Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Design og test af et webbaseret værktøj til forbedring af end-of-life planlægning hos patienter med avanceret cancer

30. september 2026 opdateret af: Megan Shen, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Design og test af et webbaseret værktøj til at forbedre end-of-life planlægning blandt avancerede kræftpatienter

This clinical trial examines a web-based tool, in partnership with Peacefully, Inc, designed to improve end-of-life planning among patients with advanced cancers. This program helps users prepare comprehensively for end-of-life (e.g., medical wishes, legal estate planning, financial planning and transfer of accounts, legacy building, and emotional support). It is expected that this web-based end-of-life planning program may reduce distress and improve end-of-life preparation among advanced cancer patients.

Studieoversigt

Status

Status

Angiver den aktuelle rekrutteringsstatus eller den udvidede adgangsstatus.
Afsluttet

Betingelser

Betingelser

Den sygdom, lidelse, syndrom, sygdom eller skade, der undersøges. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tilstande også omfatte andre sundhedsrelaterede problemer, såsom levetid, livskvalitet og sundhedsrisici.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.

Detaljeret beskrivelse

OUTLINE:

Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups and their engagement in end-of-life planning is assessed at baseline and four weeks post-randomization.

Group I (intervention): Patients receive Peacefully's web-based tool to help with end-of-life planning on day 7.

Group II (control): Patients receive standard of care.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-randomization.

Undersøgelsestype

Undersøgelsestype

Beskriver karakteren af ​​en klinisk undersøgelse. Undersøgelsestyper omfatter interventionelle undersøgelser (også kaldet kliniske forsøg), observationsundersøgelser (herunder patientregistre) og udvidet adgang.
Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

Tilmelding

Antallet af deltagere i en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" tilmelding er det mål for antallet af deltagere, som forskerne skal bruge til undersøgelsen.
100

Fase

Fase

Stadiet af et klinisk forsøg, der studerer et lægemiddel eller et biologisk produkt, baseret på definitioner udviklet af U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Fasen tager udgangspunkt i undersøgelsens formål, antallet af deltagere og andre karakteristika. Der er fem faser: Tidlig fase 1 (tidligere opført som fase 0), fase 1, fase 2, fase 3 og fase 4. Ikke relevant bruges til at beskrive forsøg uden FDA-definerede faser, herunder forsøg med enheder eller adfærdsmæssige indgreb.
  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Forenede Stater
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Forenede Stater, 98109
        • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Berettigelseskriterier

De nøglekrav, som personer, der ønsker at deltage i et klinisk studie, skal opfylde eller de egenskaber, de skal have. Kvalifikationskriterier består af både inklusionskriterier (som er nødvendige for at en person kan deltage i undersøgelsen) og eksklusionskriterier (som forhindrer en person i at deltage). Typer af berettigelseskriterier omfatter, om en undersøgelse accepterer raske frivillige, har alders- eller aldersgruppekrav eller er begrænset af køn.

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of poor prognosis advanced cancer defined as locally advanced or metastatic cancer and/or disease progression following at least first line systemic therapy
  • Access to a computer or mobile device
  • The ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not fluent in English
  • Severely cognitively impaired (as measured by Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire scores of < 6)
  • Too ill or weak to complete the interviews (as judged by the interviewer)

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Støttende pleje
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Dobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm

Deltagergruppe / Arm

En gruppe eller undergruppe af deltagere i et klinisk forsøg, der modtager en specifik intervention/behandling eller ingen intervention i henhold til forsøgets protokol.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.
Eksperimentel: Group I (Peacefully's)

Patients receive Peacefully's web-based tool to help with end-of-life planning on day 7.
Andet: Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Andet: Internet-Based Intervention

Receive Peacefully's end-of-life planning program
Aktiv komparator: Group II (standard of care)

Patients receive standard care.
Andet: Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Andet: Best Practice

Receive standard of care

Andre navne:
  • plejestandard
  • standard terapi

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Primære resultatmål

I et klinisk studies protokol er det planlagte resultatmål, der er det vigtigste for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention/behandling. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har ét primært resultatmål, men nogle har mere end ét.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Comprehensive End-of-life Planning, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Will be measured using a 14-item checklist of all completed tasks from the checklists/tasks on the website (eg, gather important documents, create a will). Scores are computed by summing together the total number of planning items completed. Scores can range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of end-of-life planning tasks. Change scores can range from -14 to +14.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Comprehensive End-of-life Planning, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Will be measured using a 14-item checklist of all completed tasks from the checklists/tasks on the website (eg, gather important documents, create a will). Scores are computed by summing together the total number of planning items completed. Scores can range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of end-of-life planning tasks. Change scores can range from -14 to +14.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Comprehensive End-of-life Planning, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Will be measured using a 14-item checklist of all completed tasks from the checklists/tasks on the website (eg, gather important documents, create a will). Scores are computed by summing together the total number of planning items completed. Scores can range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of end-of-life planning tasks. Change scores can range from -14 to +14.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Sekundære resultatmål

Sekundære resultatmål

I en klinisk undersøgelses protokol er et planlagt resultatmål, der ikke er lige så vigtigt som det primære resultatmål for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention, men som stadig er af interesse. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har mere end ét sekundært resultatmål.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Decision Maker (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided who you want your medical decision maker to be?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Decision Maker (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided who you want your medical decision maker to be?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Decision Maker (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided who you want your medical decision maker to be?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Quality of Life (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around quality of life in advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided whether or not certain health situations would make your life not worth living?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning as it pertains to quality of life. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Quality of Life (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around quality of life in advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided whether or not certain health situations would make your life not worth living?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning as it pertains to quality of life. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Quality of Life (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around quality of life in advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided whether or not certain health situations would make your life not worth living?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning as it pertains to quality of life. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Conversations Discussing EoL Care, Living Will, HCP, and DNR Orders With Family Members/Loved Ones and Doctors, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Engagement in ACP with family members/loved ones and doctors will be assessed in patients. This outcome will consist of documentation of ACP conversations using the investigators' previously utilized 8-item measure of discussing EoL care, living will, HCP, and DNR orders with family (4 items) and doctors (4 items). Scores for the subscale are computed by summing together the total number of ACP topic discussed with the patient's family members/loved ones and doctors. Scores can range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating increases in engagement in ACP conversations with family members/loved ones and doctors. Change scores can range from -8 to +8.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Conversations Discussing EoL Care, Living Will, HCP, and DNR Orders With Family Members/Loved Ones and Doctors, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Engagement in ACP with family members/loved ones and doctors will be assessed in patients. This outcome will consist of documentation of ACP conversations using the investigators' previously utilized 8-item measure of discussing EoL care, living will, HCP, and DNR orders with family (4 items) and doctors (4 items). Scores for the subscale are computed by summing together the total number of ACP topic discussed with the patient's family members/loved ones and doctors. Scores can range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating increases in engagement in ACP conversations with family members/loved ones and doctors. Change scores can range from -8 to +8.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Conversations Discussing EoL Care, Living Will, HCP, and DNR Orders With Family Members/Loved Ones and Doctors, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Engagement in ACP with family members/loved ones and doctors will be assessed in patients. This outcome will consist of documentation of ACP conversations using the investigators' previously utilized 8-item measure of discussing EoL care, living will, HCP, and DNR orders with family (4 items) and doctors (4 items). Scores for the subscale are computed by summing together the total number of ACP topic discussed with the patient's family members/loved ones and doctors. Scores can range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating increases in engagement in ACP conversations with family members/loved ones and doctors. Change scores can range from -8 to +8.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Completion of Advance Directives, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Completion of advance directives will be assessed by asking patients whether they completed a do-not-resuscitate order, a living will, and/or identified a health care proxy; data will be verified through the patient's electronic health record. Change in these numbers will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Scores are computed by summing together the total number of advance directives completed. Scores can range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of advance directives. Change scores can range from -3 to +3.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Completion of Advance Directives, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Completion of advance directives will be assessed by asking patients whether they completed a do-not-resuscitate order, a living will, and/or identified a health care proxy; data will be verified through the patient's electronic health record. Change in these numbers will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Scores are computed by summing together the total number of advance directives completed. Scores can range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of advance directives. Change scores can range from -3 to +3.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Completion of Advance Directives, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Completion of advance directives will be assessed by asking patients whether they completed a do-not-resuscitate order, a living will, and/or identified a health care proxy; data will be verified through the patient's electronic health record. Change in these numbers will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Scores are computed by summing together the total number of advance directives completed. Scores can range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of advance directives. Change scores can range from -3 to +3.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Anxiety, as Measured by the Anxiety Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Anxiety will be measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), a valid and reliable 7-item, Likert-type self-report measure of mood disturbance commonly used with cancer patients. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a HADS-A total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 21, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of anxiety. Change in anxiety will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -21 to +21.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Anxiety, as Measured by the Anxiety Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Anxiety will be measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), a valid and reliable 7-item, Likert-type self-report measure of mood disturbance commonly used with cancer patients. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a HADS-A total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 21, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of anxiety. Change in anxiety will be assessed at baseline and post-randomization. Change scores can range from -21 to +21.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Anxiety, as Measured by the Anxiety Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Anxiety will be measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), a valid and reliable 7-item, Likert-type self-report measure of mood disturbance commonly used with cancer patients. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a HADS-A total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 21, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of anxiety. Change in anxiety will be assessed at baseline and post-randomization. Change scores can range from -21 to +21.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Psychological Distress will be measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), a valid and reliable 20-item, Likert-type self-report measure of frequency and severity of depressive symptoms over the previous week. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 60, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of psychological distress. Change in psychological distress will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -60 to +60.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and week 12 post-randomization

Psychological Distress will be measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), a valid and reliable 20-item, Likert-type self-report measure of frequency and severity of depressive symptoms over the previous week. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 60, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of psychological distress. Change in psychological distress will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -60 to +60.
Baseline and week 12 post-randomization
Change in Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Psychological Distress will be measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), a valid and reliable 20-item, Likert-type self-report measure of frequency and severity of depressive symptoms over the previous week. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 60, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of psychological distress. Change in psychological distress will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -60 to +60.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Emotional Social Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Scale, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Emotional and social well-being will be measured using the 27-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale. The FACT-G scale contains 27 items that ask patients to rate the degree to which they agree to statements about their well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating better well-being. Total scores can range from 0-108. Change in emotional and social well-being will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -108 to +108.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Emotional Social Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Scale, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Emotional and social well-being will be measured using the 27-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale. The FACT-G scale contains 27 items that ask patients to rate the degree to which they agree to statements about their well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating better well-being. Total scores can range from 0-108. Change in emotional and social well-being will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -108 to +108.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Emotional Social Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Scale, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Emotional and social well-being will be measured using the 27-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale. The FACT-G scale contains 27 items that ask patients to rate the degree to which they agree to statements about their well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating better well-being. Total scores can range from 0-108. Change in emotional and social well-being will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -108 to +108.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Spiritual Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp), From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Spiritual well-being will be measured using the validated, 12-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). The FACIT-Sp asks patients to indicate the degree to which they agree with statements about their spiritual well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating greater spiritual well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 48. Change in spiritual well-being will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -48 to +48.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Spiritual Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Spiritual well-being will be measured using the validated, 12-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). The FACIT-Sp asks patients to indicate the degree to which they agree with statements about their spiritual well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating greater spiritual well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 48. Change in spiritual well-being will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -48 to +48.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Spiritual Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Spiritual well-being will be measured using the validated, 12-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). The FACIT-Sp asks patients to indicate the degree to which they agree with statements about their spiritual well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating greater spiritual well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 48. Change in spiritual well-being will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -48 to +48.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Financial Well-being, as Measured by the InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Financial well-being will be measured using the validated, 8-item InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being scale. This scale asks patients to rate their financial wellness (stress, satisfaction, etc.) on a 10-point Likert scale that varies for each response but for which 1 indicates the lowest financial well-being and 10 indicates the highest (e.g., 1=overwhelming stress to 10 = not stress at all; 1 = worry all the time, 10 - never worry). Total scores range from 8 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater financial well-being. Change in financial well-being will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -72 to +72.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Financial Well-being, as Measured by the InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Financial well-being will be measured using the validated, 8-item InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being scale. This scale asks patients to rate their financial wellness (stress, satisfaction, etc.) on a 10-point Likert scale that varies for each response but for which 1 indicates the lowest financial well-being and 10 indicates the highest (e.g., 1=overwhelming stress to 10 = not stress at all; 1 = worry all the time, 10 - never worry). Total scores range from 8 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater financial well-being. Change in financial well-being will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -72 to +72.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Financial Well-being, as Measured by the InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Tidsramme: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Financial well-being will be measured using the validated, 8-item InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being scale. This scale asks patients to rate their financial wellness (stress, satisfaction, etc.) on a 10-point Likert scale that varies for each response but for which 1 indicates the lowest financial well-being and 10 indicates the highest (e.g., 1=overwhelming stress to 10 = not stress at all; 1 = worry all the time, 10 - never worry). Total scores range from 8 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater financial well-being. Change in financial well-being will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -72 to +72.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person, der igangsætter undersøgelsen, og som har myndighed og kontrol over undersøgelsen.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Samarbejdspartnere

Samarbejdspartnere

En anden organisation end sponsoren, der yder støtte til en klinisk undersøgelse. Denne støtte kan omfatte aktiviteter relateret til finansiering, design, implementering, dataanalyse eller rapportering.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Peacefully, Inc.

Efterforskere

Efterforskere

En forsker involveret i et klinisk studie. Beslægtede termer omfatter stedets principal investigator, site sub-investigator, studieformand, undersøgelsesleder og undersøgelseshovedinvestigator.
  • Ledende efterforsker: Megan J. Shen, Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

Studiestart

Den faktiske dato, hvor den første deltager blev tilmeldt en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" undersøgelses startdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens startdato.
21. maj 2024

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

Primær færdiggørelse

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention for at indsamle endelige data for det primære resultatmål. Hvorvidt det kliniske studie sluttede i henhold til protokollen eller blev afsluttet, påvirker ikke denne dato. For kliniske undersøgelser med mere end ét primært resultatmål med forskellige afslutningsdatoer refererer dette udtryk til den dato, hvor dataindsamlingen er afsluttet for alle de primære resultatmål. Den "forventede" primære afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være den primære afslutningsdato for undersøgelsen.
26. november 2025

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

Studieafslutning

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention/behandling for at indsamle endelige data for de primære resultatmål, sekundære udfaldsmål og uønskede hændelser (det vil sige den sidste deltagers sidste besøg). Den "forventede" undersøgelses afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens afslutningsdato.
26. november 2025

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

Først indsendt

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsendte en undersøgelsespost til ClinicalTrials.gov. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den første indsendte dato og postens tilgængelighed på ClinicalTrials.gov (den første offentliggjorte dato).
29. september 2022

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsender en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Sponsoren eller investigatoren skal muligvis revidere og indsende en undersøgelsespost en eller flere gange, før NLM's kvalitetskontrolkriterier er opfyldt. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
29. september 2022

Først opslået (Faktiske)

Først opslået

Datoen, hvor undersøgelsesposten først var tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgang er afsluttet. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte undersøgelsesposten, og den første offentliggjorte dato.
3. oktober 2022

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

Sidste opdatering sendt

Den seneste dato, hvor ændringer i en undersøgelsespost blev gjort tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Der kan være en forsinkelse mellem det tidspunkt, hvornår ændringerne blev indsendt til ClinicalTrials.gov af undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator (datoen for sidste opdatering afsendt) og den sidste opdatering, der blev sendt.
2. oktober 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte ændringer til en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
30. september 2026

Sidst verificeret

Sidst verificeret

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator bekræftede oplysningerne om en klinisk undersøgelse på ClinicalTrials.gov som nøjagtige og aktuelle. Hvis en undersøgelse med rekrutteringsstatus som rekruttering; rekrutterer endnu ikke; eller aktiv, ikke rekruttering er ikke blevet bekræftet inden for de seneste 2 år, er undersøgelsens rekrutteringsstatus vist som ukendt.
1. september 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre identifikatorer eller ID-numre end NCT-nummeret, der er tildelt til en klinisk undersøgelse af undersøgelsens sponsor, finansieringsgivere eller andre. Disse numre kan omfatte unikke identifikatorer fra andre forsøgsregistre og National Institutes of Health-bevillingsnumre.
  • RG1123556
  • R44NR020341 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)
  • NCI-2024-03279 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • 20230 (Anden identifikator: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Cookieindstillinger

Vi bruger cookies for at sikre, at vi giver dig den bedste oplevelse på vores hjemmeside. For flere detaljer skal du læse omhyggeligt vores Politik om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger og cookies. ...>>>Du kan når som helst ændre dine præferencer eller trække dit samtykke tilbage ved at slette cookies fra din hjemmeside eller computer som beskrevet i politikken. Accepter det og vælg dine præferencer ved at markere de tilsvarende felter i afsnittet "Administrer indstillinger" nedenfor. Læs vores servicevilkår omhyggeligt, inden du fortsætter med at bruge nogen del af dette websted.
«Administrer indstillinger