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Corneal scarring is a significant cause of visual impairment worldwide, with limited conservative treatment options. Corticosteroids are commonly used but are associated with important adverse effects. Losartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, has demonstrated antifibrotic effects through inhibition of TGF-β signaling in experimental studies.

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topical losartan in improving visual function and corneal transparency in patients with corneal scarring fibrosis. Outcomes include changes in best-corrected visual acuity measured using the ETDRS chart, contrast sensitivity with FACT chart, corneal scar area calculated with ImageJ, corneal density assessed by Scheimpflug corneal densitometry, corneal aberrations using Zernike Analysis and clinical corneal scar severity evaluated using slit-lamp biomicroscopy with Fantes haze grading, compared with placebo. A total of 46 adult patients with stable corneal scars will be enrolled and followed for six months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Nueo Leon
      • Monterrey, Nueo Leon, Mexico, 64460
        • Recruiting
        • Ophthalmology Department
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

  • Inclusion Criteria:

    • Adults aged 18 years or older
    • Presence of corneal scar with a duration of at least 1 month
    • Corneal scars of any etiology
    • Corneal scars with or without corneal neovascularization
    • Stable corneal scar without epithelial defect
    • No active treatment for the underlying condition for at least 1 month
  • Exclusion Criteria:

    • Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
    • Presence of corneal epithelial defect or friable epithelium
    • Age under 18 years
    • Pregnancy
    • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to losartan

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Topical losartan
Drug: Topical Losartan 0.8 mg/ml ophthalmic Solution, one drop applied six times daily for six months
Drug: Topical Losartan 0.8 mg/ml ophthalmic solution, one drop applied six times daily for six months.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Drug: Balanced saline solution ophthalmic drops, one drop applied six times daily for six months.
Drug: Balanced saline solution ophthalmic drops, one drop applied six times daily for six months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
BCVA measured using ETDRS chart and reported in LogMAR units.
Baseline to 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
Contrast sensitivity will be evaluated using FACT chart.
Baseline to 6 months.
Change in Corneal Haze Severity
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.

Corneal haze will be assessed using the Fantes Corneal Haze Grading Scale, evaluated by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. The scale ranges from 0 to 4.

Grade 0: Clear with no opacity seen by any method of microscopic slit-lamp examination.

Grade 0.5: Trace or faint haze seen only by indirect, broad tangential illumination.

Grade 1: Haze of minimal density seen with difficulty with direct or diffuse examination.

Grade 2: Mild haze easily visible with direct focal slit-lamp illumination. Grade 3: Moderate opacity that partially obscures details of the iris. Grade 4: Severe opacity that completely obscures the details of intraocular structures.

The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 4. Higher scores indicate greater corneal opacity and worse clinical outcome.

Baseline to 6 months.
Change in Corneal Scar Density
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Corneal scar density will be quantitatively measured using Scheimpflug corneal tomography corneal densitometry and reported in grayscale units (GSU).
Baseline to 6 months
Change in Corneal Scar Area
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
The area of corneal scarring will be measured using slit-lamp corneal photography and analyzed with Image J software, reported in square millimeters (mm²).
Baseline to 6 months.
Change in corneal aberrations
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
Corneal scar density will be quantitatively measured using Scheimpflug corneal tomography corneal Zernike Analysis reported micron.
Baseline to 6 months.
Change in Intraocular Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
Intraocular pressure will be measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry to monitor ocular safety.
Baseline to 6 months.
Change in corneal pachymetry
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
Corneal pachymetry will be measeured using optical coherence tomography.
Baseline to 6 months.
Corneal scar depth
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
Corneal scar depth will be evaluated using optical coherence tomography line scan.
Baseline to 6 months.
Treatment Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
Treatment adverse events will be assessed based on patient-reported ocular discomfort and recorded adverse events during follow-up visits.
Baseline to 6 months.
Treatment Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months.
Treatment adherence will be assessed based on daily patient adherence report.
Baseline to 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karim Mohamed-Noriega, Dr. med., Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • COZAAR® (losartan potassium) tablets, for oral use Initial U.S. Approval: 1995 . FDA
  • PLM. (n.d.). COZAAR - Comprimidos. Medicamentos PLM. Recuperado el 9 de febrero de 2025, de https://www.medicamentosplm.com/Home/productos/cozaar.comprimidos/128/101/77344/25
  • 49. Mauer, M., Zinman, B., Gardiner, R., Suissa, S., Sinaiko, A., Strand, T., Drummond, K., Donnelly, S., Goodyer, P., Gubler, M. C., & Klein, R. (2009). Renal and Retinal Effects of Enalapril and Losartan in Type 1 Diabetes A BS TR AC T. In N Engl J Med (Vol. 361).
  • 48. Burnier M, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Clinical pharmacology of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan potassium in healthy subjects. J Hypertens Suppl. 1995 Jul;13(1):S23-8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199507001-00003. PMID: 18800452.
  • Zandbergen, A. A. M., Marinus, ;, Baggen, G. A., Steven, ;, Lamberts, W. J., Bootsma, A. H., Dick De Zeeuw, ;, & Ouwendijk, R. J. T. (2003). Effect of Losartan on Microalbuminuria in Normotensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus A Randomized Clinical Trial Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have. www.annals.org
  • 46. Kubba S, Agarwal SK, Prakash A, Puri V, Babbar R, Anuradha S. Effect of losartan on albuminuria, peripheral and autonomic neuropathy in normotensive microalbuminuric type 2 diabetics. Neurol India. 2003 Sep;51(3):355-8. PMID: 14652437.
  • 45. Pucker AD, Frogozo M, Malooley MM, Harthan JS. Point-Counter Point: Treating Corneal Haze with 0.8 mg/mL Topical Losartan. Clinical Insights in Eyecare. 2024;2(5).
  • 44. Rodgers EG, Al-Mohtaseb Z, Chen AJ. Topical Losartan for Treating Corneal Haze After Ultraviolet-A/Riboflavin Collagen Cross-Linking. Cornea. 2024 Sep 1;43(9):1165-1170. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003527. Epub 2024 Mar 22. PMID: 38573840.
  • 43. Sampaio, L. P., Hilgert, G. S. L., Shiju, T. M., Murillo, S. E., Santhiago, M. R., & Wilson, S. E. (2022). Topical losartan inhibits corneal scarring fibrosis and collagen type IV deposition after Descemet's membrane-endothelial excision in rabbits. Experimental Eye Research, 216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2022.108940
  • 42. Sampaio, L. P., Villabona-Martinez, V., Shiju, T. M., Santhiago, M. R., & Wilson, S. E. (2023). Topical Losartan Decreases Myofibroblast Generation But Not Corneal Opacity After Surface Blast-Simulating Irregular PTK in Rabbits. Translational Vision Science and Technology, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.9.20
  • 41. Sampaio, L. P., Hilgert, G. S. L., Shiju, T. M., Santhiago, M. R., & Wilson, S. E. (2022). Losartan Inhibition of Myofibroblast Generation and Late Haze (Scarring Fibrosis) After PRK in Rabbits. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 38(12), 820-829. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20221026-03
  • 40. Sampaio, L. P., Hilgert, G. S. L., Shiju, T. M., Santhiago, M. R., & Wilson, S. E. (2022). Topical Losartan and Corticosteroid Additively Inhibit Corneal Stromal Myofibroblast Generation and Scarring Fibrosis After Alkali Burn Injury. Translational Vision Science and Technology, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.7.9
  • 39. Brooke BS, Habashi JP, Judge DP, Patel N, Loeys B, Dietz HC 3rd. Angiotensin II blockade and aortic-root dilation in Marfan's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 26;358(26):2787-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706585. PMID: 18579813; PMCID: PMC2692965.
  • 38. Rosenkranz, S. (2004). TGF-β1 and angiotensin networking in cardiac remodeling. In Cardiovascular Research (Vol. 63, Issue 3, pp. 423-432). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.04.030
  • 37. Gu, L., Zhu, Y., Lee, M., Nguyen, A., Ryujin, N. T., Huang, J. Y., Pandit, S. K., Chamseddine, S., Xiao, L., Mohamed, Y. I., Kaseb, A. O., Karin, M., & Shalapour, S. (2023). Angiotensin II receptor inhibition ameliorates liver fibrosis and enhances hepatocellular carcinoma infiltration by effector T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(19). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2300706120
  • 36. Junaid, A., Hostetter, T. H., & Rosenbergt, M. E. (n.d.). Interaction of Angiotensin II and TGF-J31 in the Rat Remnant Kidney. http://journals.lww.com/jasn
  • 35. Marcin Dobaczewski, Wei Chen, Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis, Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling in cardiac remodeling, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Volume 51, Issue 4, 2011,
  • 34. Chen, X., Lu, H., Rateri, D. L., Cassis, L. A., & Daugherty, A. (2013). Conundrum of angiotensin II and TGF-β interactions in aortic aneurysms. In Current Opinion in Pharmacology (Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 180-185). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2013.01.002
  • 33. Murphy, A. M., Wong, A. L., & Bezuhly, M. (2015). Modulation of angiotensin II signaling in the prevention of fibrosis. In Fibrogenesis and Tissue Repair (Vol. 8, Issue 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13069-015-0023-z
  • 32. Marcin Dobaczewski, Wei Chen, Nikolaos G. Frangogiannis, Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling in cardiac remodeling, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Volume 51, Issue 4, 2011,
  • 31. Chen, X., Lu, H., Rateri, D. L., Cassis, L. A., & Daugherty, A. (2013). Conundrum of angiotensin II and TGF-β interactions in aortic aneurysms. In Current Opinion in Pharmacology (Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 180-185). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2013.01.002
  • 30. Murphy, A. M., Wong, A. L., & Bezuhly, M. (2015). Modulation of angiotensin II signaling in the prevention of fibrosis. In Fibrogenesis and Tissue Repair (Vol. 8, Issue 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13069-015-0023-z
  • 29. Wilson, S. E. (2023). Topical Losartan: Practical Guidance for Clinical Trials in the Prevention and Treatment of Corneal Scarring Fibrosis and Other Eye Diseases and Disorders. In Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Vol. 39, Issue 3, pp. 191-206). Mary Ann Liebert Inc. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2022.0174
  • 28. Pereira-Souza, A. L., Ambrósio, R., Bandeira, F., Salomão, M. Q., Lima, A. S., & Wilson, S. E. (2022). Topical Losartan for Treating Corneal Fibrosis (Haze): First Clinical Experience. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 38(11), 741-746. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20221018-02
  • 27. Chung, J.-H., Kang, Y.-G., Kim, H.-J., Chung, J.-H., Kang, Y.-G., & Kim, H.-J. (1998). Effect of 0.1% dexamethasone on epithelial healing in experimental corneal alkali wounds: morphological changes during the repair process. In Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (Vol. 236). Springer-Verlag.
  • 26. Mifflin, M. D., Betts, B. S., Frederick, P. A., Feuerman, J. M., Fenzl, C. R., Moshirfar, M., & Zaugg, B. (2017). Efficacy and safety of a 3-month loteprednol etabonate 0.5% gel taper for routine prophylaxis after photorefractive keratectomy compared to a 3-month prednisolone acetate 1% and fluorometholone 0.1% taper. Clinical Ophthalmology, 11, 1113-1118. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S138272
  • 25. Srinivasan, M., Mascarenhas, J., Rajaraman, R., Ravindran, M., Lalitha, P., O'Brien, K. S., Glidden, D. v., Ray, K. J., Oldenburg, C. E., Zegans, M. E., Whitcher, J. P., McLeod, S. D., Porco, T. C., Lietman, T. M., & Acharya, N. R. (2014). The steroids for corneal ulcers trial (SCUT): Secondary 12-month clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 157(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.025
  • 24. Fung, A. T., Tran, T., Lim, L. L., Samarawickrama, C., Arnold, J., Gillies, M., Catt, C., Mitchell, L., Symons, A., Buttery, R., Cottee, L., Tumuluri, K., & Beaumont, P. (2020). Local delivery of corticosteroids in clinical ophthalmology: A review. In Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (Vol. 48, Issue 3, pp. 366-401). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13702
  • 23. Mishima, H., Nishida, T., & Otori, T. (n.d.). Dexamethasone Inhibition of Phagocytosis by Corneal Keratocytes in Culture. http://archopht.jamanetwork.com/
  • 22. Zhang, T., Wang, X. F., Wang, Z. C., Lou, D., Fang, Q. Q., Hu, Y. Y., Zhao, W. Y., Zhang, L. Y., Wu, L. H., & Tan, W. Q. (2020). Current potential therapeutic strategies targeting the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway to attenuate keloid and hypertrophic scar formation. In Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy (Vol. 129). Elsevier Masson s.r.l. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110287
  • 21. Liu, W., Wang, D. R., & Cao, Y. L. (2004). TGF-β: A Fibrotic Factor in Wound Scarring and a Potential Target for Anti-Scarring Gene Therapy. In Current Gene Therapy (Vol. 4).
  • 20. Liu, Y., Li, Y., Li, N. et al. TGF-β1 promotes scar fibroblasts proliferation and transdifferentiation via up-regulating MicroRNA-21. Sci Rep 6, 32231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32231
  • 19. Chen, X., Lu, H., Rateri, D. L., Cassis, L. A., & Daugherty, A. (2013). Conundrum of angiotensin II and TGF-β interactions in aortic aneurysms. In Current Opinion in Pharmacology (Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 180-185). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2013.01.002
  • 18. Sampaio, L. P., Martinez, V. V., Shiju, T. M., Hilgert, G. S. L., Santhiago, M. R., & Wilson, S. E. (2023). Cell Biology of Spontaneous Persistent Epithelial Defects After Photorefractive Keratectomy in Rabbits. Translational Vision Science and Technology, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.5.15
  • 17. Jester, J. v., & Ho-Chang, J. (2003). Modulation of cultured corneal keratocyte phenotype by growth factors/cytokines control in vitro contractility and extracellular matrix contraction. Experimental Eye Research, 77(5), 581-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4835(03)00188-X
  • 16. de Oliveira, R. C., & Wilson, S. E. (2020). Fibrocytes, wound healing, and corneal fibrosis. In Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Vol. 61, Issue 2). Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.2.28
  • 15. Wilson, S. E. (2021). TGF beta -1, -2 and -3 in the modulation of fibrosis in the cornea and other organs. In Experimental Eye Research (Vol. 207). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2021.108594
  • 14. Hong JW, Liu JJ, Lee JS, et al. Proinflammatory chemokine induction in keratocytes and inflammatory cell infiltration into the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2795-2803.
  • 13. Kwok, S. S., Shih, K. C., Bu, Y., Lo, A. C. Y., Chan, T. C. Y., Lai, J. S. M., Jhanji, V., & Tong, L. (2019). Systematic Review on Therapeutic Strategies to Minimize Corneal Stromal Scarring after Injury. In Eye and Contact Lens (Vol. 45, Issue 6, pp. 347-355). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000584
  • 12. Wilson, S. E. (2023). The corneal fibroblast: The Dr. Jekyll underappreciated overseer of the responses to stromal injury. Ocular Surface, 29, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.012
  • 11. de Oliveira, R. C., Tye, G., Sampaio, L. P., Shiju, T. M., DeDreu, J. R., Menko, A. S., Santhiago, M. R., & Wilson, S. E. (2021). TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 proteins in corneas with and without stromal fibrosis: Delayed regeneration of apical epithelial growth factor barrier and the epithelial basement membrane in corneas with stromal fibrosis. Experimental Eye Research, 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2020.108325 13
  • 10. Wilson, S. E., Sampaio, L. P., Shiju, T. M., Hilgert, G. S. L., & de Oliveira, R. C. (2022). Corneal Opacity: Cell Biological Determinants of the Transition From Transparency to Transient Haze to Scarring Fibrosis, and Resolution, After Injury. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.1.22
  • 9. Flaxman, S. R., Bourne, R. R. A., Resnikoff, S., Ackland, P., Braithwaite, T., Cicinelli, M. v., Das, A., Jonas, J. B., Keeffe, J., Kempen, J., Leasher, J., Limburg, H., Naidoo, K., Pesudovs, K., Silvester, A., Stevens, G. A., Tahhan, N., Wong, T., Taylor, H., … Zheng, Y. (2017). Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 5(12), e1221-e1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5
  • 8. Wang, E. Y., Kong, X., Wolle, M., Gasquet, N., Ssekasanvu, J., Mariotti, S. P., Bourne, R., Taylor, H., Resnikoff, S., & West, S. (2023). Global Trends in Blindness and Vision Impairment Resulting from Corneal Opacity 1984-2020: A Meta-analysis. In Ophthalmology (Vol. 130, Issue 8, pp. 863-871). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.03.012
  • 7. Wilson, S. E. (2023). The Cornea: No Difference in the Wound Healing Response to Injury Related to Whether, or Not, There's a Bowman's Layer. In Biomolecules (Vol. 13, Issue 5). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13050771
  • Yam, G. H. F., Riau, A. K., Funderburgh, M. L., Mehta, J. S., & Jhanji, V. (2020). Keratocyte biology. In Experimental Eye Research (Vol. 196). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2020.108062
  • 5. Wilson, S. E., Sampaio, L. P., Shiju, T. M., Hilgert, G. S. L., & de Oliveira, R. C. (2022). Corneal Opacity: Cell Biological Determinants of the Transition From Transparency to Transient Haze to Scarring Fibrosis, and Resolution, After Injury. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.63.1.22
  • 4. Oyster, C. W. (2006). The human eye: Structure and function (2006a ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • 3. Sridhar, M. S. (2018). Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface. In Indian Journal of Ophthalmology (Vol. 66, Issue 2, pp. 190-194). Medknow Publications. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_646_17
  • 2. Weisenthal, R. W. (2023b). 2023-2024 basic and clinical science courseTM, section 8: External disease and cornea. American Academy of Ophthalmology.
  • 1. Meek, K. M., Knupp, C., Lewis, P. N., Morgan, S. R., & Hayes, S. (2024). Structural control of corneal transparency, refractive power and dynamics. In Eye (Basingstoke). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-02969-7

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 11, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Corneal Scarring Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Topical losartan

Subscribe