Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Serummetabolikbaseret metode til diagnosticering af galdesyrediarré

22. september 2026 opdateret af: Asger Lund, MD, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen

Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. One of the challenges of BAD is the lack of a readily available and accurate diagnostic test.

The aim of this study is to validate a BAD diagnostic score (BDS) based on metabolomics.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. The pathophysiology of BAD involves spill-over of bile acids to the colon where bile acids irritate the colonic mucosa and cause osmotic-induced fluid secretion. The aetiology of BAD can be either idiopathic (termed primary BAD or type 2 BAD) or the disease can develop secondary to ileal dysfunction (due to, e.g., intestinal surgery or Chron's disease, termed type 1 BAD) or other conditions interfering with ileal absorption (due to, e.g., cholecystectomy or radiation therapy, termed type 3 BAD).

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant diarrhoea is a common condition in the general population (prevalence of around 4%) and emerging data suggest that around 1/3 suffering from this condition in fact have BAD. Many of these patients remains undiagnosed and thus,inappropriately treated or even untreated. A major reason for this is challenges associated with diagnosing BAD. Several diagnostic modalities have been suggested including 14C-glycocholate breath test, stool test and assessment of 48-hour faecal bile acid output. These tests are cumbersome, time-consuming, and not widely available. The 75selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) test is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of BAD. It measures, via a standard gamma camera, the 7-day retention of a taurine-conjugated bile acid analogue labelled with the gamma-emitter 75selenium. This test provides a quantitative assessment to estimate the severity of BAD, but there is no general agreement regarding its cut-off value and the test is not widely available or even approved for clinical use in many countries outside Europe, including the USA. Furthermore, the SeHCAT test is cumbersome due to its dependence on two visits to the clinic exactly seven days apart, it is expensive, and involves radioactive exposure to the patient. Given the limited availability and the challenges associated with the abovementioned tests, excluding BAD is unfortunately not within current routine investigational algorithms for diarrhoea-predominant IBS, Crohn's disease, or gastrointestinal cancers. In many cases, BAD diagnosis is considered after therapeutic trial using bile acid sequestrants. However, these agents are expensive, often ineffective and/or associated with gastrointestinal side effects in patients with established BAD why their potential as diagnostic tools is limited. Taken together, diagnosing BAD is currently associated with challenges that may preclude relevant treatment of this debilitating condition warranting development of easy and accessible yet safe and effective BAD diagnostics. Recently, the investigators have developed a new BAD diagnostic method based on a single blood sample from the patient. Our approach is based on unbiased, metabolic profiling of serum from BAD patients and carefully matched healthy individuals using comprehensive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass-spectrometry. These comprehensive datasets were subjected to state-of-the-art machine learning and used to build a BAD diagnostic score (BDS) that can distinguish a patient suffering BAD from healthy individuals with high precision (sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 93%). In the present study, the investigators will refine the BDS to distinguish between patients suffering from BAD and patients suffering from other diarrhoeal diseases by using the same methods and data analyses as in the previous project, but in this case applied to serum samples collected from patients referred to diagnostic SeHCAT test, i.e., samples from both test-positive and test-negative patients.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

150

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Copenhagen, Danmark
        • Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
      • Hellerup, Danmark
        • Herlev Gentofte Hospital
      • Hillerød, Danmark
        • Hillerød Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

The study population consists of SeHCAT referred patients for suspected bile acid diarrhoea.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • SeHCAT referral for suspected bile acid diarrhoea
  • Age ≥18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes, except type 2 diabetes
  • Nephropathy with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 min/1.73 m2
  • Treatment with medicine that cannot be paused for 12 hours
  • Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, if not well regulated
  • Active or recent (<6 months since last treatment) malignant disease
  • Any treatment or condition requiring acute or subacute medical or surgical intervention
  • Any condition considered incompatible with trial participation by the investigators

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: COHORT
  • Tidsperspektiver: PROSPECTIVE

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrhea

Patients referred to a SeHCAT scan due to suspected bile acid diarrhea, who afterwards turned out to be suffering from SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrhea

Blood samples taken with the objective of identifying a diagnostic test

SeHCAT negative patients

Patients referred to a SeHCAT scan due to suspected bile acid diarrhea, who afterwards turned out to be SeHCAT negative

Blood samples taken with the objective of identifying a diagnostic test

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort
Tidsramme: 1 year from now

AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort

1 year from now

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
AUROC-kurve for BDS hos patienter med hver af de tre undertyper af BAD
Tidsramme: 1 år fra nu
1 år fra nu
AUROC-kurve for BDS i opdagelseskohorten (se 8.2 Dataanalyse)
Tidsramme: 1 år fra nu
1 år fra nu
Korrelation af SeHCAT-testresultat med sværhedsgraden af ​​BAD-symptomer
Tidsramme: 1 år fra nu
1 år fra nu
Korrelation af BDS-testresultater med antal afføringer pr. dag
Tidsramme: 1 år fra nu
1 år fra nu
Biomarkører for BAD: C4 og FGF19
Tidsramme: 1 år fra nu
1 år fra nu

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

31. maj 2024

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

15. april 2025

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

15. april 2025

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

3. maj 2024

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

7. august 2024

Først opslået (Faktiske)

12. august 2024

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

25. september 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

22. september 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. september 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • BAD-DIVA

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .