Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Las migrañas aceptan acupuntura láser comparada en análisis de sangre de MMP2 y CGRP: un ECA simple ciego.

29 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: Taichung Veterans General Hospital

La comparación del dolor de cabeza primario en el análisis de sangre de MMP2 y CGRP: un estudio controlado, aleatorizado, simple ciego y controlado con acupuntura láser simulada.

Aims:

To investigate the efficacy of laser-acupuncture for the severity of primary headache and comorbidities, and the Lab data examination.

Methods:

In this hospital-based prospective single blind randomized sham-controlled study, patients over 18 years old with primary headache will be randomly divided into two treatment arms including laser-acupuncture and sham-controlled group. The expected laser-acupuncture protocol will be bilateral BL2, GB20, EX-HN5, GB8, LI4, LR3 and midline EX-HN3 in totally eight sessions at the first month. In the sham-laser-acupuncture group, patients will receive eight sessions of laser-acupuncture for free after unblinding. We expected to track patients for at least half year. The diagnosis and classification of headache was evaluated using the ICHD-3 criteria. The severity of headache was evaluated using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and headache diary provided by Taiwan Headache Society. The co-primary efficacy end points are change in migraine days per month and variation of MIDAS. The secondary end point is the reducing of the severity of comorbidities including headache related anxiety and depression, and both of the quality of life and sleep.

In addition, patients' characteristics will be investigated as follows:

  1. Sociodemographic factors (ethnicity, age, sex, body weight, BMI, blood pressure)
  2. Headache related parameters (onset, duration, pain scale, current medication for headache, menstrual cycle)
  3. Anxiety, evaluate by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
  4. Depression, evaluate by Beck's Depression Inventory
  5. Quality of life, evaluate by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
  6. Quality of sleep, evaluate by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
  7. Aura of headache
  8. Episodic or chronic headache (If patient diagnosed as migraine.)
  9. Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia (If patient diagnosed as migraine.) During the following time, we will need the patient's blood samples four times, each times 20cc, all need 80cc for Lab test of MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin.

Importance:

In our hospital, we perform laser-acupuncture for patients with headache for several years. A prospective randomized controlled study is the key tools to establish the efficacy of laser-acupuncture for primary headache, and the Lab data with MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin for approval. Look forward to help improve therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Reclutamiento

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Headache is one of the most common complaints encountered in medical institution as known as an almost universal human experience. Approximately 65% of headaches are classified as primary, which was a composite of migraine, tension-type headache, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia and other primary headaches according to the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3). Primary headaches encompass a heterogeneous group of neurologic disorders and might be bothersome for patients.

It's well established that acupuncture can be considered a treatment option for migraine prevention. The efficacy of laser-acupuncture is similar to acupuncture, and laser-acupuncture is a non-invasive therapeutic approach and safety. It could reduce the risk of hemorrhage, infection and needle phobia. However, the efficacy of laser-acupuncture in primary headache remains inconclusive.

MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin are new Lab examination for following up the patients suffered from migraine.

Aims:

To investigate the efficacy of laser-acupuncture for the severity of primary headache and comorbidities, and the Lab data examination.

Methods:

In this hospital-based prospective single blind randomized sham-controlled study, patients over 18 years old with primary headache will be randomly divided into two treatment arms including laser-acupuncture and sham-controlled group. The expected laser-acupuncture protocol will be bilateral BL2, GB20, EX-HN5, GB8, LI4, LR3 and midline EX-HN3 in totally eight sessions at the first month. In the sham-laser-acupuncture group, patients will receive eight sessions of laser-acupuncture for free after unblinding. We expected to track patients for at least half year. The diagnosis and classification of headache was evaluated using the ICHD-3 criteria. The severity of headache was evaluated using Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) and headache diary provided by Taiwan Headache Society. The co-primary efficacy end points are change in migraine days per month and variation of MIDAS. The secondary end point is the reducing of the severity of comorbidities including headache related anxiety and depression, and both of the quality of life and sleep.

In addition, patients' characteristics will be investigated as follows:

  1. Sociodemographic factors (ethnicity, age, sex, body weight, BMI, blood pressure)
  2. Headache related parameters (onset, duration, pain scale, current medication for headache, menstrual cycle)
  3. Anxiety, evaluate by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
  4. Depression, evaluate by Beck's Depression Inventory
  5. Quality of life, evaluate by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
  6. Quality of sleep, evaluate by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
  7. Aura of headache
  8. Episodic or chronic headache (If patient diagnosed as migraine.)
  9. Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia (If patient diagnosed as migraine.) During the following time, we will need the patient's blood samples four times, each times 20cc, all need 80cc for Lab test of MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin.

Importance:

In our hospital, we perform laser-acupuncture for patients with headache for several years. A prospective randomized controlled study is the key tools to establish the efficacy of laser-acupuncture for primary headache, and the Lab data with MMP2, CGRP, substance P, beta-endorphin for approval. Look forward to help improve therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

60

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Taichang
      • Taichung, Taichang, Taiwán, 404
        • Reclutamiento
        • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
        • Contacto:
          • Yuan-Chen Liu
          • Número de teléfono: 82641 886-4-2359-2525

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Migraine patient under the diagnosis and classification of headache was evaluated using the ICHD-3 criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years old
  • Pregnancy

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación cruzada
  • Enmascaramiento: Triple

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Laser treatment

CM patients with unsatisfactory pharmacological effects receive laser acupuncture for 8 sessions that spanned 4 weeks. Laser stimulation energy of 4.5 J for 30 seconds at each of the following acupoints: bilateral Cuanzhu (BL2), Fengchi (GB20), Taiyang (EX-HN5), Shuaigu (GB8), Hegu (LI4), Taichong (LR3) and midline Yintang (EX-HN3)

Laser stimulation energy of 4.5 J for 30 seconds at each of the following acupoints: bilateral Cuanzhu (BL2), Fengchi (GB20), Taiyang (EX-HN5), Shuaigu (GB8), Hegu (LI4), Taichong (LR3) and midline Yintang (EX-HN3)

Comparador falso: Sham treatment

CM patients with unsatisfactory pharmacological effects receive sham treatment for 8 sessions that spanned 4 weeks. Sham treatment had no laser output.

Sham treatment with no laser output, stimulate the same acupoints as laser acupuncture group as follows: 30 seconds at bilateral Cuanzhu (BL2), Fengchi (GB20), Taiyang (EX-HN5), Shuaigu (GB8), Hegu (LI4), Taichong (LR3) and midline Yintang (EX-HN3)

After 6 months followed up, the sham group received truely Laser stimulation energy of 4.5 J for 30 seconds at each of the following acupoints: bilateral Cuanzhu (BL2), Fengchi (GB20), Taiyang (EX-HN5), Shuaigu (GB8), Hegu (LI4), Taichong (LR3) and midline Yintang (EX-HN3), and followed up for another 3 months.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
cGRP
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in cGRP from baasline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
MMP2
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in MMP2 from baasline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Difference in the number of headache days per month
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in monthly migraine days (MMD) from baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the of headache attacks lasting hours per month
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in acute headache medications usage days per month from baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the headache pain intensity (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

changes in the headache severity (based on NRS) between baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the number of days with acute headache medication intake per month
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in acute headache medications usage days per month from baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the Migraine Disability Assessment
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

changes in the Migraine Disability Assessmen between baseline and each follow-up time point.

Title: Migraine Disability Assessmen Maximum value:450 Minimum value:0 Higher scores mean: worsen outcome

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the Beck's Depression Inventory
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in Beck's Depression Inventory between baseline and each follow-up time point

Title:Beck's Depression Inventory Maximum value:63 Minimum value:0 Higher scores mean: worsen outcome

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Difference in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale between baseline and each follow-up time point

Title:Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Maximum value:21/21 Minimum value:0/0 Higher scores mean:worsen outcome

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
30% reduction in migraine days
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

≥ 30% reduction in migraine days between baseline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
Substance P
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in Substance P from baasline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
beta-endorphin
Periodo de tiempo: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

change in beta-endorphin from baasline and each follow-up time point

12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Chi-Hsiang Chou, M.D., Taichung Veterans General Hospital
  • Director de estudio: Chi Sheng Wang, M.D., Taichung Veterans General Hospital
  • Director de estudio: Huan Yun Wu, M.D., Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

7 de abril de 2025

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de noviembre de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

2 de septiembre de 2024

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de septiembre de 2024

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

4 de septiembre de 2024

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

30 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • CF24162B

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .