Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated DCBs in ACS Treatment

Comparison Study of Sirolimus-Coated Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Coronary Drug-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome

This study aims to investigate and compare the local inflammatory responses and plaque healing characteristics between sirolimus-coated and paclitaxel-coated coronary drug-coated balloons in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

This prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial aims to evaluate and compare the differential effects of sirolimus-coated versus paclitaxel-coated drug-coated balloons (DCBs) on local inflammatory responses and plaque healing characteristics in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100037
        • Fuwai Hospital, CAMS&PUMC
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled:

  1. Age between 18 and 80 years old, both genders eligible;
  2. Coronary angiography showing non-complex lesions with acute coronary syndrome (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina) deemed suitable for drug-coated balloon treatment by the investigator;
  3. Visually estimated lesion length ≤28mm, visually estimated vessel diameter ≥2.5mm and ≤3.0mm;
  4. Successful lesion pre-dilation (must simultaneously meet all 3 criteria: no Type C or greater dissection; TIMI flow grade 3; visually estimated residual stenosis ≤30%);
  5. Able to understand the study purpose, willing to complete follow-up visits, and voluntarily provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria:

  1. Total occlusion (TIMI 0 flow) lesion;
  2. In-stent restenosis lesion;
  3. Concurrent left main disease or severe three-vessel disease requiring coronary artery bypass grafting;
  4. Target lesion with severe calcification or tortuosity that cannot be crossed by guidewire;
  5. Coronary artery bypass graft stenosis;
  6. Confirmed ST-elevation myocardial infarction;
  7. Cardiogenic shock or requiring mechanical respiratory and circulatory support;
  8. Hemodynamically unstable tachyarrhythmia or bradyarrhythmia;
  9. Severe renal insufficiency or undergoing hemodialysis;
  10. Known allergy or intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, heparin, contrast media, paclitaxel, sirolimus and/or other analogues;
  11. Systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic autoimmune diseases;
  12. History of stroke within 6 months prior to enrollment;
  13. Scheduled elective surgery within 6 months after enrollment requiring discontinuation of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications;
  14. Currently participating in other drug or interventional medical device clinical studies;
  15. Other conditions deemed unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sirolimus-coated DCB group
Treatment of sirolimus-coated DCB
Treatment of sirolimus-coated DCB
Active Comparator: Paclitaxel-coated DCB
Treatment of paclitaxel-coated DCB
Treatment of paclitaxel-coated DCB

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optical coherence tomography assessment of target lesion healing and repair at 3-month follow-up after the procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
OCT assessment of target lesion healing based on three morphological criteria: fibrous cap thickness (FCT), maximum lipid arc, and macrophage infiltration. Target lesion is defined as unhealed if any of the following criteria are met: (1) FCT <75μm, (2) maximum lipid arc >180°, or (3) presence of macrophage infiltration. Target lesion is defined as healed only if all three criteria are met: (1) FCT ≥75μm; (2) maximum lipid arc ≤180°; (3) absence of macrophage infiltration. The primary outcome is reported as the proportion of patients with healed target lesions.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OCT-measured minimum lumen area change at 3 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in minimum lumen area (MLA) measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: mm².
3 months
OCT-measured fibrous cap thickness change at 3 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in fibrous cap thickness (FCT) measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: μm.
3 months
OCT-measured maximum lipid arc change at 3 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in maximum lipid arc measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: degrees.
3 months
OCT assessment of macrophage infiltration change at 3 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in macrophage infiltration presence and characteristics assessed by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure.
3 months
OCT-measured thin-cap fibroatheroma count change at 3 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in number of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) lesions measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. TCFA defined as lipid-rich plaque with fibrous cap thickness <65μm. Unit: count.
3 months
OCT-measured lipid pool length change at 3 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in lipid pool length measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: mm.
3 months
OCT assessment of microchannel change at 3 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in microchannel presence and characteristics assessed by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure.
3 months
OCT-measured minimum lumen diameter change at 3 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 3 months
Change in minimum lumen diameter measured by optical coherence tomography from baseline to 3 months post-procedure. Unit: mm.
3 months
CCTA-measured perivascular fat attenuation index change at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) measured by coronary computed tomography angiography from baseline to 6 months post-procedure. FAI is defined as the mean CT attenuation value of perivascular adipose tissue surrounding the coronary artery. Unit: Hounsfield Units (HU).
6 months
CCTA-measured low-attenuation plaque volume change at 6 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in low-attenuation plaque volume measured by coronary computed tomography angiography from baseline to 6 months post-procedure. Low-attenuation plaque is defined as plaque with CT value <30 HU. Unit: mm³.
6 months
CCTA-measured plaque burden change at 6 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 6 months
Change in plaque burden measured by coronary computed tomography angiography from baseline to 6 months post-procedure. Plaque burden is calculated as plaque volume divided by total vessel volume multiplied by 100%. Unit: percentage (%).
6 months
Incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) at 6 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 6 months
Target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as a composite endpoint consisting of cardiovascular death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization.
6 months
Incidence of patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) at 6 months post-procedure
Time Frame: 6 months
Patient-oriented composite endpoint (PoCE) was defined as a composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jie Zhao, MD, PhD, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RWT-P/S-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

Clinical Trials on Sirolimus-coated DCB

Subscribe