Clinic-Community Bridge to Improve Health Outcomes for Abused Women Living With HIV/AIDS (Bridges)

June 9, 2026 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Clinic-Community Bridge-to-Care Initiative: Trauma and Violence Informed Care (TVIC) With Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and Living With HIV/AIDS

Women living with HIV/AIDS (WLWHA) in Baltimore experience disproportionately high rates of intimate partner violence (IPV), housing instability, and food insecurity, which adversely affect health outcomes. The Bartlett Bridges study is being implemented in partnership with the John G. Bartlett Infectious Diseases Specialty Practice (Bartlett Clinic) located at Johns Hopkins Hospital. The Bartlett Clinic provides comprehensive, compassionate and equitable services for infectious disease prevention, diagnosis and care. The study team will adapt and evaluate a trauma and violence-informed care (TVIC) intervention, called Confidentiality, Universal Education and Empowerment and Support (CUES), enhanced with the evidence-based myPlan safety planning app in the Bartlett Clinic to address IPV, health and safety in partnership with community organizations that provide advocacy, housing and social services. This hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial aims to improve HIV and mental health outcomes, increase safety, reduce health disparities, and identify implementation mechanisms to inform future scale-up and sustainability of the intervention in healthcare settings.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

Objectives Aim 1: Using the ADAPT-ITT framework, the clinic-community partners will collaboratively adapt/design the CUES intervention enhanced with myPlan and connections to community organizations (CUES+) to meet the complex health and safety needs of abused WLWHA. The Hopkins team and members of the investigator's clinic-community advisory board (CAB) will collaborate to adapt and design the CUES+ intervention.

Aim 2: Examine the effectiveness of the CUES+ intervention in reducing health disparities for abused WLWHA. All WLWHA clients will receive CUES+ through the clinic-community partnership. Primary outcomes (ART adherence, missed visits/proportion of visits missed, treatment adherence self-efficacy) and mental health (depression, PTSD) will be measured at baseline, 6-, and 12-months post baseline. The investigators hypothesize IPV(+) WLWHA will have poorer outcomes than IPV(-) WLWHA at baseline. After the CUES+ intervention, outcomes for IPV(+) WLWHA will approach the level of outcomes for IPV(-) WLWHA.

Aim 3: Assess the mechanisms, facilitators, and barriers to implementation of clinic-community CUES+ intervention. Aim 3a: Mechanisms (e.g., safety behaviors/resources, IPV exposure, housing stability, food security) by which CUES+ intervention improves primary outcomes will be examined. The investigators hypothesize the intervention will increase safety behaviors and resources, housing stability and food security and reduce IPV exposure resulting in improvements in primary health outcomes. An understanding of mechanisms will identify clinic-community organizational culture, resources and policies needed to sustain the partnership. Aim 3b: Examine clinic-community-based partners contextual and program factors that facilitate the intervention and are needed to sustain the partnerships. The investigators will also examine barriers and facilitators to the intervention from the perspectives of clinicians and community-based partners to inform future implementation and scale-up.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Johns Hopkins Bartlett Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult female identified patients at Hopkins Bartlett Clinic with diagnosis of HIV/AIDS

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hopkins Bartlett Clinic patient
  • HIV/AIDS positive
  • Self-identify as female
  • Adult (18 years of age or older)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not a Hopkins Bartlett Clinic patient
  • HIV/AIDS negative
  • Does not identify as female
  • Under age of 18 years of age
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Women with HIV/AIDS and IPV
Adult women receiving care at Hopkins Bartlett Clinic diagnosed with HIV/AIDS and report past year intimate partner violence (IPV)
Women with HIV/AIDS, no IPV
Adult women receiving care at Hopkins Bartlett Clinic diagnosed with HIV/AIDS, no past year IPV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression as assessed by the PROMIS Depression scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post baseline
PROMIS Depression 8. Score range 0 to 32; higher score is worse
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post baseline
HIV-related viral load
Time Frame: 12 months post baseline
Obtained from Medical Record. Score range 0->100,000; higher scores are worse
12 months post baseline
PTSD Checklist (PCL-6)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
PCL-6 - 6 items. Score range: 0-24; higher score is worse
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Retrospective HIV adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Retrospective Adherence 5-items. Score range 0-15; higher score is worse
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
HIV Adherence Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
HIV Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale 13-items. Score range 0-39; higher score is better
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Behaviors survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Safety Behaviors survey adapted from previous studies. 28 items, Score range 0-28; higher is better.
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Intimate partner violence (IPV) as assessed by the Composite Abuse Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Composite Abuse Scale (CASr-SF). 15 items, Score range 0-75; higher is worse
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Housing Stability as assessed by the Homelessness Screening Clinical Reminder
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Homelessness Screening Clinical Reminder (HSCR). 10 items, Score range 0-10; higher score is worse
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Food security as assessed by the Food Security in the US Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
USDA measure. 8 items. score range: 0 to 16; higher score is worse
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Housing Conditions as assessed by the Property Condition Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
HUD definitions, Property Condition Assessment. 2 items, score range 0 to 8; higher score is worse
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Suicide Behavior
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Ideation and attempts. 2 items, score range 0-2; higher score is worse
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post-baseline
Health and Well-being as assessed by the PROMIS Global Health Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months post baseline
PROMIS Global Health Scale. 10 items, score range 4-20; higher score is better
Baseline, 6 and 12 months post baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nancy Glass, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intimate Partner Violence

Subscribe