Safety and Efficacy Study of EXC 001 to Improve the Appearance of Scars From Prior Breast Surgery

August 12, 2021 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, WITHIN-SUBJECT CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VARIOUS DOSES AND REGIMENS OF EXC 001 FOR THE AMELIORATION OF SCARRING FOLLOWING REVISION OF SCARS FROM PRIOR BREAST SURGERY IN ADULT SUBJECTS (LEGACY EXCALIARD PROTOCOL # EXC 001-204)

The study will investigate the efficacy of various doses and regimens of EXC 001 in reducing skin scarring in subjects undergoing revision of scars from prior surgery. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of EXC 001 and placebo.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

68

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91105
        • Skin Deep Laser Medical Spa
      • Whittier, California, United States, 90602
        • Bright Health Physicans Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
    • Florida
      • Lake Worth, Florida, United States, 33461
        • Altus Research
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33133
        • Bayside Ambulatory Center
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33146
        • Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Miami
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
        • Body Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
    • New Jersey
      • Montclair, New Jersey, United States, 07042
        • New Jersey Plastic Surgery
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Mark L. Jewell,MD Surgery Center
      • Tualatin, Oregon, United States, 97062
        • Connall Consmetic Surgery
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Endeavor Clinical Trials,P.A.
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78240-1670
        • Texas Plastic Surgery
    • Washington
      • Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States, 98043
        • BAXTER Plastic Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have previous had breast surgery resulting in unacceptable scars.
  • Subject has chosen to have breast scars revised.
  • Subject must not be pregnant or lactating.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant or pregnant during the 6 months, prior to inclusion in the study or lactating.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to the start of the study.
  • Any other condition or prior therapy, which, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject unsuitable for the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group 1
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group 2
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group 3
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group 4
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Physician assessment of scar was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores, except the overall opinion score, and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 11, 18
Physician observer scar assessment score was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for a scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores except the overall opinion score and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.
Week 11, 18
Expert Panel Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 11, 18, 24
Scar assessment by an expert panel was done on blinded photographs using 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS) where a score of 0 = best possible scar and a score of 100 = worst possible scar, where lower scores indicated better outcome. The rater first marked a rating for the "worse" scar and then rated the other scar. The difference between these two ratings was the "improvement of scar severity." If there was no difference, the expert could check a box to indicate that determination. This method provided information on the absolute severity of the scars as well as the differences between the two scars in the pair.
Week 11, 18, 24
Subject Observer Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 24
Participants rated pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion of scar on 10-point scale. For pain and itching associated with scar: range = 1 (no, not at all) to 10 (yes, worst imaginable) and for other parameters associated with scar compared to normal skin: range = 1 (no, same as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different). Composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion and range 6 (best) to 60 (worst). Scar appearance composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion, pain and itching, range 4 (best) to 40 (worst). Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received. A lower score indicated a better outcome.
Week 24
Number of Participants With Physician Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 24
Physician rated severity of each scar using a photonumeric guide on a scale range from 1 to 5 (where 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe). Number of participants with different ratings of scar severity were reported. Same participant was reported twice, once for each breast's scar (dosing for 1 breast = 4 times EXC 001 and for other breast = 3 times).
Week 24
Number of Participants With Participant Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score
Time Frame: Week 24
Participants rated severity of each scar using a photonumeric guide on a scale range from 1 to 5 (where 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe). Number of participants with different ratings of scar severity were reported. Same participant was reported twice, once for each breast's scar (dosing for 1 breast = 4 times EXC 001 and for other breast = 3 times).
Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 16, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 16, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EXC 001-204
  • B5301004 (OTHER: Alias Study Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring

Clinical Trials on EXC 001

3
Subscribe