Development and Application of a Clinical Decision Support System for Exercise Rehabilitation in Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
Studieoversigt
Status
Status
Betingelser
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Intervention / Behandling
Undersøgelsestype
Undersøgelsestype
Tilmelding (Anslået)
Tilmelding
Fase
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Studiekontakt
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Hong Gao
- Telefonnummer: 13773643315
- E-mail: 2439220393@qq.com
Studiesteder
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nantong, Jiangsu, Kina
- Rekruttering
- Affiliated 2 Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu 0513
-
Ledende efterforsker:
- Hongqing Xu, Dr
-
Kontakt:
- Hong Gao
- Telefonnummer: 13773643315
- E-mail: 2439220393@qq.com
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- age between 18 and 55 years
- diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation requiring single-level lumbar fusion surgery - no previous history of lumbar surgery
- Surgical procedures performed by the same surgical team
- willingness to comply with the study protocol and restrictions
- availability of a home WiFi connection
Exclusion Criteria:
- lumbar surgery secondary to neoplasm, tuberculosis, infection, or inflammation
- postoperative infection or revision surgery
- presence of cauda equina syndrome
- diagnosis of schizophrenia, cognitive impairment, or other psychiatric disorders
- coexisting severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases, or congenital conditions precluding exercise participation.
Studieplan
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Ikke-randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Antal våben
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / ArmDeltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / BehandlingIntervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Aktiv komparator: Kontrolgruppen
Kontrolgruppen modtog konventionelle postoperative plejeinterventioner
|
Alle deltagere blev bedt om at opretholde deres sædvanlige daglige aktiviteter og afholde sig fra yderligere behandlinger i hele 6-måneders undersøgelsesperiode.
Before discharge, patients received exercise rehabilitation training guidance from orthopedic specialist nurses and rehabilitation therapists and were given a rehabilitation training manual.
They were instructed to scan the QR code in the manual to watch exercise training videos.
The manual contained information including the goals, methods, frequency, intensity, and precautions of the exercise training.
|
|
Eksperimentel: The intervention group
The experimental group received individualized assessment and exercise rehabilitation intervention through the clinical decision support system for exercise rehabilitation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
|
Alle deltagere blev bedt om at opretholde deres sædvanlige daglige aktiviteter og afholde sig fra yderligere behandlinger i hele 6-måneders undersøgelsesperiode.
The experimental group first developed the functional modules of the OVCF exercise rehabilitation decision support system.
Researchers were trained on participant selection, module use, and task allocation.
Participants received operation demonstrations and a QR code for video guidance, then registered accounts and entered data.
The system auto-captured baseline indicators, generated individualized exercise prescriptions, and pushed them for staff approval.
Before and after each exercise session, patients completed vital signs, pain, and fatigue assessments; the system analyzed these data, generated decision support, and recommended next steps for therapist review.
Data management included visualization, click tracking, and identification of low compliance, triggering individual online support.
A user group facilitated communication.
At follow-ups, osteoporosis clinic staff reviewed personal information and adjusted prescriptions based on exercise experience and outcomes.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
IPAQ-L Scores
Tidsramme: The IPAQ-L scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
|
Physical activity levels were assessed using the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long (IPAQ-L) adapted by Qu Ningning et al.
The questionnaire comprises 27 items across six domains: work, transportation, domestic activities, exercise and recreation, sitting time, and sleep time.
Each domain includes physical activities at high, moderate, and low intensities.
Based on the number of days and accumulated time per day of activity in the past week, weekly physical activity energy expenditure was calculated and expressed in metabolic equivalents (METs).
The test-retest reliability (r=0.927) and criterion validity (r=0.821) of this questionnaire are higher than or equal to those of comparable instruments.
|
The IPAQ-L scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
RPE Score
Tidsramme: The RPE scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
|
Fatigue was assessed using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) , a subjective tool for evaluating exercise intensity developed by Swedish psychologist Gunnar Borg, designed to quantify an individual's perception of physical exertion during exercise.
On the scale, 6 represents no exertion at all; 7-8 indicates extremely light exertion (e.g.sitting quietly); 9-10, very light; 11-12, light exertion; 13-14, moderate exertion; 15-16, heavy exertion; 17-18, very heavy exertion; and 19-20, extremely exhausting, approaching maximal exertion.
|
The RPE scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
|
|
NRS Score
Tidsramme: The NRS scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
|
Postoperative pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), with a total score ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain, 1-3 indicates mild pain, 4-6 indicates moderate pain, 7-9 indicates severe pain, and 10 indicates excruciating pain.
|
The NRS scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
|
|
SUS Score
Tidsramme: The SUS scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
|
Usability was evaluated using the System Usability Scale (SUS) [15-16], which consists of 10 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 representing "strongly disagree" and 5 representing "strongly agree."
For odd-numbered items, the item score is the response score minus 1; for even-numbered items, the item score is 5 minus the response score.
If an item is left blank, it is assigned a score of 3. The sum of the 10 item scores is multiplied by 2.5 to yield the final SUS score, which ranges from 0 to 100.
A score above 60 indicates acceptable usability, ≥70 indicates good usability, ≥80 indicates very good usability, and ≥90 indicates excellent usability.
The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.91.
|
The SUS scores were collected at baseline and at 3 months, and 6 months post-intervention.
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Sponsor
Sponsor
Datoer for undersøgelser
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
Studiestart
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
Primær færdiggørelse
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
Studieafslutning
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
Først indsendt
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
Først opslået (Faktiske)
Først opslået
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
Sidste opdatering sendt
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
Sidst verificeret
Sidst verificeret
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- HGao
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .