Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

CareLink Express (CLE Research) (CLE)

20 de maio de 2019 atualizado por: Baylor Research Institute

The primary objective of this research is to determine if evaluating CIEDs using CareLink Express® can lead to shorter time to interrogation in the Emergency Department compared to evaluation of devices using traditional evaluation procedures. The goal of the research is to determine if patients evaluated by CareLink Express® have a reduction of "time to interrogation" compared to the traditional patient cohort.

Secondary objectives of the study are to determine any significant differences in the two populations regarding:

  1. Health care resource utilization including total charges for ED care.
  2. Number of patients leaving the ED without being seen (LWBS) or left without the device interrogation completed.
  3. Device related issues detected.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Condições

Descrição detalhada

Background:

Over the past 15 years the number of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) implanted has increased dramatically. This is due in part to the aging of the population in general, but primarily due to expanded indications for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization pacemaker therapy (CRT-P) devices, and CRT devices with defibrillator capabilities ("biventricular ICDs" or CRT-D devices). As more patients with structural heart disease survive longer, and as more CIEDs are placed, the number of patients requiring treatment in the emergency departments for arrhythmias and potential device-related matters has increased.

When a patient with a CIED experiences a problem they presume to be cardiac in nature, they often go to the emergency room to seek care. Most emergency departments (ED) are neither equipped to interrogate the CIED, nor staffed with personnel trained to interrogate the CIED. These CIEDs often record data that can assist the physician in the formulation of a diagnostic and treatment strategy tailored to the specific needs of the patient. However, interrogation of the device is dependent on proprietary programming equipment that is not routinely kept in the emergency department. The programming equipment has traditionally been a "stand-alone" unit, which can store the data from the device interrogation (onto a USB drive or floppy disk), but does not have the capability to transmit the data to the patient's physician for rapid interpretation. In addition, ED personnel are not routinely trained to assess CIEDs. In most health care institutions, it is standard practice for a representative of the manufacturer to be contacted so the device can be evaluated. The representative must then travel to the ED with the programming equipment to interrogate the CIED on site. After interrogation, either the representative discusses the findings with the ED physician, or calls the physician that manages the patient's device. The process of in-person device evaluation can be cumbersome and inefficient, especially in an emergency setting. The time involved in the device interrogation process can cause delays in patient care and add unnecessary costs for the patient and health care institution.

Methods:

Patients with CIEDs will be evaluated in the ED setting. Patients will be divided into two cohorts. Each cohort will have a minimum of 50 patients.

The control group will include CIED patients who have been evaluated in the ED at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano and Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano. A minimum of 50 devices not compatible with the CareLink Express® system will be prospectively interrogated in the traditional evaluation method using the device manufacturer representative.

The study group will include CIED patients who present to the ED and receive a device evaluation using the CareLink Express® system. A minimum of 50 devices will be prospectively evaluated using CareLink Express®.

The patient's presenting symptoms in the ED include any medical conditions (not just cardiac).

Consent will be obtained from the subject after treatment has occurred in the ED and prior to release. Consent can be obtained from the subject or the subject's Legally Authorized Representative. This will ensure that treatment is not delayed or altered for research purposes.

Initial data will be collected using a Data Collection Form. The research staff or a research trained Emergency Department staff member will complete the Data Form.

Data will be collected by the research coordinators who will collect the Data Collection Forms from the ED at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano and Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano. The Data Collection Form will be used by the research coordinators to determine the patient's study cohort.

Other data will be collected by the research coordinators using the hospital EMR and Financial systems.

Data Collection:

Criteria for the hospital and ED encounters will be extracted from the hospital EMR, the Data Collection Form, or the hospital financial system. Device data will be extracted from the device report completed at the time of the device interrogation.

Tipo de estudo

Observacional

Inscrição (Real)

60

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Método de amostragem

Amostra Não Probabilística

População do estudo

Patients who arrive to the Emergency Department with a problem they presume to be cardiac in nature.

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

1) Patients who present to the ED with a problem they believe to be cardiac in nature.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who present to the ED after transmitting a remote device evaluation within the last 24 hours.
  2. Patients referred to the ED from a physician's office or other health care facility where the CIED has already been interrogated or evaluated.
  3. Patients in cardiac arrest or other life threatening situations.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

Coortes e Intervenções

Grupo / Coorte
Control Group
The control group will include CIED patients who have been evaluated in the ED at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano and Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano. A minimum of 50 devices not compatible with the CareLink Express® system will be prospectively interrogated in the traditional evaluation method using the device manufacturer representative.
CareLink Express
The study group will include CIED patients who present to the ED and receive a device evaluation using the CareLink Express® system. A minimum of 50 devices will be prospectively evaluated using CareLink Express®.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Patients evaluated by CareLink Express have a reduction of "time of interrogation" compared to the traditional patient cohort.
Prazo: 1 year
The primary objective of this research is to determine if evaluating CIEDs using CareLink Express® can lead to shorter time to interrogation in the Emergency Department compared to evaluation of devices using traditional evaluation procedures.
1 year

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Significant differences between the two populations from data analysis
Prazo: 2 years
Health care resource utilization including total charges for ED care, number of patients leaving the ED without being seen (LWBS) or left without the device interrogation completed, or device related issues detected.
2 years

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Colaboradores

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de março de 2016

Conclusão Primária (Real)

27 de agosto de 2018

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

27 de agosto de 2018

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

25 de fevereiro de 2016

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

18 de julho de 2017

Primeira postagem (Real)

21 de julho de 2017

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

22 de maio de 2019

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

20 de maio de 2019

Última verificação

1 de julho de 2017

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 015-234

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em Fibrilação atrial

3
Se inscrever