Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

CareLink Express (CLE Research) (CLE)

20. Mai 2019 aktualisiert von: Baylor Research Institute

The primary objective of this research is to determine if evaluating CIEDs using CareLink Express® can lead to shorter time to interrogation in the Emergency Department compared to evaluation of devices using traditional evaluation procedures. The goal of the research is to determine if patients evaluated by CareLink Express® have a reduction of "time to interrogation" compared to the traditional patient cohort.

Secondary objectives of the study are to determine any significant differences in the two populations regarding:

  1. Health care resource utilization including total charges for ED care.
  2. Number of patients leaving the ED without being seen (LWBS) or left without the device interrogation completed.
  3. Device related issues detected.

Studienübersicht

Status

Abgeschlossen

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Background:

Over the past 15 years the number of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) implanted has increased dramatically. This is due in part to the aging of the population in general, but primarily due to expanded indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization pacemaker therapy (CRT-P) devices, and CRT devices with defibrillator capabilities ("biventricular ICDs" or CRT-D devices). As more patients with structural heart disease survive longer, and as more CIEDs are placed, the number of patients requiring treatment in the emergency departments for arrhythmias and potential device-related matters has increased.

When a patient with a CIED experiences a problem they presume to be cardiac in nature, they often go to the emergency room to seek care. Most emergency departments (ED) are neither equipped to interrogate the CIED, nor staffed with personnel trained to interrogate the CIED. These CIEDs often record data that can assist the physician in the formulation of a diagnostic and treatment strategy tailored to the specific needs of the patient. However, interrogation of the device is dependent on proprietary programming equipment that is not routinely kept in the emergency department. The programming equipment has traditionally been a "stand-alone" unit, which can store the data from the device interrogation (onto a USB drive or floppy disk), but does not have the capability to transmit the data to the patient's physician for rapid interpretation. In addition, ED personnel are not routinely trained to assess CIEDs. In most health care institutions, it is standard practice for a representative of the manufacturer to be contacted so the device can be evaluated. The representative must then travel to the ED with the programming equipment to interrogate the CIED on site. After interrogation, either the representative discusses the findings with the ED physician, or calls the physician that manages the patient's device. The process of in-person device evaluation can be cumbersome and inefficient, especially in an emergency setting. The time involved in the device interrogation process can cause delays in patient care and add unnecessary costs for the patient and health care institution.

Methods:

Patients with CIEDs will be evaluated in the ED setting. Patients will be divided into two cohorts. Each cohort will have a minimum of 50 patients.

The control group will include CIED patients who have been evaluated in the ED at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano and Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano. A minimum of 50 devices not compatible with the CareLink Express® system will be prospectively interrogated in the traditional evaluation method using the device manufacturer representative.

The study group will include CIED patients who present to the ED and receive a device evaluation using the CareLink Express® system. A minimum of 50 devices will be prospectively evaluated using CareLink Express®.

The patient's presenting symptoms in the ED include any medical conditions (not just cardiac).

Consent will be obtained from the subject after treatment has occurred in the ED and prior to release. Consent can be obtained from the subject or the subject's Legally Authorized Representative. This will ensure that treatment is not delayed or altered for research purposes.

Initial data will be collected using a Data Collection Form. The research staff or a research trained Emergency Department staff member will complete the Data Form.

Data will be collected by the research coordinators who will collect the Data Collection Forms from the ED at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano and Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano. The Data Collection Form will be used by the research coordinators to determine the patient's study cohort.

Other data will be collected by the research coordinators using the hospital EMR and Financial systems.

Data Collection:

Criteria for the hospital and ED encounters will be extracted from the hospital EMR, the Data Collection Form, or the hospital financial system. Device data will be extracted from the device report completed at the time of the device interrogation.

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

60

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

Patients who arrive to the Emergency Department with a problem they presume to be cardiac in nature.

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

1) Patients who present to the ED with a problem they believe to be cardiac in nature.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who present to the ED after transmitting a remote device evaluation within the last 24 hours.
  2. Patients referred to the ED from a physician's office or other health care facility where the CIED has already been interrogated or evaluated.
  3. Patients in cardiac arrest or other life threatening situations.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Kohorten und Interventionen

Gruppe / Kohorte
Control Group
The control group will include CIED patients who have been evaluated in the ED at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano and Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano. A minimum of 50 devices not compatible with the CareLink Express® system will be prospectively interrogated in the traditional evaluation method using the device manufacturer representative.
CareLink Express
The study group will include CIED patients who present to the ED and receive a device evaluation using the CareLink Express® system. A minimum of 50 devices will be prospectively evaluated using CareLink Express®.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Patients evaluated by CareLink Express have a reduction of "time of interrogation" compared to the traditional patient cohort.
Zeitfenster: 1 year
The primary objective of this research is to determine if evaluating CIEDs using CareLink Express® can lead to shorter time to interrogation in the Emergency Department compared to evaluation of devices using traditional evaluation procedures.
1 year

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Significant differences between the two populations from data analysis
Zeitfenster: 2 years
Health care resource utilization including total charges for ED care, number of patients leaving the ED without being seen (LWBS) or left without the device interrogation completed, or device related issues detected.
2 years

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Mitarbeiter

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. März 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

27. August 2018

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

27. August 2018

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

25. Februar 2016

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

18. Juli 2017

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. Juli 2017

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Mai 2019

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

20. Mai 2019

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2017

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 015-234

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Vorhofflimmern

3
Abonnieren