Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Personal Exoskeleton or Manual Wheelchair: a Comparison of Performance and Satisfaction in Activities of Daily Living Among People With Spinal Cord Injuries, Using the SCED Methodology. (KER-EXHOME)

14. september 2026 opdateret af: Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonctionnelles de Kerpape

Spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia affect patients' mobility and, consequently, their ability to participate in activities of daily living. In France, according to available sources, the number of people with a symptomatic spinal cord injury is estimated to be between 97,000 and 132,000, with an average age of 55. The incidence is estimated at 1,300 new cases per year.

Following initial treatment, patients' aim is to resume their daily activities. Engaging in these activities is associated with a better quality of life and is recognised as having a positive effect on health. Limitations in their ability to move around directly affect their participation in activities of daily living and, consequently, their quality of life.

To this end, mobility can be supported by a manual wheelchair (MW) or an electric wheelchair (EW); however, these aids do not enable patients to regain the ability to stand, which remains one of the main goals for people with spinal cord injuries.

Robotic exoskeletons can assist with standing and locomotion. To date, robotic exoskeletons have been used in rehabilitation centres. During the rehabilitation phase, these devices have proven to be usable and safe for a wide range of patients with spinal cord injuries. Motorised exoskeletons thus enable patients to perform tasks such as walking, standing upright, rotating, and carrying out dynamic balance exercises.

In the longer term, personal exoskeletons, used at home, could facilitate the performance of productive, domestic, social or recreational activities, such as those carried out on a daily basis by every individual.

Personal powered exoskeletons (PPEs) also appear to generate physiological and psychosocial benefits. Studies describe potential improvements in cardiovascular health, bladder and sphincter function, and a reduced risk of osteoporosis. After a few weeks of training with a motorised exoskeleton, patients report improvements in social functioning, mental health and sub-domains of general health perception on the SF36 Walk Wheel.

It should be noted that the ability to interact socially whilst standing is an important aspect of quality of life for patients with spinal cord injuries. Patients describe the pleasure of eye contact, of being able to walk with assistance, and an improvement in mood. The PPE would complement the wheelchair by enabling ambulation and participation in activities whilst standing.

Preserving upper limb function is a prerequisite for the widespread use of walking exoskeletons in everyday life. A self-supporting PPE, such as the EVE® device, which does not require the use of crutches, aims to enable users to stand up and walk whilst retaining the use of their upper limbs. This active balance control is a crucial function for achieving many functional skills in a domestic environment. One of the technological advantages of the self-balancing exoskeleton lies in the use of dynamics to eliminate the need for crutches, whilst ensuring walking safety.

The next step towards the development of personal exoskeletons for people with spinal cord injuries is to investigate the performance of activities of daily living whilst wearing an exoskeleton. To our knowledge, no such study has been carried out, and our work addresses a gap in the scientific literature by analysing the impact of using a self-propelled PPE on satisfaction and performance when carrying out activities of daily living.

The investigators hypothesise that the personal exoskeleton leads to greater satisfaction when carrying out the four tasks of daily living, compared with that achieved using a manual wheelchair.

In this context, the KER-EXHOME clinical trial, proposed by Dr Stéphanie LEPLAIDEUR (coordinator of this study), and led by the Kerpape Centre (sponsor), aims to compare, in participants with paraplegia, satisfaction and performance when carrying out activities of daily living and physical activities, using the EVE® device compared with a manual wheelchair.

Studieoversigt

Status

Status

Angiver den aktuelle rekrutteringsstatus eller den udvidede adgangsstatus.
Ikke rekrutterer endnu

Betingelser

Betingelser

Den sygdom, lidelse, syndrom, sygdom eller skade, der undersøges. På ClinicalTrials.gov kan tilstande også omfatte andre sundhedsrelaterede problemer, såsom levetid, livskvalitet og sundhedsrisici.

Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.

Detaljeret beskrivelse

The KER-EXHOME study is a single-case experimental design (SCED) with multiple baseline conditions. This methodology enables the analysis of data from a limited number of subjects and is based on three principles: each subject serves as their own control; frequent, repeated measurement of each subject's performance throughout the study phase; and the sequential, randomised introduction of the intervention during the study, which ensures the necessary statistical power.

Undersøgelsestype

Undersøgelsestype

Beskriver karakteren af ​​en klinisk undersøgelse. Undersøgelsestyper omfatter interventionelle undersøgelser (også kaldet kliniske forsøg), observationsundersøgelser (herunder patientregistre) og udvidet adgang.
Interventionel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

Tilmelding

Antallet af deltagere i en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" tilmelding er det mål for antallet af deltagere, som forskerne skal bruge til undersøgelsen.
5

Fase

Fase

Stadiet af et klinisk forsøg, der studerer et lægemiddel eller et biologisk produkt, baseret på definitioner udviklet af U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Fasen tager udgangspunkt i undersøgelsens formål, antallet af deltagere og andre karakteristika. Der er fem faser: Tidlig fase 1 (tidligere opført som fase 0), fase 1, fase 2, fase 3 og fase 4. Ikke relevant bruges til at beskrive forsøg uden FDA-definerede faser, herunder forsøg med enheder eller adfærdsmæssige indgreb.
  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Studiekontakt

Navn og kontaktoplysninger for den person, der kan besvare spørgsmål om tilmelding til en klinisk undersøgelse. Hvert sted, hvor undersøgelsen udføres, kan også have en specifik kontaktperson, som kan være bedre i stand til at besvare disse spørgsmål.

Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup

Studiesteder

  • Frankrig
      • Ploemeur, Frankrig, 56270
        • Centre de Kerpape
        • Kontakt:
        • Kontakt:
        • Ledende efterforsker:
          • Stéphanie Leplaideur, Physician PhD

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Berettigelseskriterier

De nøglekrav, som personer, der ønsker at deltage i et klinisk studie, skal opfylde eller de egenskaber, de skal have. Kvalifikationskriterier består af både inklusionskriterier (som er nødvendige for at en person kan deltage i undersøgelsen) og eksklusionskriterier (som forhindrer en person i at deltage). Typer af berettigelseskriterier omfatter, om en undersøgelse accepterer raske frivillige, har alders- eller aldersgruppekrav eller er begrænset af køn.

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical presentation of paraplegia at a level between T5 and L5 inclusive, AIS A to C inclusive
  • Secondary to a spinal cord injury (traumatic or non-traumatic) occurring more than 6 months ago, clinically and functionally stable
  • Using a manual wheelchair for indoor and outdoor mobility
  • Able to tolerate 45 minutes of standing per day
  • Anthropometric compatibility with the device (weight, height, lower limb measurements, joint ranges of motion);
  • Whether or not they have previous experience of using a PPE;
  • Participants who have signed the written consent form to take part in the study following full and informed consent
  • Participants covered by a social security scheme (beneficiary or eligible dependant) other than the AME.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Osteoporosis with a T-score < -2.5 at the femoral neck, as shown by a bone densitometry scan carried out within the last 12 months.
  • History of osteoporotic fracture(s)
  • Condition or treatment causing secondary osteoporosis (known thyroid disorder, known hypogonadism, known chronic gastrointestinal disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease), corticosteroid therapy, use of bisphosphonates for more than three months, early menopause (before the age of 45), abnormal calcium metabolism test results)
  • Progressive intercurrent conditions: pressure ulcers, infection, venous thrombosis
  • Cardiovascular or pulmonary conditions contraindicating exercise (e.g. heart failure or coronary artery disease within the last 6 months)
  • Untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (SBP > 140 mmHg; DBP > 90 mmHg);
  • Unresolved orthostatic hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg; DBP < 60 mmHg) or deemed contraindicated by the investigator;
  • Unconsolidated or unstable bone lesions of the spine, limbs or pelvis
  • Known syringomyelia, as determined by medical assessment
  • Progressive osteoma, as determined by medical assessment
  • Severe spasticity of the adductor muscles, hamstrings, quadriceps and triceps surae (greater than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale)
  • Decompensated psychiatric or cognitive disorders that may interfere with the proper use of the device
  • Stoma
  • Wearing of an active implantable device An uncorrectable leg-length discrepancy of more than 2 cm when using additional corrective aids
  • Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
  • Skin lesions at points of contact with the PPE (e.g. bruising, skin abrasions, etc.)
  • Need to use a respiratory support device whilst using Eve
  • Inability to operate the device effectively using a manual control interface, due to a functional and/or cognitive impairment, based on the ability to move the joystick in all directions, press and identify the buttons on the manual control interface.
  • Incorrect positioning of the participant in the device (excessive pressure on the support point).
  • Participant deprived of liberty (by court order or administrative decision)
  • Participant of legal age subject to a legal protection order or unable to give informed consent
  • Participation in another ongoing clinical trial
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of childbearing age not using contraception
  • Lack of proficiency in spoken and written French

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Andet
  • Tildeling: N/A
  • Interventionel model: Enkelt gruppeopgave
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm

Deltagergruppe / Arm

En gruppe eller undergruppe af deltagere i et klinisk forsøg, der modtager en specifik intervention/behandling eller ingen intervention i henhold til forsøgets protokol.
Intervention / Behandling

Intervention / Behandling

En proces eller handling, der er i fokus for en klinisk undersøgelse. Interventioner omfatter lægemidler, medicinsk udstyr, procedurer, vacciner og andre produkter, der enten er til undersøgelse eller allerede er tilgængelige. Interventioner kan også omfatte ikke-invasive tilgange, såsom uddannelse eller ændring af kost og motion.
Eksperimentel: Carrying out tasks using the EVE exoskeleton and a manual wheelchair.

Training Phase, Week 1

The training phase for operating the EVE® exoskeleton covers the following functions (designed to ensure that the participant is trained in the use of the EVE® exoskeleton):

  • Standing up;
  • Testing in free mode;
  • Walking;
  • Turning round;
  • Half-squat;
  • Using precision mode;
  • Sitting down;
  • Carrying out emergency extraction training;
  • Archery training, if the participant has no prior experience. Participants will undergo training over 5 sessions, each lasting at least 60 minutes, spread over one week. A minimum of 5 hours' training is required to ensure safety.

Intervention phase, weeks 2 to 4 During this phase, participants will have a 3½-hour session every day (Monday to Friday). During each session, tasks will need to be carried out using the EVE® exoskeleton and the manual wheelchair.
Enhed: Carrying out tasks using the EVE exoskeleton and a manual wheelchair.
Each day (Monday to Friday), participants will have a 3½-hour session. During each session, tasks will need to be carried out using the EVE® exoskeleton and the manual wheelchair. The tasks have been grouped in pairs so that two tasks are carried out in succession. These task groups have been assigned a number, as follows: 1- Archery and retrieving a parcel 2- Making coffee and brushing teeth During a session, the participant will carry out one task group using both devices: the EVE® exoskeleton and the manual wheelchair. These devices have been assigned a letter, as follows: A- EVE® exoskeleton B- Manual wheelchair A random allocation will be used to determine the order of the parameters (B-wheelchair or A-EVE® exoskeleton), the time of day (morning or afternoon), and the task group to be performed in each session for each participant (1 or 2).

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Primære resultatmål

I et klinisk studies protokol er det planlagte resultatmål, der er det vigtigste for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention/behandling. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har ét primært resultatmål, men nogle har mere end ét.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Compare satisfaction and performance when carrying out four activities of daily living using the EVE® exoskeleton, versus those carried out using a manual wheelchair, using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Tidsramme: Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25

The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) will be used to compare perceived satisfaction and performance when carrying out identified activities of daily living using either the EVE® exoskeleton or a manual wheelchair. Using the COPM, satisfaction and performance are assessed on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = very poor performance and satisfaction, 10 = full performance and satisfaction). MCRO scores show a significant improvement between the start and end of treatment; in the SCI validation study, the average improvement reported is approximately 4.25 points (Performance) and 2.96 points (Satisfaction) between two measurement points.

The MCRO will be carried out at the end of each session using one of the devices (wheelchair or exoskeleton). Two assessments must be carried out per half-day.
Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25

Sekundære resultatmål

Sekundære resultatmål

I en klinisk undersøgelses protokol er et planlagt resultatmål, der ikke er lige så vigtigt som det primære resultatmål for at evaluere effekten af ​​en intervention, men som stadig er af interesse. De fleste kliniske undersøgelser har mere end ét sekundært resultatmål.
Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Compare user-assessed performance with clinician-assessed performance, using the Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS)
Tidsramme: Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25

Measurement of task performance as reported by the clinician (occupational therapist and physiotherapist). Clinicians assess overall performance on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being a failure and 10 being optimal performance) after each session.

The PQRS scale will be completed immediately after each task is performed for each of the two devices (wheelchair and PPE). Thus, four scores must be recorded per half-day.
Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25
Time taken to complete each task (in seconds).
Tidsramme: Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25

The time will be recorded upon completion of each task, whether carried out in a wheelchair or using the PPE.

Thus, four times will need to be recorded per half-day.
Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25
To evaluate the user's perception of the ease of use of the EVE® exoskeleton, using the System Usability Scale (SUS)
Tidsramme: Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 12, Day 19, Day 26

The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a standardised questionnaire for measuring the usability of interactive systems, comprising ten items formulated as affirmative statements. For each statement, the user is asked to indicate their agreement or disagreement using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly disagree; 5 = Strongly agree). If the user is unsure how to respond to an item, they are asked to answer it anyway by ticking the centre of the scale (score 3).

Its aim is to measure users' perceptions of a product or service based on their experiences.

The SUS will be assessed at the end of each week. Three SUS ratings will be carried out during the intervention phase.
Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 12, Day 19, Day 26
To assess the psychosocial impact of the EVE® exoskeleton using the French-Canadian version of the F-PIADS scale, which measures the psychosocial impact of an assistive device.
Tidsramme: End of the intervention phase (week 4) : Day 26

This is a 26-item questionnaire that measures the impact on quality of life (psychosocial effects) of using a functional aid from the perspective of the person with a disability, by assessing three concepts: Competence (12 items), Adaptability (6 items) and Self-esteem (8 items).

When completing the questionnaire, the respondent rates each item on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from -3 ('maximum negative impact') to +3 ('maximum positive impact'). A score of 0 indicates 'no impact'. The final score is the average obtained by adding up the scores for all items and dividing the total by 26.

The F-PIADS will be carried out at the end of the intervention phase. Two assessments will be conducted, one for each device (wheelchair and PPE).
End of the intervention phase (week 4) : Day 26
Assess the perceived exertion involved in performing four everyday tasks using the Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale.
Tidsramme: Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25

The RPE scale is a valid method for quantifying physical exertion across a wide variety of exercise types.

It comprises the following categories: a scale from 0 to 10: 0 None, 1 Very easy, 2 Quite easy, 3 Moderate, 4 Quite difficult, 5 Difficult, 7 Very difficult, 10 Very, very difficult. This scale will be used to assess the perception of exertion after completing each task, whether performed in a wheelchair or using the EVE® exoskeleton.
Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25
Assessing the reliability of the EVE® exoskeleton.
Tidsramme: Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25
The performance of the EVE® exoskeleton will be assessed by counting the number of faults that occur during use. A fault is recorded whenever there is an interruption in use that requires the user to return to a seated position, as no other action is then possible.
Intervention phase (Week 2 to 4) : Day 8, Day 9, Day 10, Day 11, Day 12, Day 15, Day 16, Day 17, Day 18, Day 19, Day 22, Day 23, Day 24, Day 25

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Sponsor

Den organisation eller person, der igangsætter undersøgelsen, og som har myndighed og kontrol over undersøgelsen.
Centre Mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation Fonctionnelles de Kerpape

Samarbejdspartnere

Samarbejdspartnere

En anden organisation end sponsoren, der yder støtte til en klinisk undersøgelse. Denne støtte kan omfatte aktiviteter relateret til finansiering, design, implementering, dataanalyse eller rapportering.
Wandercraft
Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille

Efterforskere

Efterforskere

En forsker involveret i et klinisk studie. Beslægtede termer omfatter stedets principal investigator, site sub-investigator, studieformand, undersøgelsesleder og undersøgelseshovedinvestigator.
  • Ledende efterforsker: Stéphanie Leplaideur, Physician PhD, Centre de Kerpape

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Anslået)

Studiestart

Den faktiske dato, hvor den første deltager blev tilmeldt en klinisk undersøgelse. Den "forventede" undersøgelses startdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens startdato.
1. oktober 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

Primær færdiggørelse

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention for at indsamle endelige data for det primære resultatmål. Hvorvidt det kliniske studie sluttede i henhold til protokollen eller blev afsluttet, påvirker ikke denne dato. For kliniske undersøgelser med mere end ét primært resultatmål med forskellige afslutningsdatoer refererer dette udtryk til den dato, hvor dataindsamlingen er afsluttet for alle de primære resultatmål. Den "forventede" primære afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være den primære afslutningsdato for undersøgelsen.
1. april 2027

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

Studieafslutning

Den dato, hvor den sidste deltager i et klinisk studie blev undersøgt eller modtog en intervention/behandling for at indsamle endelige data for de primære resultatmål, sekundære udfaldsmål og uønskede hændelser (det vil sige den sidste deltagers sidste besøg). Den "forventede" undersøgelses afslutningsdato er den dato, som forskerne tror vil være undersøgelsens afslutningsdato.
1. april 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

Først indsendt

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsendte en undersøgelsespost til ClinicalTrials.gov. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den første indsendte dato og postens tilgængelighed på ClinicalTrials.gov (den første offentliggjorte dato).
26. august 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

Den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator første gang indsender en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Sponsoren eller investigatoren skal muligvis revidere og indsende en undersøgelsespost en eller flere gange, før NLM's kvalitetskontrolkriterier er opfyldt. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
14. september 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

Først opslået

Datoen, hvor undersøgelsesposten først var tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov efter National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgang er afsluttet. Der er typisk en forsinkelse på et par dage mellem den dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte undersøgelsesposten, og den første offentliggjorte dato.
18. september 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

Sidste opdatering sendt

Den seneste dato, hvor ændringer i en undersøgelsespost blev gjort tilgængelig på ClinicalTrials.gov. Der kan være en forsinkelse mellem det tidspunkt, hvornår ændringerne blev indsendt til ClinicalTrials.gov af undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator (datoen for sidste opdatering afsendt) og den sidste opdatering, der blev sendt.
18. september 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator indsendte ændringer til en undersøgelsespost, der er i overensstemmelse med National Library of Medicine (NLM) kvalitetskontrol (QC) gennemgangskriterier. Det er sponsorens eller investigatorens ansvar at sikre, at undersøgelsesposten er i overensstemmelse med NLM QC-gennemgangskriterierne.
14. september 2026

Sidst verificeret

Sidst verificeret

Den seneste dato, hvor undersøgelsens sponsor eller investigator bekræftede oplysningerne om en klinisk undersøgelse på ClinicalTrials.gov som nøjagtige og aktuelle. Hvis en undersøgelse med rekrutteringsstatus som rekruttering; rekrutterer endnu ikke; eller aktiv, ikke rekruttering er ikke blevet bekræftet inden for de seneste 2 år, er undersøgelsens rekrutteringsstatus vist som ukendt.
1. september 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Nøgleord

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

Andre identifikatorer eller ID-numre end NCT-nummeret, der er tildelt til en klinisk undersøgelse af undersøgelsens sponsor, finansieringsgivere eller andre. Disse numre kan omfatte unikke identifikatorer fra andre forsøgsregistre og National Institutes of Health-bevillingsnumre.
  • 2025-A02452-47

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Cookieindstillinger

Vi bruger cookies for at sikre, at vi giver dig den bedste oplevelse på vores hjemmeside. For flere detaljer skal du læse omhyggeligt vores Politik om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger og cookies. ...>>>Du kan når som helst ændre dine præferencer eller trække dit samtykke tilbage ved at slette cookies fra din hjemmeside eller computer som beskrevet i politikken. Accepter det og vælg dine præferencer ved at markere de tilsvarende felter i afsnittet "Administrer indstillinger" nedenfor. Læs vores servicevilkår omhyggeligt, inden du fortsætter med at bruge nogen del af dette websted.
«Administrer indstillinger