Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Population-Based Patient-Centric Care: Comprehensive Preventive Cancer Screening Using Health IT (TopCare)

2. Oktober 2014 aktualisiert von: Steven Atlas, Massachusetts General Hospital

Technology for Optimizing Population Care in a Resource-limited Environment

Although there is considerable evidence that current health IT can improve certain elements of care, the most effective and efficient implementation of health IT systems for primary care population management are not currently known. Indeed, while many systems currently take a "case-management" approach to identify and address clinical care issues for high risk patients, no systems to our knowledge apply a risk-based approach that accounts both for adverse clinical outcome risk (e.g. breast cancer in a woman who has not had indicated screening for 4 years) and for clinical process risk (e.g. the likelihood that a specific patient will ignore a reminder letter and would therefore benefit from direct phone or in person contact). The investigators propose to directly test the hypothesis that implementing a health IT platform that 1) provides novel risk-based decision support using data derived from the electronic health record (EHR) and 2) leverages each clinician's unique knowledge of his or her patient panel will result in more effective and more efficient population-based primary care. The investigators will test this hypothesis in a practice-randomized clinical trial of preventive cancer screening within our primary care Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN).

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

In prior NIH-funded research, the investigators have demonstrated the efficacy of an IT-based population management system to improve breast cancer screening (NCI R21 CA121908). The investigators will expand our current IT platform from this single function (breast cancer screening) to a package of cancer prevention actions (breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening) and examine the added benefit of population-level preventive cancer care that is directed by specific clinician knowledge of individual patient needs. Moreover, rather than compare our system to currently sub-optimal "usual care" practice, our goal is to test whether the impact of our intervention exceeds the current state-of-the-art of IT-based population management. Therefore, control group practices will receive augmented standard care defined as a population-level reminder system with automated patient contacts.

In augmented standard care control practices, the investigators will implement a system that includes: 1) a population-based perspective to identify all eligible patients overdue for screening, 2) an automated, centralized process to contact selected patients by letter, 3) a result management system that automatically tracks test scheduling and completion, 4) a web-based, easily accessible tool allowing practice personnel to contact patients not completing testing, and 5) use of patient navigators for high risk patients not responding to initial outreach. In the control arm, the process of escalating the reminder intervention from a letter, to contact by phone call, to a patient navigator, will occur in a standard algorithmic fashion without provider input. While not yet the standard of care nationwide, prior studies have proven the efficacy of such an approach. In intervention practices, the investigators will enhance augmented standard care by implementing a novel system that will enable physicians and clinical population managers to individualize care for each patient in their panel using tools to classify and organize patients by their clinical attributes. The investigators hypothesize that this personalized identification of patients by both their clinical outcome and clinical process risk status will improve the efficacy and efficiency of resource allocation decisions. The key additions to the health IT system for intervention practices will be: 1) a clinical systems IT platform to organize and present clinical data for each clinician's patient panel, 2) an accessible Web-based tool allowing clinicians (physicians and clinical population managers) to view, organize, and investigate their patient panels, and 3) a simple process where the clinician can make a tailored screening decision and designate the method of clinical intervention based upon the patient's risk profile.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

103870

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Vereinigte Staaten, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

21 Jahre bis 75 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Breast cancer: Women 42-74 years old
  • Cervical cancer: Women 21-65 years old
  • Colorectal cancer: Women and men 52-75 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Breast cancer: History of bilateral mastectomy in their EHR
  • Cervical cancer: History of total hysterectomy in their EHR
  • Colorectal cancer: History of total colectomy in their EHR

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: TopCare Intervention

The TOP-CARE intervention will be based on a medical informatics platform that:

  1. Identifies all patients eligible for any of the three cancer screening programs
  2. Links patients with a specific clinician
  3. Offers a visit-independent method for clinicians to review panels of their eligible patients
  4. For patients due for one or more cancer screenings, clinicians will access a web-based informatics tool to:

    1. Screen their panel based upon risk
    2. Defer patients, document exclusions, and update the EHR
    3. Order a screening test with patient information material based upon the patient's risk profile and automatically initiate the process of:

      1. Informing the patient by letter of the need to schedule a test, educating the patient with respect to the benefits of cancer screening, and properly documenting the transaction in the patient's EHR, or
      2. Referral to a patient navigator for patients most likely to benefit from this more intensive approach
We will be evaluating the system in practices where providers are involved in determining to contact a patient, including the most appropriate outreach method, compared with practices where the system is fully automated without provider input.
Aktiver Komparator: Augmented Standard Care
In augmented standard care control practices, we will implement a system that includes: 1) a population-based perspective to identify all eligible patients overdue for screening, 2) an automated, centralized process to contact selected patients by letter, 3) a result management system that automatically tracks test scheduling and completion, 4) a web-based, easily accessible tool allowing practice personnel to contact patients not completing testing, and 5) use of patient navigators for high risk patients not responding to initial outreach. In the control arm, the process of escalating the reminder intervention from a letter, to contact by phone call, to a patient navigator, will occur in a standard algorithmic fashion without provider input.
We will be evaluating the system in practices where providers are involved in determining to contact a patient, including the most appropriate outreach method, compared with practices where the system is fully automated without provider input.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Cancer completion for all eligible cancers
Zeitfenster: 1 year
Average cancer screening test completion rate over the 1-year follow-up period for each eligible patient in all eligible cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal)
1 year

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
% of patients completing all eligible cancer screenings
Zeitfenster: 1 year
Percentage of patients completing all eligible cancer screening modalities at 1-year follow-up will be compared between study arms
1 year
Primary outcome in specified patient subgroups
Zeitfenster: 1 year
  1. Eligible population: prevalent (overdue at baseline) or incident (become overdue during study) cancer screening rates will be compared between study arms.
  2. Patient-physician linkage status: Analyses will be stratified to compare PCP-linked patients between study arms and practice-linked patients between study arms.
  3. Patient risk status: Patients at high risk for not completing screening will be compared between study arms.
1 year
TopCare system measures (intervention practices)
Zeitfenster: 1 year
  1. Percentage of providers (PCPs and clinical population managers) in intervention practices using TOP-CARE system and percentage of eligible patients in clinician panel screened
  2. Percentage of providers (practice personnel and patient navigators) in intervention and control practices using TOP-CARE system and percentage of eligible patients assigned to provider who were contacted
  3. Percentage of eligible patients in clinician (PCP and clinical population manager) panel deferred and reasons selected
1 year

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn

1. Juni 2011

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Juni 2012

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Januar 2013

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

10. Juni 2011

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

13. Juni 2011

Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)

14. Juni 2011

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Schätzen)

3. Oktober 2014

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

2. Oktober 2014

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Oktober 2014

Mehr Informationen

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Gebärmutterhalskrebs

3
Abonnieren