A Privacy-Preserving OCR-LLM System for Coronary Syndrome Subtyping From Admission HPI: Multicenter Validation in China and the US (OCR-LLM-CHD)

Development and Multicenter Validation of a Privacy-Preserving OCR-LLM Pipeline for Four-Subtype Coronary Syndrome Classification Using Admission HPI Across Heterogeneous EHR Systems

This study develops and validates a privacy-preserving OCR-LLM pipeline that converts admission history of present illness (HPI) records into structured coronary syndrome subtypes (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, and chronic coronary syndrome). The system first extracts text from de-identified HPI images using locally deployed OCR, then applies large language models with a fixed diagnostic prompt to generate subtype classification and evidence. Performance is evaluated in an internal validation cohort and multiple external datasets covering heterogeneous EHR templates, emergency department cases, and an English dataset from MIMIC-IV. A clinician usability study assesses changes in diagnostic accuracy and time with and without tool assistance.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population includes (1) de-identified clinical encounter records and (2) physician participants for usability testing. For record-based cohorts, eligible encounters contain an admission/presentation History of Present Illness (HPI) (text or image-derived text) sufficient for 4-class coronary syndrome subtyping (e.g., STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, chronic coronary syndrome). Records are analyzed at the encounter level and are organized into five dataset-based cohorts (internal validation, multicenter external validation, ED external validation, English EHR external validation, and clinician usability). Reference labels are assigned using a prespecified clinical adjudication process.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:Hospital encounters with admission HPI documenting sym

2a4afaef-9dc1-47fc-874f-9dffaf7…

evant to coronary syndrome subtyping.

Cases with sufficient documentation to assign one of four target subtypes (STEMI, NSTEMI, UA, CCS) by adjudication.

-

Exclusion Criteria: Unclear subtype or incomplete/uncertain time information preventing gold standard assignment.

Non-CHD primary reason for admission after screening (for MIMIC-IV cohort).

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Internal Development and Validation Cohort
Retrospective cohort used for model development and internal validation. Inputs are de-identified admission HPI records (image or text) from the AIM-CHD dataset. Expert adjudication provides the reference standard labels for 4-class coronary syndrome subtyping (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina, chronic coronary syndrome).
An automated clinical data management workflow integrating Optical Character Recognition (OCR), optimized prompt engineering, and large language models (LLMs). The system processes unstructured inpatient/ED records (primarily admission history of present illness and related narrative text) to extract prespecified key clinical indicators (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary syndrome subtype, medications) and to classify cases into prespecified coronary artery disease categories (e.g., unstable angina, STEMI, NSTEMI, chronic coronary syndrome). The workflow outputs structured fields and a classification result with supporting evidence excerpts.
Standard manual process in which experienced clinicians review patient medical records and extract the same prespecified clinical indicators and coronary artery disease categories using routine clinical judgment and documentation review. This manual abstraction serves as the human benchmark for comparing diagnostic accuracy, completeness, and operational efficiency against the automated OCR-Prompt-LLM workflow.
Multicenter External Validation Cohort
Retrospective multicenter cohort used for external validation across heterogeneous EHR templates and documentation styles. De-identified admission HPI records are processed through the same OCR-LLM pipeline, and predictions are compared with expert adjudicated reference labels to assess generalizability.
An automated clinical data management workflow integrating Optical Character Recognition (OCR), optimized prompt engineering, and large language models (LLMs). The system processes unstructured inpatient/ED records (primarily admission history of present illness and related narrative text) to extract prespecified key clinical indicators (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary syndrome subtype, medications) and to classify cases into prespecified coronary artery disease categories (e.g., unstable angina, STEMI, NSTEMI, chronic coronary syndrome). The workflow outputs structured fields and a classification result with supporting evidence excerpts.
Standard manual process in which experienced clinicians review patient medical records and extract the same prespecified clinical indicators and coronary artery disease categories using routine clinical judgment and documentation review. This manual abstraction serves as the human benchmark for comparing diagnostic accuracy, completeness, and operational efficiency against the automated OCR-Prompt-LLM workflow.
Emergency Department External Validation Cohort
Retrospective cohort representing real-world emergency department workflow. De-identified ED admission HPI records are used to evaluate model performance under time-sensitive, information-limited conditions and assess robustness to ED documentation variability.
An automated clinical data management workflow integrating Optical Character Recognition (OCR), optimized prompt engineering, and large language models (LLMs). The system processes unstructured inpatient/ED records (primarily admission history of present illness and related narrative text) to extract prespecified key clinical indicators (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary syndrome subtype, medications) and to classify cases into prespecified coronary artery disease categories (e.g., unstable angina, STEMI, NSTEMI, chronic coronary syndrome). The workflow outputs structured fields and a classification result with supporting evidence excerpts.
Standard manual process in which experienced clinicians review patient medical records and extract the same prespecified clinical indicators and coronary artery disease categories using routine clinical judgment and documentation review. This manual abstraction serves as the human benchmark for comparing diagnostic accuracy, completeness, and operational efficiency against the automated OCR-Prompt-LLM workflow.
English EHR External Validation Cohort
Retrospective cohort derived from the public de-identified MIMIC-IV database. English admission notes/HPI text are used to evaluate cross-language transportability and performance of the same classification prompts and post-processing rules against reference labels derived by adjudication/structured diagnosis mapping (as prespecified in the protocol).
An automated clinical data management workflow integrating Optical Character Recognition (OCR), optimized prompt engineering, and large language models (LLMs). The system processes unstructured inpatient/ED records (primarily admission history of present illness and related narrative text) to extract prespecified key clinical indicators (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary syndrome subtype, medications) and to classify cases into prespecified coronary artery disease categories (e.g., unstable angina, STEMI, NSTEMI, chronic coronary syndrome). The workflow outputs structured fields and a classification result with supporting evidence excerpts.
Standard manual process in which experienced clinicians review patient medical records and extract the same prespecified clinical indicators and coronary artery disease categories using routine clinical judgment and documentation review. This manual abstraction serves as the human benchmark for comparing diagnostic accuracy, completeness, and operational efficiency against the automated OCR-Prompt-LLM workflow.
Clinician Usability Cohort
Prospective usability evaluation cohort. Physicians complete a structured coronary syndrome subtyping task using admission HPI cases. Outcomes include diagnostic accuracy and time to completion; within-participant comparisons may be performed between unassisted and tool-assisted conditions as prespecified.
An automated clinical data management workflow integrating Optical Character Recognition (OCR), optimized prompt engineering, and large language models (LLMs). The system processes unstructured inpatient/ED records (primarily admission history of present illness and related narrative text) to extract prespecified key clinical indicators (e.g., left ventricular ejection fraction, coronary syndrome subtype, medications) and to classify cases into prespecified coronary artery disease categories (e.g., unstable angina, STEMI, NSTEMI, chronic coronary syndrome). The workflow outputs structured fields and a classification result with supporting evidence excerpts.
Standard manual process in which experienced clinicians review patient medical records and extract the same prespecified clinical indicators and coronary artery disease categories using routine clinical judgment and documentation review. This manual abstraction serves as the human benchmark for comparing diagnostic accuracy, completeness, and operational efficiency against the automated OCR-Prompt-LLM workflow.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall classification accuracy
Time Frame: 1 month

Time Frame: Up to completion of dataset evaluation (internal + external cohorts)

Description: Proportion of cases with correct subtype (STEMI/NSTEMI/UA/CCS) compared with expert-adjudicated gold standard.

1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 28, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 8, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 8, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

To protect patient privacy and comply with the data management policies of the participating institutions (Fuwai Hospital and sub-centers), individual participant data will not be made publicly available. However, aggregated study results and statistical analyses will be included in the final publication.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndromes

Clinical Trials on OCR-Prompt-LLM Information Extraction and Classification Workflow (OCR-Prompt-LLM)

Subscribe