Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Population-Based Patient-Centric Care: Comprehensive Preventive Cancer Screening Using Health IT (TopCare)

2 de octubre de 2014 actualizado por: Steven Atlas, Massachusetts General Hospital

Technology for Optimizing Population Care in a Resource-limited Environment

Although there is considerable evidence that current health IT can improve certain elements of care, the most effective and efficient implementation of health IT systems for primary care population management are not currently known. Indeed, while many systems currently take a "case-management" approach to identify and address clinical care issues for high risk patients, no systems to our knowledge apply a risk-based approach that accounts both for adverse clinical outcome risk (e.g. breast cancer in a woman who has not had indicated screening for 4 years) and for clinical process risk (e.g. the likelihood that a specific patient will ignore a reminder letter and would therefore benefit from direct phone or in person contact). The investigators propose to directly test the hypothesis that implementing a health IT platform that 1) provides novel risk-based decision support using data derived from the electronic health record (EHR) and 2) leverages each clinician's unique knowledge of his or her patient panel will result in more effective and more efficient population-based primary care. The investigators will test this hypothesis in a practice-randomized clinical trial of preventive cancer screening within our primary care Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN).

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

In prior NIH-funded research, the investigators have demonstrated the efficacy of an IT-based population management system to improve breast cancer screening (NCI R21 CA121908). The investigators will expand our current IT platform from this single function (breast cancer screening) to a package of cancer prevention actions (breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening) and examine the added benefit of population-level preventive cancer care that is directed by specific clinician knowledge of individual patient needs. Moreover, rather than compare our system to currently sub-optimal "usual care" practice, our goal is to test whether the impact of our intervention exceeds the current state-of-the-art of IT-based population management. Therefore, control group practices will receive augmented standard care defined as a population-level reminder system with automated patient contacts.

In augmented standard care control practices, the investigators will implement a system that includes: 1) a population-based perspective to identify all eligible patients overdue for screening, 2) an automated, centralized process to contact selected patients by letter, 3) a result management system that automatically tracks test scheduling and completion, 4) a web-based, easily accessible tool allowing practice personnel to contact patients not completing testing, and 5) use of patient navigators for high risk patients not responding to initial outreach. In the control arm, the process of escalating the reminder intervention from a letter, to contact by phone call, to a patient navigator, will occur in a standard algorithmic fashion without provider input. While not yet the standard of care nationwide, prior studies have proven the efficacy of such an approach. In intervention practices, the investigators will enhance augmented standard care by implementing a novel system that will enable physicians and clinical population managers to individualize care for each patient in their panel using tools to classify and organize patients by their clinical attributes. The investigators hypothesize that this personalized identification of patients by both their clinical outcome and clinical process risk status will improve the efficacy and efficiency of resource allocation decisions. The key additions to the health IT system for intervention practices will be: 1) a clinical systems IT platform to organize and present clinical data for each clinician's patient panel, 2) an accessible Web-based tool allowing clinicians (physicians and clinical population managers) to view, organize, and investigate their patient panels, and 3) a simple process where the clinician can make a tailored screening decision and designate the method of clinical intervention based upon the patient's risk profile.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

103870

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

21 años a 75 años (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Breast cancer: Women 42-74 years old
  • Cervical cancer: Women 21-65 years old
  • Colorectal cancer: Women and men 52-75 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Breast cancer: History of bilateral mastectomy in their EHR
  • Cervical cancer: History of total hysterectomy in their EHR
  • Colorectal cancer: History of total colectomy in their EHR

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: TopCare Intervention

The TOP-CARE intervention will be based on a medical informatics platform that:

  1. Identifies all patients eligible for any of the three cancer screening programs
  2. Links patients with a specific clinician
  3. Offers a visit-independent method for clinicians to review panels of their eligible patients
  4. For patients due for one or more cancer screenings, clinicians will access a web-based informatics tool to:

    1. Screen their panel based upon risk
    2. Defer patients, document exclusions, and update the EHR
    3. Order a screening test with patient information material based upon the patient's risk profile and automatically initiate the process of:

      1. Informing the patient by letter of the need to schedule a test, educating the patient with respect to the benefits of cancer screening, and properly documenting the transaction in the patient's EHR, or
      2. Referral to a patient navigator for patients most likely to benefit from this more intensive approach
We will be evaluating the system in practices where providers are involved in determining to contact a patient, including the most appropriate outreach method, compared with practices where the system is fully automated without provider input.
Comparador activo: Augmented Standard Care
In augmented standard care control practices, we will implement a system that includes: 1) a population-based perspective to identify all eligible patients overdue for screening, 2) an automated, centralized process to contact selected patients by letter, 3) a result management system that automatically tracks test scheduling and completion, 4) a web-based, easily accessible tool allowing practice personnel to contact patients not completing testing, and 5) use of patient navigators for high risk patients not responding to initial outreach. In the control arm, the process of escalating the reminder intervention from a letter, to contact by phone call, to a patient navigator, will occur in a standard algorithmic fashion without provider input.
We will be evaluating the system in practices where providers are involved in determining to contact a patient, including the most appropriate outreach method, compared with practices where the system is fully automated without provider input.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cancer completion for all eligible cancers
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
Average cancer screening test completion rate over the 1-year follow-up period for each eligible patient in all eligible cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal)
1 year

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
% of patients completing all eligible cancer screenings
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
Percentage of patients completing all eligible cancer screening modalities at 1-year follow-up will be compared between study arms
1 year
Primary outcome in specified patient subgroups
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
  1. Eligible population: prevalent (overdue at baseline) or incident (become overdue during study) cancer screening rates will be compared between study arms.
  2. Patient-physician linkage status: Analyses will be stratified to compare PCP-linked patients between study arms and practice-linked patients between study arms.
  3. Patient risk status: Patients at high risk for not completing screening will be compared between study arms.
1 year
TopCare system measures (intervention practices)
Periodo de tiempo: 1 year
  1. Percentage of providers (PCPs and clinical population managers) in intervention practices using TOP-CARE system and percentage of eligible patients in clinician panel screened
  2. Percentage of providers (practice personnel and patient navigators) in intervention and control practices using TOP-CARE system and percentage of eligible patients assigned to provider who were contacted
  3. Percentage of eligible patients in clinician (PCP and clinical population manager) panel deferred and reasons selected
1 year

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de junio de 2011

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de junio de 2012

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de enero de 2013

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

10 de junio de 2011

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de junio de 2011

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

14 de junio de 2011

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

3 de octubre de 2014

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de octubre de 2014

Última verificación

1 de octubre de 2014

Más información

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Cáncer de cuello uterino

3
Suscribir