Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

The Association Between STarT Back Tool Subgroups and Postural Stability

1. Februar 2019 aktualisiert von: Allan Riis, Aalborg University Hospital

The Association Between STarT Back Tool Subgroups of Patients With Low Back Pain and Postural Stability Under Conditions of Sensory Deprivation and Cognitive Load

Purpose This trial study the association between SBT subgroups and postural stability. It is theorized that cognitive impairment is more pronounced among patients in SBT group three compared to SBT group one and two. Therefore, it is hypothesized that challenging patients' balance will have a greater impact on the postural sway among patients in SBT group three compared to SBT group one and two in conditions where sensory information is reduced and cognitive load is increased.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Globally low back pain (LBP) and neck pain are the leading causes of disability (1). Consequently, improvements in the assessment and treatment of LBP can have an extensive impact. Patients with LBP constitute a heterogeneous group and to improve treatment there is much focus on identifying subgroups of patients and tailor treatment accordingly. An example of this is the STarT Back Tool (SBT) which has been translated to more than 20 languages and is probably the most used tool for subgrouping of patients with LBP. The SBT sub-groups patients into three groups with a progressing need for treatment. Patients in group one should be given information on LBP and advice to stay active, patients in group two are also recommended supplementary treatment in primary care, and in addition patients in group three need attention to psycho-social issues (2-3). Accordingly to the SBT, patient in group three should be treated with cognitive therapy by a physiotherapist undergoing special training. This training includes mentorship and professional support to enable physiotherapists to elicit and address complex issues in patients with psycho-social barriers to recovery. Subgrouping by SBT and thereby treating patients in group three with cognitive therapy has been found effective in improving their functional outcomes (4-5).

Patients with LBP have found to have different postural control strategies than patients without LBP especially during tasks involving increased task complexity (6-7). However, some studies have not found decreased postural control among patients whit LBP (8-9). Heterogeneous study populations may explain the discrepancy in findings especially if subgroups of patients with LBP have affected postural control while other subgroups are not affected.

Patients with pain often present with some degree of cognitive impairments which could limit the extent to which daily activities could be performed. This may be particularly present among SBT group three patients. Cognitive impairments have been associated with decreased function and consequently reduced balance in elderly, indicating that postural stability requires significant amount of cognitive resource. Since the cognitive resources are limited, if additional tasks compete for these resources, performance in one or more tasks can become affected. The conscious interpretation of (or attention towards) painful stimulations is a costly process that uses significant amount of the cognitive resources available which could impair physical performance. Consequently, this may lead to additional postural sway and thereby restricted balance.

After given written informed consent patients fill in a questionnaire including age, gender, educational level (bachelor, yes/no), employment, sick leave, co-morbidity (other than LBP, yes/no), pain duration (2-6 weeks/sub-acute or chronic), pain intensity (NPR), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (23 question, RMDQ), self-reported health status (EQ-5D visual analogue scale). After filling in the questionnaire patients will be asked to take of their jacket and shoes and to empty their pockets, before measuring height, weight, and testing for static balance.

Postural sway will be measured using a force plate (Metitur Good Balance System®). The force plate will be placed with a distance of 100 cm to a wall in front of the patient and with more than 100 cm of free space to the sides and behind the force plate. The force plate, an equilateral triangle (800 mm), had four strain gauge transducer signals converted by a three-channel DC amplifier and transformed to digital data (50 Hz) and subsequently filtered digitally, using a three-point median filter and IRR filter, with 20 Hz cut-off frequency. On the wall in front of the patient a 12 cm circular green plate will be place in the patients' eye level. Patients will be asked to stand with their feet as closed positioned as possible, without lifting their feet, and to focus on the green plate in front of them. Patients will be asked to replicate this position for each test. The static balance test will require that the subjects stand as quiet as possible during 35 seconds in 4 different conditions in the following order: (i) eyes open and easy counting, (ii) eyes closed and easy counting, (iii) eyes closed and counting in multiples of seven, and (iv) eyes closed and counting backward from 500 in multiples of seven.

The force platform, scale, and person altimeter will be calibrated every fortnight or more frequent. Data will be extracted, checked for any abnormal discrepancies, and saved on a secure driver frequently (at least every fortnight).

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

65

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

      • Aalborg, Dänemark, 9200
        • Sofiendal fysioterapi og kiropraktik

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 65 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Low back pain for more than 14 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs of serious pathology (e.g. signs of fracture, cauda equina syndrome, malignancy, osteoporosis, or spinal inflammatory arthritis)
  • Blindness
  • Dyslexia and not able to reply questionnaires unassisted
  • Pregnancy
  • Not able to walk unassisted

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Diagnose
  • Zuteilung: Nicht randomisiert
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Verdreifachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: STarT Back Tool group 3
Patients scored as high risk patients by the STarT Back Tool
Postural sway will be measured using a force plate (Metitur Good Balance System®).
Experimental: STarT Back Tool groups 1+2
Patients scored as low risk or medium risk patients by the STarT Back Tool
Postural sway will be measured using a force plate (Metitur Good Balance System®).

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Medial-Lateral body sway
Zeitfenster: This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The two balance tests for the primary outcome will be performed with a 1 minute interval.
Additional medial-lateral body sway accessed by analysis of the Center of Pressure (CoP) position. Measured as the difference in medial-lateral CoP range (cm) between a difficult 30 sec. test (eyes closed and difficult counting backwards in multiples of seven) and an easy 30 sec. test (open eyes and easy counting forwards).
This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The two balance tests for the primary outcome will be performed with a 1 minute interval.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Medial-Lateral body sway
Zeitfenster: This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The three balance tests will be performed consecutively within 2 minutes interval.
Additional medial-lateral body sway accessed by analysis of the Center of Pressure (CoP) position. Measured as the difference in medial-lateral CoP range (cm) between a medium 30 sec. test (eyes closed and counting forwards in multiples of seven), a medium-easy 30 sec. test (eyes closed and easy counting backwards), and an easy 30 sec. test (open eyes and easy counting forwards).
This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The three balance tests will be performed consecutively within 2 minutes interval.
Medial-Lateral body sway
Zeitfenster: This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The four balance tests will be consecutively within 3 minutes interval.
Additional medial-lateral body sway will be accessed by analysis of the difference in CoP; velocity (cm/s) between a difficult 30 sec. test (eyes closed and difficult counting backwards in multiples of seven), a medium 30 sec. test (eyes closed and counting forwards in multiples of seven), a medium-easy 30 sec. test (eyes closed and easy counting backwards), and an easy 30 sec. test (open eyes and easy counting forwards).
This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The four balance tests will be consecutively within 3 minutes interval.
Anterior-Posterior body sway
Zeitfenster: This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The four balance tests will be consecutively within 3 minutes interval.
Additional anterior-posterior body sway will be accessed by analysis of the difference in CoP; range (cm) between a difficult 30 sec. test (eyes closed and difficult counting backwards in multiples of seven), a medium 30 sec. test (eyes closed and counting forwards in multiples of seven), a medium-easy 30 sec. test (eyes closed and easy counting backwards), and an easy 30 sec. test (open eyes and easy counting forwards).
This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The four balance tests will be consecutively within 3 minutes interval.
Anterior-Posterior body sway
Zeitfenster: This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The four balance tests will be consecutively within 3 minutes interval.
Additional anterior-posterior body sway will be accessed by analysis of the difference in CoP; velocity (cm/s) between a difficult 30 sec. test (eyes closed and difficult counting backwards in multiples of seven), a medium 30 sec. test (eyes closed and counting forwards in multiples of seven), a medium-easy 30 sec. test (eyes closed and easy counting backwards), and an easy 30 sec. test (open eyes and easy counting forwards).
This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The four balance tests will be consecutively within 3 minutes interval.
Body sway area
Zeitfenster: This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The four balance tests will be consecutively within 3 minutes interval.
Additional sway area accessed by area of an ellipse fitted to the 95% confidence interval of the Center of Pressure position (cm2). Measured as the difference in area (cm2) between a difficult 30 sec. test (eyes closed and difficult counting backwards in multiples of seven), a medium 30 sec. test (eyes closed and counting forwards in multiples of seven), a medium-easy 30 sec. test (eyes closed and easy counting backwards), and an easy 30 sec. test (open eyes and easy counting forwards).
This is a cross sectional study all data will be collected during a 30 minute-session. The four balance tests will be consecutively within 3 minutes interval.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Mitarbeiter

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Allan Riis, PhD, Research unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Denmark

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

4. Februar 2017

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Februar 2019

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

1. Februar 2019

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

17. Februar 2017

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

22. Februar 2017

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

28. Februar 2017

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

4. Februar 2019

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

1. Februar 2019

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Februar 2019

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • AllanRiis_6

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

Nein

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

The data analysed will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Schmerzen im unteren Rücken, postural

Klinische Studien zur Static balance testing

Abonnieren