Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Design und Test eines webbasierten Tools zur Verbesserung der Planung am Lebensende bei Patienten mit fortgeschrittenem Krebs

30. September 2026 aktualisiert von: Megan Shen, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Design und Test eines webbasierten Tools zur Verbesserung der Lebensende-Planung bei Krebspatienten im fortgeschrittenen Stadium

This clinical trial examines a web-based tool, in partnership with Peacefully, Inc, designed to improve end-of-life planning among patients with advanced cancers. This program helps users prepare comprehensively for end-of-life (e.g., medical wishes, legal estate planning, financial planning and transfer of accounts, legacy building, and emotional support). It is expected that this web-based end-of-life planning program may reduce distress and improve end-of-life preparation among advanced cancer patients.

Studienübersicht

Status

Status

Zeigt den aktuellen Rekrutierungsstatus oder den erweiterten Zugriffsstatus an.
Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Bedingungen

Die Krankheit, Störung, das Syndrom, die Krankheit oder die Verletzung, die untersucht wird. Auf ClinicalTrials.gov können die Bedingungen auch andere gesundheitsbezogene Themen wie Lebensdauer, Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsrisiken umfassen.

Intervention / Behandlung

Intervention / Behandlung

Ein Prozess oder eine Handlung, die im Mittelpunkt einer klinischen Studie steht. Interventionen umfassen Medikamente, medizinische Geräte, Verfahren, Impfstoffe und andere Produkte, die entweder in der Erprobungsphase oder bereits verfügbar sind. Interventionen können auch nicht-invasive Ansätze umfassen, wie z. B. Aufklärung oder eine Änderung der Ernährung und Bewegung.

Detaillierte Beschreibung

OUTLINE:

Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups and their engagement in end-of-life planning is assessed at baseline and four weeks post-randomization.

Group I (intervention): Patients receive Peacefully's web-based tool to help with end-of-life planning on day 7.

Group II (control): Patients receive standard of care.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-randomization.

Studientyp

Studientyp

Beschreibt die Art einer klinischen Studie. Zu den Studientypen gehören Interventionsstudien (auch klinische Studien genannt), Beobachtungsstudien (einschließlich Patientenregister) und erweiterter Zugang.
Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

Einschreibung

Die Anzahl der Teilnehmer an einer klinischen Studie. Die „erwartete“ Einschreibung ist die Zielzahl an Teilnehmern, die die Forscher für die Studie benötigen.
100

Phase

Phase

Das Stadium einer klinischen Studie, in der ein Medikament oder ein biologisches Produkt untersucht wird, basierend auf Definitionen, die von der U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) entwickelt wurden. Die Phase richtet sich nach dem Ziel der Studie, der Anzahl der Teilnehmer und anderen Merkmalen. Es gibt fünf Phasen: Frühe Phase 1 (früher als Phase 0 aufgeführt), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3 und Phase 4. Nicht zutreffend wird verwendet, um Studien ohne von der FDA definierte Phasen zu beschreiben, einschließlich Studien zu Geräten oder Verhaltensinterventionen.
  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, Vereinigte Staaten, 98109
        • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Zulassungskriterien

Die wichtigsten Voraussetzungen, die Personen erfüllen müssen, die an einer klinischen Studie teilnehmen möchten, bzw. welche Eigenschaften sie mitbringen müssen. Auswahlkriterien bestehen sowohl aus Einschlusskriterien (die erforderlich sind, damit eine Person an der Studie teilnehmen kann) als auch aus Ausschlusskriterien (die eine Person an der Teilnahme hindern). Arten von Zulassungskriterien umfassen, ob eine Studie gesunde Freiwillige akzeptiert, Alters- oder Altersgruppenanforderungen hat oder durch das Geschlecht begrenzt ist.

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of poor prognosis advanced cancer defined as locally advanced or metastatic cancer and/or disease progression following at least first line systemic therapy
  • Access to a computer or mobile device
  • The ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not fluent in English
  • Severely cognitively impaired (as measured by Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire scores of < 6)
  • Too ill or weak to complete the interviews (as judged by the interviewer)

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Unterstützende Pflege
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm

Eine Gruppe oder Untergruppe von Teilnehmern an einer klinischen Studie, die gemäß dem Protokoll der Studie eine bestimmte Intervention/Behandlung oder keine Intervention erhält.
Intervention / Behandlung

Intervention / Behandlung

Ein Prozess oder eine Handlung, die im Mittelpunkt einer klinischen Studie steht. Interventionen umfassen Medikamente, medizinische Geräte, Verfahren, Impfstoffe und andere Produkte, die entweder in der Erprobungsphase oder bereits verfügbar sind. Interventionen können auch nicht-invasive Ansätze umfassen, wie z. B. Aufklärung oder eine Änderung der Ernährung und Bewegung.
Experimental: Group I (Peacefully's)

Patients receive Peacefully's web-based tool to help with end-of-life planning on day 7.
Sonstiges: Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sonstiges: Internet-Based Intervention

Receive Peacefully's end-of-life planning program
Aktiver Komparator: Group II (standard of care)

Patients receive standard care.
Sonstiges: Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sonstiges: Best Practice

Receive standard of care

Andere Namen:
  • Pflegestandard
  • Standardtherapie

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Im Protokoll einer klinischen Studie die geplante Ergebnismessung, die für die Bewertung der Wirkung einer Intervention/Behandlung am wichtigsten ist. Die meisten klinischen Studien haben einen primären Endpunkt, aber einige haben mehr als einen.
Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Comprehensive End-of-life Planning, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Will be measured using a 14-item checklist of all completed tasks from the checklists/tasks on the website (eg, gather important documents, create a will). Scores are computed by summing together the total number of planning items completed. Scores can range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of end-of-life planning tasks. Change scores can range from -14 to +14.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Comprehensive End-of-life Planning, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Will be measured using a 14-item checklist of all completed tasks from the checklists/tasks on the website (eg, gather important documents, create a will). Scores are computed by summing together the total number of planning items completed. Scores can range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of end-of-life planning tasks. Change scores can range from -14 to +14.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Comprehensive End-of-life Planning, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Will be measured using a 14-item checklist of all completed tasks from the checklists/tasks on the website (eg, gather important documents, create a will). Scores are computed by summing together the total number of planning items completed. Scores can range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of end-of-life planning tasks. Change scores can range from -14 to +14.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Im Protokoll einer klinischen Studie ein geplantes Ergebnismaß, das nicht so wichtig ist wie das primäre Ergebnismaß für die Bewertung der Wirkung einer Intervention, aber dennoch von Interesse ist. Die meisten klinischen Studien haben mehr als einen sekundären Endpunkt.
Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Decision Maker (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided who you want your medical decision maker to be?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Decision Maker (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided who you want your medical decision maker to be?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Decision Maker Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Decision Maker (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided who you want your medical decision maker to be?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Quality of Life (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around quality of life in advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided whether or not certain health situations would make your life not worth living?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning as it pertains to quality of life. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Quality of Life (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around quality of life in advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided whether or not certain health situations would make your life not worth living?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning as it pertains to quality of life. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Patients' Engagement in Advance Care Planning, as Measured by the Quality of Life Subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Change in patient engagement in advance care planning will be assessed in patients using the reliable and valid Quality of Life (four items) subscale of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Action Measures. Response options include: yes=1, no=0. Questions include those asking about whether patients have engaged in a decision around quality of life in advance care planning (e.g., "Have you already decided whether or not certain health situations would make your life not worth living?") Individual scores can range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating that more decisions have been made around advance care planning as it pertains to quality of life. Change scores can range from -4 to +4.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Conversations Discussing EoL Care, Living Will, HCP, and DNR Orders With Family Members/Loved Ones and Doctors, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Engagement in ACP with family members/loved ones and doctors will be assessed in patients. This outcome will consist of documentation of ACP conversations using the investigators' previously utilized 8-item measure of discussing EoL care, living will, HCP, and DNR orders with family (4 items) and doctors (4 items). Scores for the subscale are computed by summing together the total number of ACP topic discussed with the patient's family members/loved ones and doctors. Scores can range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating increases in engagement in ACP conversations with family members/loved ones and doctors. Change scores can range from -8 to +8.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Conversations Discussing EoL Care, Living Will, HCP, and DNR Orders With Family Members/Loved Ones and Doctors, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Engagement in ACP with family members/loved ones and doctors will be assessed in patients. This outcome will consist of documentation of ACP conversations using the investigators' previously utilized 8-item measure of discussing EoL care, living will, HCP, and DNR orders with family (4 items) and doctors (4 items). Scores for the subscale are computed by summing together the total number of ACP topic discussed with the patient's family members/loved ones and doctors. Scores can range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating increases in engagement in ACP conversations with family members/loved ones and doctors. Change scores can range from -8 to +8.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Conversations Discussing EoL Care, Living Will, HCP, and DNR Orders With Family Members/Loved Ones and Doctors, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Engagement in ACP with family members/loved ones and doctors will be assessed in patients. This outcome will consist of documentation of ACP conversations using the investigators' previously utilized 8-item measure of discussing EoL care, living will, HCP, and DNR orders with family (4 items) and doctors (4 items). Scores for the subscale are computed by summing together the total number of ACP topic discussed with the patient's family members/loved ones and doctors. Scores can range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating increases in engagement in ACP conversations with family members/loved ones and doctors. Change scores can range from -8 to +8.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Completion of Advance Directives, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Completion of advance directives will be assessed by asking patients whether they completed a do-not-resuscitate order, a living will, and/or identified a health care proxy; data will be verified through the patient's electronic health record. Change in these numbers will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Scores are computed by summing together the total number of advance directives completed. Scores can range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of advance directives. Change scores can range from -3 to +3.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Completion of Advance Directives, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Completion of advance directives will be assessed by asking patients whether they completed a do-not-resuscitate order, a living will, and/or identified a health care proxy; data will be verified through the patient's electronic health record. Change in these numbers will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Scores are computed by summing together the total number of advance directives completed. Scores can range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of advance directives. Change scores can range from -3 to +3.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Advance Care Planning Engagement: Completion of Advance Directives, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Completion of advance directives will be assessed by asking patients whether they completed a do-not-resuscitate order, a living will, and/or identified a health care proxy; data will be verified through the patient's electronic health record. Change in these numbers will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Scores are computed by summing together the total number of advance directives completed. Scores can range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating increases in completion of advance directives. Change scores can range from -3 to +3.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Anxiety, as Measured by the Anxiety Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Anxiety will be measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), a valid and reliable 7-item, Likert-type self-report measure of mood disturbance commonly used with cancer patients. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a HADS-A total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 21, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of anxiety. Change in anxiety will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -21 to +21.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Anxiety, as Measured by the Anxiety Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Anxiety will be measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), a valid and reliable 7-item, Likert-type self-report measure of mood disturbance commonly used with cancer patients. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a HADS-A total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 21, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of anxiety. Change in anxiety will be assessed at baseline and post-randomization. Change scores can range from -21 to +21.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Anxiety, as Measured by the Anxiety Subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Anxiety will be measured using the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), a valid and reliable 7-item, Likert-type self-report measure of mood disturbance commonly used with cancer patients. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a HADS-A total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 21, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of anxiety. Change in anxiety will be assessed at baseline and post-randomization. Change scores can range from -21 to +21.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Psychological Distress will be measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), a valid and reliable 20-item, Likert-type self-report measure of frequency and severity of depressive symptoms over the previous week. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 60, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of psychological distress. Change in psychological distress will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -60 to +60.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and week 12 post-randomization

Psychological Distress will be measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), a valid and reliable 20-item, Likert-type self-report measure of frequency and severity of depressive symptoms over the previous week. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 60, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of psychological distress. Change in psychological distress will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -60 to +60.
Baseline and week 12 post-randomization
Change in Psychological Distress, as Measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Psychological Distress will be measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD), a valid and reliable 20-item, Likert-type self-report measure of frequency and severity of depressive symptoms over the previous week. Each item on this scale is rated on a 4-point scale (0 to 3), and all items are summed to create a total score. Total scores can range from 0 to 60, with higher numbers indicating higher levels of psychological distress. Change in psychological distress will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -60 to +60.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Emotional Social Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Scale, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Emotional and social well-being will be measured using the 27-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale. The FACT-G scale contains 27 items that ask patients to rate the degree to which they agree to statements about their well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating better well-being. Total scores can range from 0-108. Change in emotional and social well-being will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -108 to +108.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Emotional Social Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Scale, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Emotional and social well-being will be measured using the 27-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale. The FACT-G scale contains 27 items that ask patients to rate the degree to which they agree to statements about their well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating better well-being. Total scores can range from 0-108. Change in emotional and social well-being will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -108 to +108.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Emotional Social Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Scale, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Emotional and social well-being will be measured using the 27-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale. The FACT-G scale contains 27 items that ask patients to rate the degree to which they agree to statements about their well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating better well-being. Total scores can range from 0-108. Change in emotional and social well-being will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -108 to +108.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Spiritual Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp), From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Spiritual well-being will be measured using the validated, 12-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). The FACIT-Sp asks patients to indicate the degree to which they agree with statements about their spiritual well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating greater spiritual well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 48. Change in spiritual well-being will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -48 to +48.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Spiritual Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Spiritual well-being will be measured using the validated, 12-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). The FACIT-Sp asks patients to indicate the degree to which they agree with statements about their spiritual well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating greater spiritual well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 48. Change in spiritual well-being will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -48 to +48.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Spiritual Well-being, as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Spiritual well-being will be measured using the validated, 12-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). The FACIT-Sp asks patients to indicate the degree to which they agree with statements about their spiritual well-being. Each item on this scale is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all, 4 = very much), with higher scores indicating greater spiritual well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 48. Change in spiritual well-being will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -48 to +48.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization
Change in Financial Well-being, as Measured by the InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 4 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization

Financial well-being will be measured using the validated, 8-item InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being scale. This scale asks patients to rate their financial wellness (stress, satisfaction, etc.) on a 10-point Likert scale that varies for each response but for which 1 indicates the lowest financial well-being and 10 indicates the highest (e.g., 1=overwhelming stress to 10 = not stress at all; 1 = worry all the time, 10 - never worry). Total scores range from 8 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater financial well-being. Change in financial well-being will be assessed at baseline and 4 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -72 to +72.
Baseline and Week 4 post-randomization
Change in Financial Well-being, as Measured by the InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 12 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization

Financial well-being will be measured using the validated, 8-item InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being scale. This scale asks patients to rate their financial wellness (stress, satisfaction, etc.) on a 10-point Likert scale that varies for each response but for which 1 indicates the lowest financial well-being and 10 indicates the highest (e.g., 1=overwhelming stress to 10 = not stress at all; 1 = worry all the time, 10 - never worry). Total scores range from 8 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater financial well-being. Change in financial well-being will be assessed at baseline and 12 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -72 to +72.
Baseline and Week 12 post-randomization
Change in Financial Well-being, as Measured by the InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale, From Baseline to 24 Weeks Post-randomization
Zeitfenster: Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Financial well-being will be measured using the validated, 8-item InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being scale. This scale asks patients to rate their financial wellness (stress, satisfaction, etc.) on a 10-point Likert scale that varies for each response but for which 1 indicates the lowest financial well-being and 10 indicates the highest (e.g., 1=overwhelming stress to 10 = not stress at all; 1 = worry all the time, 10 - never worry). Total scores range from 8 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater financial well-being. Change in financial well-being will be assessed at baseline and 24 weeks post-randomization. Change scores can range from -72 to +72.
Baseline and Week 24 post-randomization

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Die Organisation oder Person, die die Studie initiiert und die Autorität und Kontrolle über die Studie hat.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Mitarbeiter

Mitarbeiter

Eine andere Organisation als der Sponsor, die eine klinische Studie unterstützt. Diese Unterstützung kann Aktivitäten im Zusammenhang mit Finanzierung, Design, Implementierung, Datenanalyse oder Berichterstattung umfassen.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Peacefully, Inc.

Ermittler

Ermittler

Ein Forscher, der an einer klinischen Studie beteiligt ist. Zu den verwandten Begriffen gehören Studienleiter, Unterprüfer am Standort, Studienleiter, Studienleiter und Studienleiter.
  • Hauptermittler: Megan J. Shen, Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

Studienbeginn

Das tatsächliche Datum, an dem der erste Teilnehmer in eine klinische Studie aufgenommen wurde. Das „voraussichtliche“ Studienstartdatum ist das Datum, von dem die Forscher glauben, dass es das Studienstartdatum sein wird.
21. Mai 2024

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

Primärer Abschluss

Das Datum, an dem der letzte Teilnehmer einer klinischen Studie untersucht wurde oder eine Intervention erhalten hat, um endgültige Daten für das primäre Ergebnis zu sammeln. Ob die klinische Studie protokollgemäß endete oder beendet wurde, hat keinen Einfluss auf dieses Datum. Bei klinischen Studien mit mehr als einem primären Ergebnismaß mit unterschiedlichen Abschlussdaten bezieht sich dieser Begriff auf das Datum, an dem die Datenerhebung für alle primären Ergebnismaße abgeschlossen ist. Das „erwartete“ primäre Abschlussdatum ist das Datum, von dem die Forscher glauben, dass es das primäre Abschlussdatum für die Studie sein wird.
26. November 2025

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

Studienabschluss

Das Datum, an dem der letzte Teilnehmer an einer klinischen Studie untersucht wurde oder eine Intervention/Behandlung erhielt, um endgültige Daten für die primären Ergebnismaße, sekundären Ergebnismaße und Nebenwirkungen zu sammeln (d. h. der letzte Besuch des letzten Teilnehmers). Das „voraussichtliche“ Abschlussdatum der Studie ist das Datum, von dem die Forscher glauben, dass es das Abschlussdatum der Studie sein wird.
26. November 2025

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

Zuerst eingereicht

Das Datum, an dem der Studiensponsor oder Prüfer zum ersten Mal einen Studienbericht bei ClinicalTrials.gov eingereicht hat. Zwischen dem Datum der ersten Einreichung und der Verfügbarkeit des Datensatzes auf ClinicalTrials.gov (dem ersten veröffentlichten Datum) liegt in der Regel eine Verzögerung von einigen Tagen.
29. September 2022

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

Das Datum, an dem der Studiensponsor oder Prüfer zum ersten Mal einen Studienbericht einreicht, der den Qualitätskontrollkriterien (QC) der National Library of Medicine (NLM) entspricht. Der Sponsor oder Prüfer muss möglicherweise einen Studienbericht ein- oder mehrmals überarbeiten und einreichen, bevor die QC-Überprüfungskriterien von NLM erfüllt sind. Es liegt in der Verantwortung des Sponsors oder Prüfers, sicherzustellen, dass die Studienaufzeichnung mit den NLM-QC-Überprüfungskriterien übereinstimmt.
29. September 2022

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

Zuerst gepostet

Das Datum, an dem der Studienbericht zum ersten Mal auf ClinicalTrials.gov verfügbar war, nachdem die Qualitätskontrolle (QC) der National Library of Medicine (NLM) abgeschlossen wurde. Zwischen dem Datum, an dem der Studiensponsor oder Prüfer den Studienbericht eingereicht hat, und dem ersten veröffentlichten Datum liegt in der Regel eine Verzögerung von einigen Tagen.
3. Oktober 2022

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

Letztes Update gepostet

Das letzte Datum, an dem Änderungen an einem Studienbericht auf ClinicalTrials.gov verfügbar gemacht wurden. Es kann eine Verzögerung zwischen der Übermittlung der Änderungen an ClinicalTrials.gov durch den Sponsor oder Prüfer der Studie (Datum der letzten eingereichten Aktualisierung) und dem Datum der letzten Veröffentlichung der Aktualisierung geben.
2. Oktober 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

Das letzte Datum, an dem der Studiensponsor oder Prüfer Änderungen an einem Studienbericht eingereicht hat, die mit den Qualitätskontrollkriterien (QC) der National Library of Medicine (NLM) übereinstimmen. Es liegt in der Verantwortung des Sponsors oder Prüfers, sicherzustellen, dass die Studienaufzeichnung mit den NLM-QC-Überprüfungskriterien übereinstimmt.
30. September 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

Zuletzt verifiziert

Das letzte Datum, an dem der Studiensponsor oder Prüfer die Informationen über eine klinische Studie auf ClinicalTrials.gov als richtig und aktuell bestätigt hat. Wenn eine Studie den Rekrutierungsstatus Recruiting hat; noch keine Rekrutierung; oder aktiv, keine Rekrutierung wurde innerhalb der letzten 2 Jahre nicht bestätigt, der Rekrutierungsstatus der Studie wird als unbekannt angezeigt.
1. September 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

Andere Identifikatoren oder ID-Nummern als die NCT-Nummer, die einer klinischen Studie vom Sponsor der Studie, Geldgebern oder anderen zugewiesen werden. Diese Nummern können eindeutige Kennungen von anderen Studienregistern und Zuschussnummern der National Institutes of Health enthalten.
  • RG1123556
  • R44NR020341 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)
  • NCI-2024-03279 (Registrierungskennung: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))
  • 20230 (Andere Kennung: Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium)

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Cookie-Einstellungen

Wir verwenden Cookies, um sicherzustellen, dass Sie auf unserer Website die bestmögliche Erfahrung machen. Weitere Informationen finden Sie in unserer Datenschutz- und Cookie-Richtlinien. ...>>>Sie können Ihre Einstellungen jederzeit ändern oder Ihre Einwilligung widerrufen, indem Sie die Cookies wie in der Richtlinie beschrieben von Ihrer Website oder Ihrem Computer löschen. Bitte akzeptieren Sie es und wählen Sie Ihre Einstellungen, indem Sie die entsprechenden Kästchen im Abschnitt "Einstellungen verwalten" unten ankreuzen. Bitte lesen Sie unsere Nutzungsbedingungen sorgfältig durch, bevor Sie einen Teil dieser Website nutzen.
«Einstellungen verwalten